MP's expenses
Author
Discussion

Jonny_

Original Poster:

4,696 posts

236 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
Amazed there isn't already a thread on this (unless I'm being dozy and missed it...)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7329749.stm

So these greedy tosspots can claim:

Groceries/food/provisions
TV licence AND Sky
Rent
Interest on mortgage
Utility bills
Council tax
Phone bills
Cleaning
Household repairs
Home insurance
Plus "additional cost" of running a second home!

FFS... why do we pay these bent c***s a wage? What on earth do they have left to spend it on?! If I had all the above paid for me I'd be living like a king on my measly £23k salary!

Now I can claim expenses for work... fuel for getting to site and back, hotel cost for working away, tools and materials, printer ink, paper etc... I always thought that was pretty decent, but compared to what the MP's get it's positively stingy!

Olf

11,978 posts

247 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
If you have to deal with the vagaries of IR-35 and running your own limited co in a legal way where you have to justify every last penny spent then yes... it is a bit sick making.

Edited by Olf on Friday 4th April 20:24

Globulator

13,847 posts

260 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
There is definitly one rule for them, and another much harder one for us.
It is ironic that labour are so good at separating themselves from the common man, Ed Balls, man of the people is on £600,000 IIRC.
They must have a fine tuned hypocrisy gland, similar to Red Ken's 'I don't feel guilty so it's not wrong' philosophy.

fkers.

Jonny_

Original Poster:

4,696 posts

236 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
Ed Balls is a complete and utter c**t; the epitome of Nu Labour greedy lying pseudo-socialist snakiness.

Please don't mention his name again - the mere mention makes me extremely angry as apparently he's related to me curse

shadowninja

79,993 posts

311 months

Friday 4th April 2008
quotequote all
It pissed me off. It's no wonder we're out of money despite increased council tax and other taxes. I have problems believing anything any of these fkers say when ever they open their filthy mouths.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

274 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Jonny_ said:
If I had all the above paid for me I'd be living like a king on my measly £23k salary!
What, even if, as well as your house in S Yorks, you also had to fund a house in London so that you could do your job?

They do some things though, and without any checks, that surely no-one else would be allowed to do.

esselte

14,626 posts

296 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
What, even if, as well as your house in S Yorks, you also had to fund a house in London so that you could do your job?

.
So long as I could trouser the increase in the value of my London home after 5 years tax free....

Edited by esselte on Saturday 5th April 00:11

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Globulator said:
It is ironic that labour are so good at separating themselves from the common man, Ed Balls, man of the people is on £600,000 IIRC.
How do you get £600k? As a cabinet minister he is barred from taking any outside directorships and consultancies. He will get his salary of £115k or therabouts plus his expenses and allowances. Unikely to add up to more than $200k? Which is pretty ordinary when compared to most plc directors or many local government ceo's.

I hate the but lets not exaggerate.

LaSarthe+Back

2,084 posts

242 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Jonny_ said:
Amazed there isn't already a thread on this (unless I'm being dozy and missed it...)
Yep smile

http://pistonheads.com/xforums/topic.asp?h=0&f...

ccensoreds


Brown and Boris

11,838 posts

264 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Top Troghers over 20K;

George Osborne - £21,533
Margaret Beckett - £21,415
David Cameron - £21,359
Mark Oaten - £21,178
William Hague - £20,071

Deva Link

26,934 posts

274 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
esselte said:
Deva Link said:
What, even if, as well as your house in S Yorks, you also had to fund a house in London so that you could do your job?

.
So long as I could trouser the increase in the value of my London home after 5 years tax free....
Even MP's can't do that - it's not their primary residence.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

274 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]

esselte

14,626 posts

296 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
esselte said:
Deva Link said:
What, even if, as well as your house in S Yorks, you also had to fund a house in London so that you could do your job?

.
So long as I could trouser the increase in the value of my London home after 5 years tax free....
Even MP's can't do that - it's not their primary residence.
If they're thete for 4-5 days a week it will be their primary residence.Another way is to have your constituency house in your partner's name and you London house in your name......?

Edited by esselte on Saturday 5th April 11:19

Globulator

13,847 posts

260 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Jonny_ said:
I can claim expenses for work... fuel for getting to site and back, hotel cost for working away, tools and materials, printer ink, paper etc... I always thought that was pretty decent, but compared to what the MP's get it's positively stingy!
Actually you can only claim reduced taxation when spending your own money on these items.
Getting them paid for you is completely different.

Globulator

13,847 posts

260 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
Globulator said:
It is ironic that labour are so good at separating themselves from the common man, Ed Balls, man of the people is on £600,000 IIRC.
How do you get £600k? As a cabinet minister he is barred from taking any outside directorships and consultancies. He will get his salary of £115k or therabouts plus his expenses and allowances. Unikely to add up to more than $200k? Which is pretty ordinary when compared to most plc directors or many local government ceo's.

I hate the but lets not exaggerate.
From this article - although it does include his squeeze so I guess he is only up for £300,000.

Those expenses are of course... Tax free.

Which I guess is an equivalent wage of 300000 / 0.6 = £500,000

So I know why he smiles a lot, it's not just the sly grin of someone whos never even been a teacher being put in charge of children.. Still, we can rejoice that we'll be paying his gold plated pension when we're old and grey - lucky our retirement age is going up eh?

Deva Link

26,934 posts

274 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Globulator said:
Those expenses are of course... Tax free.
Oh come on - this is getting ridiculous.

Everyone's expenses are tax free - because they replacing payments you made out of your taxed income.

Olf

11,978 posts

247 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
Globulator said:
Those expenses are of course... Tax free.
Oh come on - this is getting ridiculous.

Everyone's expenses are tax free - because they replacing payments you made out of your taxed income.
Not the same is it? These expenses are not out of an MP's taxed income - there out of our taxed income.

esselte

14,626 posts

296 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
Globulator said:
Those expenses are of course... Tax free.
Oh come on - this is getting ridiculous.

Everyone's expenses are tax free - because they replacing payments you made out of your taxed income.
Are you happy that (y)our money is being used to enable the MPs to make a killing in the property market?Why are they allowed to claim for food for God's sake?If they were at their non-London home they'd have to buy it for themselves.It's not as if they're having to live in a hotel in London is it?They have a house bought for them with all the mod cons (cooker for example) thrown in.....

Deva Link

26,934 posts

274 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
Olf said:
Deva Link said:
Globulator said:
Those expenses are of course... Tax free.
Oh come on - this is getting ridiculous.

Everyone's expenses are tax free - because they replacing payments you made out of your taxed income.
Not the same is it? These expenses are not out of an MP's taxed income - there out of our taxed income.
What on earth are you talking about???

Deva Link

26,934 posts

274 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
esselte said:
Deva Link said:
Globulator said:
Those expenses are of course... Tax free.
Oh come on - this is getting ridiculous.

Everyone's expenses are tax free - because they replacing payments you made out of your taxed income.
Are you happy that (y)our money is being used to enable the MPs to make a killing in the property market?Why are they allowed to claim for food for God's sake?If they were at their non-London home they'd have to buy it for themselves.It's not as if they're having to live in a hotel in London is it?They have a house bought for them with all the mod cons (cooker for example) thrown in.....
"happy" would probably be an exaggeration, but it's an inevitable consequence of the job they do, the fact that it's in London etc etc.

My company effectively has bought me a Mercedes, with the monthly allowance and the mileage payments I get. Is that any different?