Can't they keep their noses out of anything?
Can't they keep their noses out of anything?
Author
Discussion

Strangely Brown

Original Poster:

16,227 posts

262 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all

SS HSV

9,646 posts

289 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
They're always medaling with something wink

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

264 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Targets for Olympic medals? How are they going to rig the statistics arrange that one, then? Muppets.

Simond001

4,519 posts

308 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
on that basis we need to win every medal at the 2012 olympics!

rude-boy

22,227 posts

264 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Because none of the lads and lasses where that bothered about how they are going to do before this were they?

FFS.

scotal

8,751 posts

310 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Haven't we left it a bit late to be setting targets like this....surely it whould have been some sort of ongoing program of sporting development (which could have used a tiny fraction of the cash that we are wasting on 2012, and still made a decent difference.

Skipppy

1,136 posts

241 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Is Brown trying to re-coup all that gold?!

fulham911club

2,046 posts

273 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
What's wrong with having a target? All commercial operations work on this basis. Most other sporting nations operate a similar type of expectation. Many if not most of the athletes are state-sponsored so why not give the overall team a target?

gopher

5,160 posts

290 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
rude-boy said:
Because none of the lads and lasses where that bothered about how they are going to do before this were they?

FFS.
yes If I were an Olympic athlete and saw this I could not help but find it really de-motivational.

Edited by gopher on Tuesday 5th August 14:50

Bushmaster

27,593 posts

310 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Am I wrong to enjoy this picture (linked from the link above)?


BrassMan

1,501 posts

220 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
No.

What do they propose, should the team miss this target? claim a press release in a different base?

missliv

191 posts

226 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Does "the government" seriously think that competitors will set out to deliberately lose? banghead

Poledriver

29,620 posts

225 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Good idea! We don't get any choice about our hard-earned being used for the sake of sport, which is of no benefit to the majority of people in this country. If we are forced to contribute we should see some return, even if it is only a few trashy medals.
Personally I think that if someone wants to indulge in sport they should find ways to finance it themselves, either from working or charitable contributions, so those who wish to donate can do so. It would be much better if this money is used for health or education!
I dread to think how much of the money we pay in tax (including the speeding taxes) is going to be wasted in 2012!

Edited by Poledriver on Tuesday 5th August 14:52

Deva Link

26,934 posts

276 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:
Am I wrong to enjoy this picture (linked from the link above)?

Beth has already had to pull out of a couple of events.

Incorrigible

13,668 posts

292 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Poledriver said:
Stuff
I completely agree, sport should be for the rich only. The working classes shouldn't have any aspirations of sporting success

Silent1

19,762 posts

266 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
Bushmaster said:
Am I wrong to enjoy this picture (linked from the link above)?

Beth has already had to pull out of a couple of events.
Like shaving ryans privates?

Geronimo

626 posts

223 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
SS HSV said:
They're always medaling with something wink
very good

Bushmaster

27,593 posts

310 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
missliv said:
Does "the government" seriously think that competitors will set out to deliberately lose? banghead
Not deliberately, but there is no harm in saying 'You have indulged your hobby at the taxpayer's expense for the last x years. Now this is what we expect in return...'


Swilly

9,699 posts

305 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
I fail to appreciate the purpose of setting these targets for purposes of value for money.

If the UK wins zero medals doesnt that suggest, amongst other things that:

Not enough money is being put into UK sport !!
Other nations' sports people are better !!

Fittster

20,120 posts

244 months

Tuesday 5th August 2008
quotequote all
Incorrigible said:
Poledriver said:
Stuff
I completely agree, sport should be for the rich only. The working classes shouldn't have any aspirations of sporting success
Should the poor be taxed to pay for peoples sporting aspirations??