Should Iran be bombed?
Author
Discussion

Petrol_noggin

Original Poster:

3,046 posts

251 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Yes or No its simple, and keep it clear.

I vote yes, and I couldn't give a flying chimp if you hate me for it.

vipers

33,521 posts

259 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Well personally I think we screwed up on Iraq, so we should tread carefully here. What if they decide WE should be bombed, what then?

Petrol_noggin

Original Poster:

3,046 posts

251 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
NO, YES, SIMPLE!!! raaaaar grrrrrr


carry on.....

jimbeaux

33,791 posts

262 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
No.

srebbe64

13,021 posts

268 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Only as a very, very, very last resort - and then only based on proper inteligence!

Lois

14,706 posts

283 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Only if it puts us at risk in any way and is proven.
If america want to then so be it but we really shouldn't get involved for their sakes.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

270 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
srebbe64 said:
Only as a very, very, very last resort - and then only based on proper inteligence!
Didn't Tony say that's what he had last time? Would the public support a war on the word of a proven liar? Whatever the government say I have lost all faith in their ability to tell the truth.

Boosted Ls1

21,200 posts

291 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
I think we should let Israel decide and support them if they do. They have the most to lose but there's plenty of time yet.

Boosted.

nbetts

1,455 posts

260 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
NO.

However, if Iranian forces invaded the UK. Then , YES.

Call my view Insular....

dilbert

7,741 posts

262 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
I'd not worry about it if I were you. They've got a month to figure it out, then another two or three years, before they can crank up the reactor.

It gives a bit more time, for the middle east to calm down a bit. I doubt that the government or the international community will forget.

Some say, that Bin Laden has already bought briefcase based nuclear weapons from the Russians. If he has got them, I'll bet he's waiting for someone with enough of a grudge but no real intent, perhaps Iran, to be capable of manufacturing them.

They can do mass spectroscopy, isotope analysis, to work out which and where it came from. It's not clear to me if this will be good enough to determine the perpetrator of a Nuclear attack, on the UK for example.

If he does have them, then that's my bet on what he's waiting for.

I don't know if bombing Iran is right myself, but I still think it's probable.

Petrol_noggin

Original Poster:

3,046 posts

251 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
so 33% positive NO, 11% yes, 55% unsure/conditional

dilbert

7,741 posts

262 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Petrol_noggin said:
so 33% positive NO, 11% yes, 55% unsure/conditional


Well I'm a yes, but not right now, and possibly not if the situation changes. If you dig it out I'd put money on that being the true UN position too.

Petrol_noggin

Original Poster:

3,046 posts

251 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
dilbert said:
Petrol_noggin said:
so 33% positive NO, 11% yes, 55% unsure/conditional


Well I'm a yes, but not right now, and possibly not if the situation changes. If you dig it out I'd put money on that being the true UN position too.


As good a case as any for president Ahmadinejad to choose his words carefully in the next few weeks. One single statement could shift half of that 55% to the yes side.

vipers

33,521 posts

259 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
Petrol_noggin said:
NO, YES, SIMPLE!!! raaaaar grrrrrr


carry on.....


Oky dokey, thats a NO then from me.

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

265 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
Iran should be worried about the UN, after all they may write them a "strongly worded letter"!

dilbert

7,741 posts

262 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
How about this scenario.....

Iran build a briefcase bomb. During the Muslim revolt against the west, unnamed middle eastern terroists get hold of it, and it goes off accidently, but in the middle east.

Who do you think they're going to blame?

I don't know what's causing this frenzy, but if it gets out of control it's going to be bad for everyone. Someone, somewhere needs to take some "rational pills".

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

263 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
Personally I think we should simply do what Iraq did years ago and bomb only thier nuclear facilities.
My guesswork suggests that 2 hours of bombing will set them back by 30 years or so on the Nuclear front with minimum innocent casualties and everyones a winner!

bilko2

1,693 posts

263 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
Why the flip would i think we need to bomb Iran?
Yes i listen to news
There is so much hate round this place recently that it has effected me too i fear.
Can't we just get on with our lives?
I wonder if this an international preocupation at the moment?, ANGER that is.

That would be a NO btw

R988

7,501 posts

260 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
Yes

ZR1cliff

17,999 posts

280 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
NO...give diplomacy a chance.