Cost of public sector pensions 'nears £1 trillion'
Cost of public sector pensions 'nears £1 trillion'
Author
Discussion

Jaglover

Original Poster:

46,801 posts

265 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
A report by the Institute of economic affairs reveals that the government has understated the amount of the public sector pension liabilities.

The Government estimates the public sector pension liability to be £460bn, compared with just under £300bn in 1998. However, the IEA report, written by Neil Record, says the actual figure is £817bn - a sum far higher than the UK's national debt and about 70 per cent of the annual national income. Pension liabilities in the public sector will soar to more than £1 trillion by 2008.

The Governments only action on this issue has been to make the situation worse (through hiring 800,000 extra public sector employees most of whom have generous pension schemes), delay for 8 years and then implement a half hearted reform that raises the retirement age for new public sector employees only from 60 to 65.


Telegraph article

Cost of public sector pensions 'nears £1 trillion'
By Robert Watts (Filed: 13/11/2005)

Pension liabilities in the public sector will soar to more than £1 trillion by 2008, more than three times what they were when Labour came to power, according to a shocking new report from the Institute of Economic Affairs, the independent think tank.

The report, written by a former Bank of England economist, said government figures grossly underestimate how much taxpayers' money will be needed to pay the retirement benefits of teachers, civil servants, the police and other public sector workers.

The Government estimates the public sector pension liability to be £460bn, compared with just under £300bn in 1998. However, the IEA report, written by Neil Record, says the actual figure is £817bn - a sum far higher than the UK's national debt and about 70 per cent of the annual national income.

Record's report says the Government's pension projections fail to take proper account of rising life expectancy and public sector wage inflation. The paper also gives new insight into just how expensive public sectors pensions have become.

The report says policewomen receive retirement benefits that cost 85 per cent of their basic salary to maintain. The equivalent figure for male police officers is 75 per cent and for male and female members of the armed forces 66 and 73 per cent. The Government is engaged in tense negotiations with public sector unions over how to make the schemes more affordable.

Record said: "It is vital the true cost of public sector pensions is made transparent. Only then is it possible to have a serious discussion about alternatives. Unions need to know how valuable their pension schemes are. Perhaps their members would prefer much higher levels of basic pay for a different form of pension arrangement."

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
Hmmm.... and they wonder why Council tax goes up!

slapmatt

1,132 posts

252 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
Haha, is that bloke a comedian. I wonder if he kept a straight face when he used the words "public sector" and "transparent" in the same sentence!

timmy30

9,325 posts

257 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
What can you say really. I recently read a paper dated from 1997 that referred to the UK being the only Western Economy that was well placed to avoid massive fiscal imbalance by 2020 as our public pension deficit was only 5% of GDP.......

.....now it's 70% of GDP, nice one Gordon very prudent.

Jaglover

Original Poster:

46,801 posts

265 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
What makes it even worse is that this has been combined with an assualt on private pensions.

timmy30

9,325 posts

257 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
Jaglover said:
What makes it even worse is that this has been combined with an assualt on private pensions.


Btw JL I qualified today, been putting myself through CIMA exams and managed to cobble together enough months of experience to meet the criteria from the past 11 years of work. You're an accountant aren't you?

Jaglover

Original Poster:

46,801 posts

265 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
timmy30 said:
Jaglover said:
What makes it even worse is that this has been combined with an assualt on private pensions.


Btw JL I qualified today, been putting myself through CIMA exams and managed to cobble together enough months of experience to meet the criteria from the past 11 years of work. You're an accountant aren't you?


Yep ACA

Well done on qualifying

timmy30

9,325 posts

257 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
Jaglover said:
timmy30 said:
Jaglover said:
What makes it even worse is that this has been combined with an assualt on private pensions.


Btw JL I qualified today, been putting myself through CIMA exams and managed to cobble together enough months of experience to meet the criteria from the past 11 years of work. You're an accountant aren't you?


Yep ACA

Well done on qualifying


Cheers mate Good excuse to raid the cellar for a nice bottle of bubbly tonight.

james_j

3,996 posts

285 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
...and just think how much worse it's going to get when the additional 500,000 plus people working in the public sector added since New(?) Labour came to power begin to draw their pensions. You ain't seen nuthin' yet!

HarryW

16,037 posts

299 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
Who's gonna be the last one to leave and turn off the lights then .

H

timmy30

9,325 posts

257 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
james_j said:
...and just think how much worse it's going to get when the additional 500,000 plus people working in the public sector added since New(?) Labour came to power begin to draw their pensions. You ain't seen nuthin' yet!


500,000? Where on earth did you get that from?!! It's over 1,000,000 and still rising.

scorp

8,783 posts

259 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
According to chancellor Brown, public spending has been "fully costed and is affordable". Someone is telling lies or is bad at arithmetic if we are worrying we can't afford them. I wonder who ?

>> Edited by scorp on Monday 14th November 14:07

timmy30

9,325 posts

257 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
scorp said:
According to chancellor Brown, public spending has been "fully costed and is affordable". >> Edited by scorp on Monday 14th November 14:07


he is a card, and people reckon he's got no sense of humour!

Jaglover

Original Poster:

46,801 posts

265 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
Interesting to reflect how the government's accounts would change if they had to account for their pension funds under FRS17

scorp

8,783 posts

259 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
Jaglover said:
Interesting to reflect how the government's accounts would change if they had to account for their pension funds under FRS17


You mean to say the government is rearranging (hiding) costs, im shocked!