sacked for email misuse story

[billb]

anyone else think this is a bit excessive??

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/4745555.stm

[Carrera2]

I'd have sacked them for being feet-dragging, workshy typical council workers.

[slinky]

Someone was sacked for the same reason at a company I used to work at, only it was a video, with some batteries... and ... ewww..
slinky

[vetteheadracer]

Scary.....the thought of CC topless

[bigandclever]

I guess it's a bit excessive considering the pictures were probably already in TheDailyStar / Heat / CelebritySnatch. But if them's the rules.... fair enough, you can't be punished for what people send you, but then forwarding it on is a bit of a no-no.

Says the bloke who received the "Man with an enormous cock" email from his girlfriend while in a customer presentation. And who also inadvertently ran beard.exe

[dick dastardly]

If you're going to get sacked for looking at naked chicks, atleast make sure they're decent naked chicks!

[tycho]

You have to be stupid to forward stuff like this over a company connection, no sympathy for them I'm afraid.

[JagLover]

dick dastardly said:

If you're going to get sacked for looking at naked chicks, atleast make sure they're decent naked chicks!

Hey Charlotte Church is more than all right.

(she used to look allot better though)

[4WD]

Indeed. They were a bit messy to save.

[jimothy]

dick dastardly said:

If you're going to get sacked for looking at naked chicks, atleast make sure they're decent naked chicks!

Oh I don;t know, she's not too bad. My missus fancies her...

[rsvmilly]

JagLover said:

dick dastardly said: If you're going to get sacked for looking at naked chicks, atleast make sure they're decent naked chicks! Hey Charlotte Church is more than all right. (she used to look allot better though)

What's your name? Gary Glitter?

[dick dastardly]

You've obviously never seen the state on her at 2 am hanging around the Cardiff clubs. It's enough to turn even Peter Stringfellow

[MILF]

So is nobody going to put me out of my misery & post said pics on here ?

Mmmm....Charlotte Church.

[JagLover]

rsvmilly said:

JagLover said: Hey Charlotte Church is more than all right. (she used to look allot better though) What's your name? Gary Glitter?

When she was legal of course

[simpo two]

'The pictures are believed to show the teenager topless.'

Well gosh.

'The inquiry comes three weeks after eight Manchester council workers were suspended for allegedly viewing and sending images of a homophobic nature.'

At this rate there won't be anybody left there. I don't suppose the council tax payers will notice much difference though.

[rsvmilly]

TBH all of this crap is just because the council are scared of being sued by some lazy fat chick whose ambulance-chasing lawyer insists she can't work due to being exposed to a picture of boobs. FFS, she's got some hasn't she?

[r988]

rsvmilly said:

TBH all of this crap is just because the council are scared of being sued by some lazy fat chick whose ambulance-chasing lawyer insists she can't work due to being exposed to a picture of boobs. FFS, she's got some hasn't she?

lets not find out...

[MILF]

r988, I agree. A pair of saggly spaniels ears is not what I want to envisage whilst I contemplate what to make myself for tea tonight (this notwithstanding that just 3 desks away their exists the personification of such an individual....shudder).

Still would like Ms Church though (shudders for an entirely different reason altogether).

[anonymous-user]

The company I work for has removed someones external email facility because he sent on average 7 personal emails a day!!

[Don]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Really? Depends if they're long missives that demonstrate three hours of work time were wasted or short messages...after all...most firms let you make personal telephone calls - within reason.