German Super Tanks
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Was chatting to a guy last night and he was telling me about the planned super tanks the germans were developing at the end of WWII.

I'd not heard about them byt apparently there was something in it

The p1000 ratte



artists impressions







and then the p1500 !!




clonmult

10,529 posts

239 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
I know this is wrong, but seeing things like this makes me wish the war had gone on a little longer. Awesome machines.

andy400

11,755 posts

261 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Wouldn't be much use, shirley? eek

How are you going to get it about, and get it to where the fight is!? Under it's own power? At about 10mph, destroying everything in it's path, and only doing about 10-20 miles between refuels.

A design project, but utterly useless.

Not Ideal

3,057 posts

218 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Wouldnt that just keep getting stuck..??

Cant use it in built up areas..??

MrV

2,748 posts

258 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Just a step on from the train mounted howitzers ,and in reality about as much good as a chocolate fire guard

paulmurr

4,203 posts

242 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
They are awesome, but as the allies had total air supremacy by that point these would have been easy meat for the rocket firing Hawker Typhoons and Tempests that were destroying the remaining German armour.

Adenauer

18,982 posts

266 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
I wonder how the people would get out of it were it to end up upside down? scratchchin

RicksAlfas

14,559 posts

274 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Is it a battleship with tracks?
biggrin

I must admit I like this oddball stuff too.
boxedin

clonmult

10,529 posts

239 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Not Ideal said:
Wouldnt that just keep getting stuck..??

Cant use it in built up areas..??
Of course they could be used in built up areas.

They'd just be a little less built up after they've been through.

andy400

11,755 posts

261 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
clonmult said:
Not Ideal said:
Wouldnt that just keep getting stuck..??

Cant use it in built up areas..??
Of course they could be used in built up areas.

They'd just be a little less built up after they've been through.
hehe

Zod

35,295 posts

288 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
They'd have been sitting ducks. The Allies had total air superiority at the end of the war.

DaveL485

2,768 posts

227 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Very cool.

Now all we need is CY88 to find a prototype under his garage LOL

madrob6

3,594 posts

250 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
They're bloody huge!

Reminds me of something from a Command & Conquer game

wildoliver

9,318 posts

246 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
It's strange the way the war went down for the Germans really. It was mostly the result of bad leadership, they had all the right ingredients, well trained and loyal troops (and lots of them), vastly technically superior, generally better supplies.

But a nutter in charge.

And then after the war all the top scientists and technology got shared out between the Americans / British / Russians shaping the world for the next 50 years.

Mr Whippy

32,453 posts

271 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Cool, but yes, a lumbering easy target unless you had air superiority or supremacy on your side.

I guess for defending important installations it'd be handy, a kinda semi-mobile fortress that could be re-deployed around a little bit, would make taking it out with artillery harder, or a bombing run etc... but it'd still be a key target.

Better to just build 50 normal tanks than one big one I suppose smile

Dave

scorp

8,783 posts

259 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
madrob6 said:
Reminds me of something from a Command & Conquer game
They both do actually, the large artillery tank (from c&c 3) and the double barrelled monster (mamoth tanks from red-alert). :geek:

I can't see how a gigantic tank can be that practical, it would be stumped the minute it came across an embankment.

clonmult

10,529 posts

239 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Zod said:
They'd have been sitting ducks. The Allies had total air superiority at the end of the war.
Yah, but those things are cool! And if cool could have won the war ...

Wonder what sort of thickness the armour would have been on those? Chuffing huge.

And the engines to make them move? Mahoosively powerful. Totally awesome boys toys. Call that a tank? Now *this* is a tank!!!!

andy400

11,755 posts

261 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
Better to just build 50 normal tanks than one big one I suppose smile

Dave
That's partially where they went wrong, building things like the King Tiger and Jagdtiger, and even the Tiger and Panther. They might have been really good tanks, but they couldn't build enough of them. They'd have been better off with going for numbers over superior armour/firepower, for which see the M4 and the T34 - not all that great, but cheap, quick and relatively easy to build, easy to fix and easy to keep running.

Simpo Two

92,943 posts

295 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
Better to just build 50 normal tanks than one big one I suppose smile
As the Americans and Russians discovered. The Tiger was superior, but very few in number and very complex, so that if it broke down in the field, that was probably the end of it.

Looking at the above, there would be a thickness of armour that would defeat rockets and you'd need artillery or a naval gun to get through. In that case, and if the terrain was favourable, and you had enough fuel and it didn't break down... nope, it would be a T.Rex in a land of mammals.

bigmac146

184 posts

218 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
I think it would have been an impressive sight, but like others have said would have been target practice for our boys in the air.