Buying into a house with family
Buying into a house with family
Author
Discussion

Mike400

Original Poster:

1,026 posts

261 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Wise or not?

Brother in law interested in buying a place, rather than renting.

He is fantastic with money, no worries there.

Basically I stump up the 20% deposit, and we get a shared mortgage for the remaining 80%.
Therefore at the outset I would have a 60% share.

The wife reckons if the brother in law then paid 60% of the monthly mortgage, we could call it 50/50 over time, or come to some other arrangement so he could up his share from the initial 40% to 50%.

Would be getting a solicitor involved, and signing a contract to the effect that neither party can decide to sell without mutual agreement, and we intend to keep the property for minimum five years at which point either party can opt out giving first refusal to the other party (i.e. option to buy out other party before going on market)

Are we completely stupid?

PS the reason I would be paying full deposit is to give him a chance to buy furniture etc, and he is covering legal fees.




R4PID

1,060 posts

275 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all

Vesuvius 996

35,829 posts

301 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Mike400 said:
Wise or not?

Brother in law interested in buying a place, rather than renting.

He is fantastic with money, no worries there.

Basically I stump up the 20% deposit, and we get a shared mortgage for the remaining 80%.
Therefore at the outset I would have a 60% share.

The wife reckons if the brother in law then paid 60% of the monthly mortgage, we could call it 50/50 over time, or come to some other arrangement so he could up his share from the initial 40% to 50%.

Would be getting a solicitor involved, and signing a contract to the effect that neither party can decide to sell without mutual agreement, and we intend to keep the property for minimum five years at which point either party can opt out giving first refusal to the other party (i.e. option to buy out other party before going on market)

Are we completely stupid?

PS the reason I would be paying full deposit is to give him a chance to buy furniture etc, and he is covering legal fees.
Nightmare waiting to happen.

Wait until he misses some payments which you have to make up, but he still goes on holiday with his wife.


Don't do it.

chris_w666

22,655 posts

229 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
If he is good with money why would he need your help? Also why would he be investing in an unstable market that most people say has not stopped falling.

Disaster.

TIGA84

5,606 posts

261 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Vesuvius 996 said:
Mike400 said:
Wise or not?

Brother in law interested in buying a place, rather than renting.

He is fantastic with money, no worries there.

Basically I stump up the 20% deposit, and we get a shared mortgage for the remaining 80%.
Therefore at the outset I would have a 60% share.

The wife reckons if the brother in law then paid 60% of the monthly mortgage, we could call it 50/50 over time, or come to some other arrangement so he could up his share from the initial 40% to 50%.

Would be getting a solicitor involved, and signing a contract to the effect that neither party can decide to sell without mutual agreement, and we intend to keep the property for minimum five years at which point either party can opt out giving first refusal to the other party (i.e. option to buy out other party before going on market)

Are we completely stupid?

PS the reason I would be paying full deposit is to give him a chance to buy furniture etc, and he is covering legal fees.
Nightmare waiting to happen.

Wait until he misses some payments which you have to make up, but he still goes on holiday with his wife.


Don't do it.
+1

It wont work. Trust me, just trust me.

I've got 60,000 reasons why.

Maxf

8,444 posts

271 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
Mike400 said:
PS the reason I would be paying full deposit is to give him a chance to buy furniture etc, and he is covering legal fees.
Surely he is better off buying furniture secondhand and in bits and pieces but owning more of his house (or paying an even bigger deposit)?

Jasandjules

72,626 posts

259 months

Wednesday 24th September 2008
quotequote all
It's a risk, but then so is life.