50 Years Of ITV
Author
Discussion

golf1986

Original Poster:

364 posts

254 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
i'm sick of this 50 years of ITV thing already

please tell me how long it is on for

srebbe64

13,021 posts

267 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Surely you're not suggesting that the media are a bunch of self-congratulatory, introspective, luvvies are you?

staceyb

7,107 posts

254 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
I'll guess roughly a year maybe, the whole they are 50 possibly?

or maybe im reading into this wrong?

>> Edited by staceyb on Thursday 22 September 18:32

golf1986

Original Poster:

364 posts

254 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
no what i am sayin is that this looking back on the 50 is a little bit boring for a 19 year old fair enough i go out to the pub with ma pals alot of nights
but it is quite grating on me

staceyb

7,107 posts

254 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
so dont put itv on you know its going to be shit so skip the channel problem solved

golf1986

Original Poster:

364 posts

254 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
staceyb said:
I'll guess roughly a year maybe, the whole they are 50 possibly?

or maybe im reading into this wrong?

>> Edited by staceyb on Thursday 22 September 18:32


i hope to god you are reading it wrongly

there will be hole through my tv if it is on for a year


BliarOut

72,863 posts

269 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Every night, top fifty somebolloxorother.... Must have cost them almost fifty quid for the whole seasons scheduling.

Utter dross

munky

5,328 posts

278 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Most things are improved on over time. Cars, planes, communication, architecture, IT - generally gets cheaper, faster, smaller (ok, bigger in the case of architecture). So, is TV (content) the only thing we've ever invented that steadily regresses over time? Does anyone else think that more channels is not necessarily a good thing? Same number of people watching more channels = less revenue per channel = worse programming.

beano500

20,854 posts

305 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Apparently, fifty years ago the advent of ITV was compared by Lord Reith to....










....small pox!





Sometimes I think he had a point!

shirepro

11,838 posts

265 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Good piece in the Times sports section today on the FIFPRO footballer awards, suggesting that the real award and test for footballers is sometyhing like winning the Premiership, FA Cup, or winning the champions league and all this constant award is just duplicity, made worse by the need to have that Icon of the coach potatoe Eammmon Holmes presenting the award for 'world legend'and Rooney being towered over by Jerry Hall.

I agree. Can't recall the last 'best bricklayer' awards on TV. I guess as they have free air space and our advertising money they can put on whatever back slapping tripe they like, although I understand Charlote Church was something to behold!

cy88

2,808 posts

260 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
Shouldn't this be posted in the TV Forum?

bmgm3

10,480 posts

273 months

Thursday 22nd September 2005
quotequote all
50 years of ITV to the day .....and what a load of crap on tonight to celebrate.Ok, 49 up is kinda good,but thats all.