ID cards, another take
Author
Discussion

BliarOut

Original Poster:

72,863 posts

270 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
So, the government want ID cards. They're going to be really secure and stop terrorism and everything. They are really great, honest. They are so good they'll really conclusively prove who you are and stuff. You just apply for one and then they add the biometric information of the applicant and then that proves who you are.

But hang on just a goddam minute. What do you actually need to apply for one? A birth certificate, a passport, some domestic bills? All forms of ID that exist can be faked. So what's to stop someone obtaining existing fake documentation and then applying for an ID card, to which HMG will helpfully attach their own biometric data and prove conclusively that they are the person whose ID they have stolen?

I know the government will say "oh, but that's impossible" but as we all know, they are wrong. It's completely possible. Are we heading towards super ID theft? Imagine trying to resolve that if it happened to you.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

275 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
Are we heading towards super ID theft?

In a word, yes. The National Identity Register will be a marvelous 'one stop shop' for identity thieves.
BliarOut said:
Imagine trying to resolve that if it happened to you.

You'll just have to change your fingerprints, retina patterns and DNA, oh, hang on, you can't, bugger......

wolves_wanderer

12,959 posts

268 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
If you're annoyed now then don't read this story Rob.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politic

Of course, the fact that it isn't law has never stopped Blair taking parliament for granted has it?

dogwatch

6,385 posts

253 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
Fraud prevention? I don't think so......

www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/21/lineage_id_theft/

Mr Whippy

32,453 posts

272 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
"make it easier to trace terror suspects"

So, they suspect people of being a terrorist, and the cards will simply allow them to trace them more easily.

Considering how they already suspect the wrong people, does this fill anyone with confidence, especially if your traced and shot while utilising public transport

The whole reasoning for the cards stinks of lazy policing and blanket bombing everyone with the potential of being a suspect, even when they have done nothing wrong!

Guilty until proven innocent will be a real condition of our policing in the UK if ID cards go ahead!

Dave

MilnerR

8,273 posts

289 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
"make it easier to trace terror suspects"

So, they suspect people of being a terrorist, and the cards will simply allow them to trace them more easily.

Considering how they already suspect the wrong people, does this fill anyone with confidence, especially if your traced and shot while utilising public transport

The whole reasoning for the cards stinks of lazy policing and blanket bombing everyone with the potential of being a suspect, even when they have done nothing wrong!

Guilty until proven innocent will be a real condition of our policing in the UK if ID cards go ahead!

Dave


It's all very simple, when you go to get your card you have to state whether you are a terrorist, illegal immigrant or asylum seaker. This information is then displayed on the card thus making us all safer....

On a serious note, the ONLY way a system like this will be useful (in terms of the state protecting itself from its citizens) is if you have to carry them everywhere you go AND you have to display them everytime you make a transaction. Anything less than this will render them pointless. The government know this and so once the cards are in place will slowly increase the legislation surrounding them until you need an ID card to buy a loaf of bread!
ID theft is of little concern to the government, it will have no impact on the scheme as a whole and the misery caused to a few hundred thousand people who become victims of ID theft will not endanger the government position.

jimothy

5,151 posts

268 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
When the future MrsJimothy applied for a National Insurance number they needed proof of where she lived. She could take her driving licence or a utility bill but according to the beurotwts the best think she could take would be a signed letter from me stating that she lives with me.

With security checks like this, its no wonder ID cards will be next to useless

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

275 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
jimothy said:
When the future MrsJimothy applied for a National Insurance number they needed proof of where she lived. She could take her driving licence or a utility bill but according to the beurotwts the best think she could take would be a signed letter from me stating that she lives with me.

With security checks like this, its no wonder ID cards will be next to useless

Useless is the best we can hope for.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

286 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
BliarOut said:
Are we heading towards super ID theft?

In a word, yes. The National Identity Register will be a marvelous 'one stop shop' for identity thieves


And blackmailers....

It'll be easy to copy the data from your card...the kit will be along in a minute.

Right then, Mr Prescott, what's it worth to keep quiet about your visit to the Embarrassing Ailments Clinic....?

Wildfire

9,951 posts

283 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
So now the government spend 32m on the cards and will say "Well, I though the argument has been won, so we spent the money, can't let it go to waste!" Another reaon to press ahead!!

TeamD

5,060 posts

263 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
I don't think that anyone has mentioned this bit...

What happens if you live in more than one place? Do we think that the database designers will allow for this? Because then banks certainly don't! I have a shared bank account with my ex and we use it for the payment of maintenance for my daughter, the problem is that i can no longer access it because they won't send me a card for it, because they can't cope with the fact that the two parties who share the account live in different places. in actual fact, my ex no longer lives at the address on the account but I'm not allowed to change it because of data protection. Obviously I need to be protected against myself don't it?

BliarOut

Original Poster:

72,863 posts

270 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
wolves_wanderer said:
If you're annoyed now then don't read this story Rob.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politic

Of course, the fact that it isn't law has never stopped Blair taking parliament for granted has it? [/quote
[quote=The Article]
Last week, Tony Blair told the BBC he thought the government had "won the argument".
Like you have Tony. You thought the poll tax was bad, wait till you try and enforce this you .

nervous

24,050 posts

261 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
luckily for you Rob, not even terrorists will want to steal your indentity. the idea is to look remotely plausible.

BliarOut

Original Poster:

72,863 posts

270 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
nervous said:
luckily for you Rob, not even terrorists will want to steal your indentity. the idea is to look remotely plausible.
Harumph. Do you think they'll let me use the photo from flares on an ID card?

nervous

24,050 posts

261 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
nervous said:
luckily for you Rob, not even terrorists will want to steal your indentity. the idea is to look remotely plausible.
Harumph. Do you think they'll let me use the photo from flares on an ID card?


i see no reason why not: i cant imagine anything bad could come from having a photo i.d. where youre dressed like gary glitter. might wanna cancel that holiday to bangcok tho.





BliarOut

Original Poster:

72,863 posts

270 months

Tuesday 28th February 2006
quotequote all
That was DS, not me

Don't Google D/s whatever you do