BRUNSTROM caught with his pants down again
Discussion
Remember the story about Brunny's intrepid probe into security at police HQ when he climbed scaffolding and broke in through an unlocked window...?
Wasn't quite what it seemed, it seems...Brunny was telling porkies...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1040987/Wh...
Before I go, look at the pic.
Does anyone know why Brunny's wearing a hat that says ARAF? That's Welsh for SLOW...
Wasn't quite what it seemed, it seems...Brunny was telling porkies...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1040987/Wh...
Before I go, look at the pic.
Does anyone know why Brunny's wearing a hat that says ARAF? That's Welsh for SLOW...
vacuous daily mail reader said:
Brunstrom is probably a freemason and, as such, is above the law. The police authorities of the UK are rich in masonry and therefore the incident will be swept under the thick piled carpet of unaccountability, just as the vehicular homicides perpetrated by the traffic police are.
This may well be the case, but times are certainly changing. A lot of the new Police Stations I've seen lately are made of glass. What exactly is the story here !?
His key fob doesnt work, being a bit of a can-do-dick-head he decided to climb in, but is then confronted by his own police thinking he is breaking in.
A worst it is a bit embarrassing, but nothing more.
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Brainstorm is a dick, but this story just looks like malice which is not what the press should be about.
His key fob doesnt work, being a bit of a can-do-dick-head he decided to climb in, but is then confronted by his own police thinking he is breaking in.
A worst it is a bit embarrassing, but nothing more.
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Brainstorm is a dick, but this story just looks like malice which is not what the press should be about.
Swilly said:
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Its known as "lying". If he's making a habit of doing it over something so minor as this and supressing the evidence by destroying it, then dosent that A) Call into question his fitness as an officer?
B) Cast doubt on his truthfulness in a court of law?
C) Prove that indeed he really is a Richard Head?
I would suggest A, B and C. Get this plank out.
Deltaf01 said:
Swilly said:
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Its known as "lying". If he's making a habit of doing it over something so minor as this and supressing the evidence by destroying it, then dosent that A) Call into question his fitness as an officer?
B) Cast doubt on his truthfulness in a court of law?
C) Prove that indeed he really is a Richard Head?
I would suggest A, B and C. Get this plank out.
I lie all the time about minor things... because they are minor things.
Like, when asked "does my bum look big in this ?" the answer is of course " No " regardless of the truth.
Swilly said:
Deltaf01 said:
Swilly said:
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Its known as "lying". If he's making a habit of doing it over something so minor as this and supressing the evidence by destroying it, then dosent that A) Call into question his fitness as an officer?
B) Cast doubt on his truthfulness in a court of law?
C) Prove that indeed he really is a Richard Head?
I would suggest A, B and C. Get this plank out.
I lie all the time about minor things... because they are minor things.
Like, when asked "does my bum look big in this ?" the answer is of course " No " regardless of the truth.
This wasn't just a little fib, this was a deliberate press release to the national media that he knew to be untruthful, its purpose to allow him to save face.
Utter disgrace...sack him.
mybrainhurts said:
Swilly said:
Deltaf01 said:
Swilly said:
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Its known as "lying". If he's making a habit of doing it over something so minor as this and supressing the evidence by destroying it, then dosent that A) Call into question his fitness as an officer?
B) Cast doubt on his truthfulness in a court of law?
C) Prove that indeed he really is a Richard Head?
I would suggest A, B and C. Get this plank out.
I lie all the time about minor things... because they are minor things.
Like, when asked "does my bum look big in this ?" the answer is of course " No " regardless of the truth.
This wasn't just a little fib, this was a deliberate press release to the national media that he knew to be untruthful, its purpose to allow him to save face.
Utter disgrace...sack him.

The media can make anything turn into a circus. The public don't need to know everything.
Do you really think he wrote the press release himself? Do you not think there is someone who does PR for them? SO if anyone it should be there job to go,not his.
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff








r.
