Am I too honest?
Author
Discussion

blindswelledrat

Original Poster:

25,257 posts

262 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
After a recent burglary I had a visit form the insurance investigator concerning my contents policy.
Despite being badly out of pocket overall I could not bring myself to 'add a few things' to the list of losses.
The investigator didnt even insist on any receipts to sign off the claim.
Bearing in mind a different insurer wont pay up for my motorbike stolen in the incident who here would have padded out the claim a little?

gbbird

5,197 posts

274 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
I reckon a bit of 'poetic licence' on such claims is pretty fair, considering the amount we have to pay for insurance in the first place, regardless of whether we actually use it or not!

speedychrissie

2,994 posts

269 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
i wouldnt even be able to pad my claim out a bit cos i dont have any contents insurance. i got my quote for it a few weeks ago and it would have been more to cover the contents than the building alone (even tho i only have a few crappy pcs and, 1 crappy tele and a mediocre hifi). apparently bristol is almost as bad as london for contents!
chris

blindswelledrat

Original Poster:

25,257 posts

262 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
gbbird said:
I reckon a bit of 'poetic licence' on such claims is pretty fair, considering the amount we have to pay for insurance in the first place, regardless of whether we actually use it or not!


On the whole I agree but I have developed a really perverse kind of loyalty towards Direct Line largely because they pay claims without a quibble (as opposed to some of the other s out there) and they have done extremely badly out of me over the past year.

alexkp

16,484 posts

274 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
I'm afraid I too suffer from an excess of honesty Blindswellrat - it's been a curse all my life.

It has become very obvious though that society and the state in general no longer rewards honesty at all, and in fact discourages it.

So maybe I need to have a rethink. Perhaps I really am the mug after all.

silversun

4,373 posts

256 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
No, more people should be honest.

I know a couple who have inflated a home insurance claim 3 separate times by thousands of pounds and it just increases premiums for everyone else. Totally wrong, IMO.

Lurking Lawyer

4,535 posts

255 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
gbbird said:
I reckon a bit of 'poetic licence' on such claims is pretty fair, considering the amount we have to pay for insurance in the first place, regardless of whether we actually use it or not!


Why do you think premiums are so high to begin with? At least in part because people adopt the same attitude as you and inflate their claims, leading the insurance companies to have to pay out more!

The argument is circular.

>> Edited by Lurking Lawyer on Wednesday 23 November 13:44

themaskedavenger

676 posts

278 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
Honesty is the best policy if only every one would do it we would all be a few quid better off.

MJK 24

5,679 posts

266 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
I'm quite honest with this sort of thing.

My car was stolen in the summer. The insurance co. wanted to know what was in the car etc. I let them know about all my cd's, shades, CD player and car cover in the boot. The car was recovered soon after, miraculously I thought with all of this stuff still present so I let them know and they removed them from the claim.

ZR1cliff

17,999 posts

279 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


Ime the same,on the whole honest although i can "wheel and Deal".

I put my reputation before being dishonest as it takes a long time to build trust and only one little thing to bring it down.

Jaglover

46,803 posts

265 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
No you are not being 'too' honest.

If more people were like you this country would be a better place.

alfaman

6,416 posts

264 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
silversun said:
No, more people should be honest.

I know a couple who have inflated a home insurance claim 3 separate times by thousands of pounds and it just increases premiums for everyone else. Totally wrong, IMO.


Fortunately false claims will be harder to achieve in the future .... some Insurance co's are installing "lie detection" software at their call centres - basically detecting "stressed" and other characteristics in the callers voice - which are strong indicators of telling porkies.

blindswelledrat

Original Poster:

25,257 posts

262 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


I have exactly the same frustrations. There doesn't actually seem to be a downside to being crooked nowadays and I don't believe in God so why can I not just shake off thes morals I'm saddled with???

grass widow

2,201 posts

253 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
No I can't pad out insurance claims either, have only claimed twice on the house insurance, and I was well impressed with how well they handled the claims.

But people are always saying 'go on they won't know'. But I would and I would feel guilty. I have a real problem with telling bare faced lies.

speedchick

5,288 posts

252 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
alfaman said:

Fortunately false claims will be harder to achieve in the future .... some Insurance co's are installing "lie detection" software at their call centres - basically detecting "stressed" and other characteristics in the callers voice - which are strong indicators of telling porkies.


I don't like the idea of that, I mean if you have just come home to find your front door smashed in and all your valued/valuable possesions stolen, then surely you are going to sound stressed/upset/angry on the phone?

wolves_wanderer

12,956 posts

267 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
speedchick said:
alfaman said:

Fortunately false claims will be harder to achieve in the future .... some Insurance co's are installing "lie detection" software at their call centres - basically detecting "stressed" and other characteristics in the callers voice - which are strong indicators of telling porkies.


I don't like the idea of that, I mean if you have just come home to find your front door smashed in and all your valued/valuable possesions stolen, then surely you are going to sound stressed/upset/angry on the phone?
Not to mention having navigated 15 levels of a phone menu, holding for 30 minutes and trying to explain your claim to an Indian call centre.

Mr Whippy

32,453 posts

271 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
Problem with lies is, they can so easily catch you up, or you get caught out, and for what really, a few hundred quid, even a few thousand, not worth it if you get caught out and done for insurance fraud...

At least if you are honest it's good karma, and you'll never get caught out.


I know a few people who had "water leaks" all over their hifi and carpet, so they got new tv and hifi and new carpet.... oh thats such bad luck That was 10 years ago and even then I just thought WTF, you could easily afford what you've just claimed for...

Honesty is the best policy. And with insurers it's YOU who pays anyway, so your only ripping yourself and others off, not the insurer!

Dave

deadslow

8,795 posts

253 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
Honesty always the best policy and has to be cheaper in the long run. If only we could persuade unscrupulous body repair centres of this wisdom - they are the real crooks

Thelemming

4,319 posts

295 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2005
quotequote all
There is perhaps an addendum to the "honesty is best" policy, in that sometimes what is right isnt neccesarily what's 100% honest.

Case in point, an aquaintance of mine was told that several items were, for whatever reason, not covered on his policy after a burglary.

His CD and DvD collection multiplied slightly to cover the approximate value of what was gone.

End result - He paid for his insurance and got back what was lost. Or that he was a thieving git and should have accepted that they welched on their agreement to cover his possesions over smallprint.