Deadly Game with Asteroids
Deadly Game with Asteroids
Author
Discussion

beano500

Original Poster:

20,854 posts

305 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
Heard about this on Today just now...

[i]Don Quixote to charge right into asteroid[/i]

http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/space/SpaceRepublish_1156884.htm

Basically we're going to play billiards with an asteroid, just to practice.


Now this asteroid was never going to hurt us.

But don't you remember when you started playing billiards/snooker/pool. Just occasionally, you'd manage to balls it up completely and pocket the wrong one, yes? Well what if they go and knock one asteroid into something else and that hits something else and eventually something come back to hit us!??? :eek:

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

274 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
Would you not rather know if we can deflect one before we have to? I certainly would, looks like a good mission, with quite a lot of finding out about their make-up as well as the fireworks.

yertis

19,714 posts

296 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
I used to love asteroids

4WD

2,289 posts

261 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
So you have a rock or lead asteroid, possibly a mile across moving at thousands of miles per hour. And a little alloy satellite is going to crash into it? So what! It's going to do bugger all. It would be like a flea landing on an elephant. Unless it's packing a nuclear warhead it will be a total waste of time.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

274 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
4WD said:
So you have a rock or lead asteroid, possibly a mile across moving at thousands of miles per hour. And a little alloy satellite is going to crash into it? So what! It's going to do bugger all. It would be like a flea landing on an elephant. Unless it's packing a nuclear warhead it will be a total waste of time.

Part of the point of the mission though is to find out more about what they're made of and how they're stuck together - i.e. to go some way to finding out how likely your lead asteroid is. (Would be worth a f|_|ck of a lot of money if you could move it somewhere useful)

Eric Mc

125,694 posts

295 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
I would imagine that the main point of this mission to to find out a bit more about how asteroids are actually made - rather than to shift it. That "angle" has veen seized on by the press whose scientific knowledge of asteroids was probably gleaned from watching "Armageddon" repeatedly.

juk

580 posts

281 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
yertis said:
I used to love asteroids


Me too - hours of fun, still great today.

Aren't those little saucers b*st*rds tho'?

vetteheadracer

8,273 posts

283 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
Hope there isn't a cannon and we end up potting the blue with the brown.

judas

6,237 posts

289 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
Nah - we'll be fine. Mention asteroids and people immediately visualise stuff from various sci-fi films: the Millennium Falcon dodging between spinning rocks and the like. Reality is somewhat different - there are huuuuuge amounts of space between asteroids, so unless you pull of the jammiest fluke shot ever you're not going to pot the black on the break.

Don

28,378 posts

314 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
4WD said:
So you have a rock or lead asteroid, possibly a mile across moving at thousands of miles per hour. And a little alloy satellite is going to crash into it? So what! It's going to do bugger all. It would be like a flea landing on an elephant. Unless it's packing a nuclear warhead it will be a total waste of time.


Nope. Its the nuke thats a total waste of time. You can let off a great big bang and it isn't going to do a thing...if its too close.

Thump the thing with feather early enough and you might only deflect its course by 0.1x10-66m but that could be enough to create a diversion in its course of tens of thousands of miles some years later.

The key to protecting the earth (if we're ever to do it) is to map every last object capable of doing us harm, preducting their orbits accurately for thousands of years into the future, and deciding early enough to do something about it. You might do something very, very insignificant at the time - but later it would count.

timmy30

9,325 posts

257 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
From what Iv'e seen at the Cinema they always end up hitting/heading for America anyway.

yertis

19,714 posts

296 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
Don said:
The key to protecting the earth (if we're ever to do it) is to map every last object capable of doing us harm, preducting their orbits accurately for thousands of years into the future, and deciding early enough to do something about it. You might do something very, very insignificant at the time - but later it would count.


I wonder if that has ever been done before, in ancient history, and we are only now reaping the benefits...

r988

7,496 posts

259 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
timmy30 said:
From what Iv'e seen at the Cinema they always end up hitting/heading for America anyway.


but always end up with a chunk landing on Paris anyway....

yertis

19,714 posts

296 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
r988 said:

timmy30 said:
From what Iv'e seen at the Cinema they always end up hitting/heading for America anyway.



but always end up with a chunk landing on Paris anyway....


More proof that God is an Englishman...

XM5ER

5,094 posts

278 months

Tuesday 27th September 2005
quotequote all
some scientists said:
Astronomers are aware that the theory of the devastating effect an asteroid impact possibly had on the world's dinosaurs 65 million years ago is producing phenominal grants from gullible civil servants and that they had better do something extravagant with them.