German Super Tanks
Discussion
It's strange the way the war went down for the Germans really. It was mostly the result of bad leadership, they had all the right ingredients, well trained and loyal troops (and lots of them), vastly technically superior, generally better supplies.
But a nutter in charge.
And then after the war all the top scientists and technology got shared out between the Americans / British / Russians shaping the world for the next 50 years.
But a nutter in charge.
And then after the war all the top scientists and technology got shared out between the Americans / British / Russians shaping the world for the next 50 years.
Cool, but yes, a lumbering easy target unless you had air superiority or supremacy on your side.
I guess for defending important installations it'd be handy, a kinda semi-mobile fortress that could be re-deployed around a little bit, would make taking it out with artillery harder, or a bombing run etc... but it'd still be a key target.
Better to just build 50 normal tanks than one big one I suppose
Dave
I guess for defending important installations it'd be handy, a kinda semi-mobile fortress that could be re-deployed around a little bit, would make taking it out with artillery harder, or a bombing run etc... but it'd still be a key target.
Better to just build 50 normal tanks than one big one I suppose

Dave
madrob6 said:
Reminds me of something from a Command & Conquer game
They both do actually, the large artillery tank (from c&c 3) and the double barrelled monster (mamoth tanks from red-alert). :geek:I can't see how a gigantic tank can be that practical, it would be stumped the minute it came across an embankment.
Zod said:
They'd have been sitting ducks. The Allies had total air superiority at the end of the war.
Yah, but those things are cool! And if cool could have won the war ...Wonder what sort of thickness the armour would have been on those? Chuffing huge.
And the engines to make them move? Mahoosively powerful. Totally awesome boys toys. Call that a tank? Now *this* is a tank!!!!
Mr Whippy said:
Better to just build 50 normal tanks than one big one I suppose 
Dave
That's partially where they went wrong, building things like the King Tiger and Jagdtiger, and even the Tiger and Panther. They might have been really good tanks, but they couldn't build enough of them. They'd have been better off with going for numbers over superior armour/firepower, for which see the M4 and the T34 - not all that great, but cheap, quick and relatively easy to build, easy to fix and easy to keep running.
Dave
Mr Whippy said:
Better to just build 50 normal tanks than one big one I suppose 
As the Americans and Russians discovered. The Tiger was superior, but very few in number and very complex, so that if it broke down in the field, that was probably the end of it.
Looking at the above, there would be a thickness of armour that would defeat rockets and you'd need artillery or a naval gun to get through. In that case, and if the terrain was favourable, and you had enough fuel and it didn't break down... nope, it would be a T.Rex in a land of mammals.
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff
















