Whats to buy, Plasma or Lcd?????????????
Whats to buy, Plasma or Lcd?????????????
Author
Discussion

CGH

Original Poster:

14 posts

239 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
I,m looking at buying a new TV, got around £1200 to spend, not fussed if its 40 to 50 inch, but whats the difference between Plasma and Lcd? The young CHAV in Comet serving me said Plasma not as god as Lcd, and said it depends what we watch!! Any advive greatly appreciated.

firman

1,407 posts

222 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
Gotta go for l.c.d mate. The difference is plasma is gas filled so they do not last as long. A good quality l.c.d will last much longer. Try dabs.com for some good bargains

lazyitus

19,931 posts

295 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
firman said:
Gotta go for l.c.d mate. The difference is plasma is gas filled so they do not last as long.
That's bks.

HTH

eightseventhree

2,266 posts

233 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
Plasma all the way!

tbloke99

236 posts

290 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
I had a first generation Pioneer plasma bought in 2002. Completely burnt out screen by 2006. Have bought LCD ever since.

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
firman said:
Gotta go for l.c.d mate. The difference is plasma is gas filled so they do not last as long. A good quality l.c.d will last much longer. Try dabs.com for some good bargains
Cobblers! At that size PLASMA!!!

callyman

3,195 posts

241 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
Ive got a 40" LCD, but that's the limit i'd say.
Anything over 40" and it's got to be plasma. LCD is ok at larger sizes as long as your not sat close to it as it will look crap

carmonk

7,910 posts

216 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
LCD - slimmer, weigh less, don't get screenburn, don't break as soon as you pick them up, don't use excessive amounts of electric. Plasma - slightly better picture quality, on average.

Ebo100

506 posts

233 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
We bought a 42" plasma panasonic recently and the salesman set up a blue-ray player playing to a LCD and a plasma at the same time to let us see instantly the difference between the two. Plasma showed a much better picture in terms of resolution and the depth of the black background. Fast moving action shots were handled much better by the plasma, he brought our attention to the number plates of cars moving past the camera. On the LCD it was impossible to read the digits, but on the plasma it was crystal clear.

Ask your salesman if he can do the same for you. We thought the LCD had a good picture until we saw it back-to-back with the plasma. I had also heard of some of the myths about plasma not lasting and I think this was true about some of the earlier ones but many friends have had plasma TVs for a while now with no problems. yes

S7Paul

2,103 posts

263 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
Forget all the old stories about screen burn. Both LCD & Plasma screens (if good quality) are rated for about 100,000 hours these days and screen burn isn't an issue. The answer is to get a decent Plasma (e.g. Panasonic), especially if it's a large screen.

Allblackdup

3,312 posts

237 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
Definately plasma, especially at that size. In your budget look at the Panasonic PZ series.


Camby

64 posts

236 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
firman said:
Gotta go for l.c.d mate. The difference is plasma is gas filled so they do not last as long. A good quality l.c.d will last much longer. Try dabs.com for some good bargains

moles

1,858 posts

273 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
Panasonic or Pioneer plasma. LCD picture quality is nowhere near as good as Plasma to my eyes.

H_Kan

4,942 posts

228 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
All the usual crap about plasmas is always spouted. With modern plasmas, you'll be bored of the telly before the screen has used it's life.

Say you watch TV for 10 hours a day, then

10x7=70 hrs a week

70x52=3640 hrs a year

With Panasonic screens claiming atleast 60,000 screen life, so do the maths, it should last for years.

Screen burn is also nowhere near as big an issue as it used to be.

Without a doubt, at that screen size plasma is the way to go.

I recently saw a Panasonic 50" Viera 1080p for £1200 online with directtvs.com iirc.

trooperiziz

9,457 posts

281 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
Just go order this now

http://www.digitaldirect.co.uk/panasonic/th-50pz80...

It'll save you having to read through all the arguments and this is what you'll be buying in that price range at the end anyway...

fathomfive

11,223 posts

219 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
After asking a similar question not too long ago (yesterday I think), I'm going for a Panasonic TH- 42PZ81B

Rob.

17,911 posts

247 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
shout Plotloss, your thread has arrived (again!)

Nolar Dog

8,786 posts

224 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
I'd only go Plasma over 32".

"Re-gassing"... what a load of bks.

The Fly Fisher

205 posts

217 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
It's not as simple as that - you need to buy a screen size based on your viewing distance because if you sit too close (e.g. have a 50" for a three foot view!) it'll look crap regardless of the screen type.

LCD all the way though. Wouldn't touch plasma with a barge pole personally.

744ti

181 posts

218 months

Saturday 25th October 2008
quotequote all
Plasma's get nasty screen burn, which leaves a permanent image showing Jesus crying.

LCD doesn't make Jesus cry.