Lawyers, mate about to divorce needs advice
Lawyers, mate about to divorce needs advice
Author
Discussion

MaxAndRuby

Original Poster:

6,792 posts

262 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
A mate of mine(really) is about to get divorced. He has a share of a company which he had prior to getting married. He believes that as the firm existed prior to him getting married, his wife will have no rights to any equity that he holds in this business. I'm sceptical, but offered to put it to the PH massive for their opinions.

Thanks in anticipation for any qualified views.

FPC

8,282 posts

252 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
MaxAndRuby said:
A mate of mine(really) is about to get divorced. He has a share of a company which he had prior to getting married. He believes that as the firm existed prior to him getting married, his wife will have no rights to any equity that he holds in this business. I'm sceptical, but offered to put it to the PH massive for their opinions.

Thanks in anticipation for any qualified views.
WRONG! It's all in the pot for division, even if obtained pre-marriage.

abdulaziz

656 posts

223 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
He's in for a rough ride

MaxAndRuby

Original Poster:

6,792 posts

262 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
FPC said:
MaxAndRuby said:
A mate of mine(really) is about to get divorced. He has a share of a company which he had prior to getting married. He believes that as the firm existed prior to him getting married, his wife will have no rights to any equity that he holds in this business. I'm sceptical, but offered to put it to the PH massive for their opinions.

Thanks in anticipation for any qualified views.
WRONG! It's all in the pot for division, even if obtained pre-marriage.
That's what I thought.

What happens if nearly all the guy's wealth is tied up in a company that he couldn't possibly liquidate in order to pay out?

Flintstone

8,644 posts

277 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
Is this the latest 'ab@ and Jenney' thread? wink

MaxAndRuby

Original Poster:

6,792 posts

262 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
Flintstone said:
Is this the latest 'ab@ and Jenney' thread? wink
Seriously, it's a real life situation!

Flintstone

8,644 posts

277 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
<Serious head on>

If it's that serious then wouldn't he be better off with a real, live solicitor rather than we pretenders of t'net?

FPC

8,282 posts

252 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
MaxAndRuby said:
FPC said:
MaxAndRuby said:
A mate of mine(really) is about to get divorced. He has a share of a company which he had prior to getting married. He believes that as the firm existed prior to him getting married, his wife will have no rights to any equity that he holds in this business. I'm sceptical, but offered to put it to the PH massive for their opinions.

Thanks in anticipation for any qualified views.
WRONG! It's all in the pot for division, even if obtained pre-marriage.
That's what I thought.

What happens if nearly all the guy's wealth is tied up in a company that he couldn't possibly liquidate in order to pay out?
Parties argue over a valuation (accountants for ach side) then agreed sum gets added to the overall pot.

MaxAndRuby

Original Poster:

6,792 posts

262 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
FPC said:
MaxAndRuby said:
FPC said:
MaxAndRuby said:
A mate of mine(really) is about to get divorced. He has a share of a company which he had prior to getting married. He believes that as the firm existed prior to him getting married, his wife will have no rights to any equity that he holds in this business. I'm sceptical, but offered to put it to the PH massive for their opinions.

Thanks in anticipation for any qualified views.
WRONG! It's all in the pot for division, even if obtained pre-marriage.
That's what I thought.

What happens if nearly all the guy's wealth is tied up in a company that he couldn't possibly liquidate in order to pay out?
Parties argue over a valuation (accountants for ach side) then agreed sum gets added to the overall pot.
That seems logical, but what if he can't pay and there is no-one who wants to buy his shares?

jeff m

4,066 posts

288 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
Not a lawyer, but.
I believe there is some protection for pensions.


FPC

8,282 posts

252 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
jeff m said:
Not a lawyer, but.
I believe there is some protection for pensions.
No - pensions are in the pot as well. In fact, they are usually very contentious.

Seight_Returns

1,640 posts

231 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
MaxAndRuby said:
That seems logical, but what if he can't pay and there is no-one who wants to buy his shares?
How is this any different from the thousands of poor souls getting divorced whose most significant joint possession is a house nominally worth £XYZk but in a market like today's with virtually no buyers and so no liquidity ?

MaxAndRuby

Original Poster:

6,792 posts

262 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
They also have a child together, anyone know of an average likely percentage split?

Olivero

2,157 posts

239 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
MaxAndRuby said:
... any qualified views.
Drop me an email if your want the details of my (Very) good London lawyer.

Flintstone

8,644 posts

277 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
MaxAndRuby said:
They also have a child together, anyone know of an average likely percentage split?
Arm and a leg each.

MaxAndRuby

Original Poster:

6,792 posts

262 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
Flintstone said:
MaxAndRuby said:
They also have a child together, anyone know of an average likely percentage split?
Arm and a leg each.
rofl

FPC

8,282 posts

252 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
MaxAndRuby said:
They also have a child together, anyone know of an average likely percentage split?
Impossible to say depends entirely on circumstances (financial and relationship).