De-Mining the Falklands. The UK will miss a deadline.
De-Mining the Falklands. The UK will miss a deadline.
Author
Discussion

Red Firecracker

Original Poster:

5,346 posts

256 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Is anyone else a touch surprised by this story;

BBC Falklands Mine Clearance

Fray Bentos and his chums litter the place with land mines, get a bloody nose and are sent packing and the UK has to pay to clear up their mess. Now, as the government signed the Ottawa convention banning landmines in 1997 with a deadline to get rid of them that will not now be met, the UK will be seen as an international pariah.

Why aren't Argentina at least making some contribution to the clear up work?

It is nice to see the Falkland Islanders showing typical British style though.

Mike Summers spokesman for the Islands Legislative Council said:
"We're rather agnostic about this."

"Clearing the mines here is neither an economic nor a serious social issue," says Mr Summers.

"If the money they were thinking of spending here could be better spent in one of those areas where children are still getting their legs blown off… we would be more than happy with that."

DrTre

12,957 posts

261 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
I'm somewhat confused...an invading force whacks down a load of landmines then the rightful landowners are potentially vilified for not getting rid of them within a certain timescale?

Eh?

Apart from the threat to sheep and penguins, what's the problem?

ETA Credit to the local community too, and I do realise that it's a bit of a non event of a story, given that it appears the UK will be allowed its extension, but where is the logic in the whole thing anyway.


Edited by DrTre on Monday 24th November 10:09

Red Firecracker

Original Poster:

5,346 posts

256 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
DrTre said:
I'm somewhat confused...an invading force whacks down a load of landmines then the rightful landowners are potentially vilified for not getting rid of them within a certain timescale?

Eh?

Apart from the threat to sheep and penguins, what's the problem?

ETA Credit to the local community too, and I do realise that it's a bit of a non event of a story, given that it appears the UK will be allowed its extension, but where is the logic in the whole thing anyway.


Edited by DrTre on Monday 24th November 10:09
Exactly. We might as well ask Argentina if there's anything else they'd like us to clear up whilst we're down there.

collateral

7,238 posts

247 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Sheep + minefield = solution

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

280 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
The trouble is with the Falklands is that the ground is mostly peat bog.

The Argies slapped down millions of mines in various places, didn't keep much of a record of where, and to compound this lots of the mines sunk in the soft ground and have moved....only to resurface elsewhere.

Lots and lots of areas are cordoned of and it's not worth putting the time and resources into clearing them.

Edited by Cara Van Man on Monday 24th November 10:44

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

275 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
I think you will find that the Falklands is not the only part of the world where the process of mine clearance has been postponed, principally because it is something of a "dangerous sport". My understanding is that, for obvious reasons, mines are made as hard to detect as possible.

The current hope is that further advances in ground penetrating radar, scanning technologies (not unlike the advances made in luggage scanning after 9/11) and "seeing" robots will eventually enable the process of mine clearance to be carried out without human participation.

Red Firecracker

Original Poster:

5,346 posts

256 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
I fully appreciate the hazards and problems associated with clearance, my objection is the fact that 'we' are being made to pay to clear somebody elses mess. I really shouldn't be surprised I know, but we didn't put them there, Argentina did. Why are they not be made to (at least) cover partial costs?

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

280 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Red Firecracker said:
I fully appreciate the hazards and problems associated with clearance, my objection is the fact that 'we' are being made to pay to clear somebody elses mess. I really shouldn't be surprised I know, but we didn't put them there, Argentina did. Why are they not be made to (at least) cover partial costs?
Agree.

And they should pay me compensation for every time I have to go down to that god-forsaken crap hole.

mel

10,168 posts

304 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
They really aren't a big deal in the Falklands, all the risk areas are now fenced and signed, and with a few tiny exceptions have no impact on any population what so ever, yes sure a few edges of fields have slowly shifted but the permanant garrison conducts an annual rolling survey on all the areas and adjusts the perimeters accordingly. It may sound like a fudged solution but leaving them where they are for a couple of hundred years really isn't going to cause much hassle against the cost and risk of clearing them. Besides the Golf Course at Goose Green wouldn't be half as much fun if the out of bounds area off the fairway wasn't marked out with barbed wire and little red triangular signs wink

Red Firecracker

Original Poster:

5,346 posts

256 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Cara Van Man said:
And they should pay me compensation for every time I have to go down to that god-forsaken crap hole.
Shush, I'm trying to get the missus to take a job down there!

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

280 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
mel said:
They really aren't a big deal in the Falklands, all the risk areas are now fenced and signed, and with a few tiny exceptions have no impact on any population what so ever, yes sure a few edges of fields have slowly shifted but the permanant garrison conducts an annual rolling survey on all the areas and adjusts the perimeters accordingly. It may sound like a fudged solution but leaving them where they are for a couple of hundred years really isn't going to cause much hassle against the cost and risk of clearing them. Besides the Golf Course at Goose Green wouldn't be half as much fun if the out of bounds area off the fairway wasn't marked out with barbed wire and little red triangular signs wink
yes

thumbup

mel

10,168 posts

304 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Well alright I may have been a little misleading with the phrase "Golf Course" wink just incase anyone has come up with the mental image of the Col "H" Jones memorial backing onto the Belfry, what you've really got is 9 randomly bored holes in an area on peat bog, with the terrain like thousands of grass covered babies heads and a few flags scattered about, there's not much chance of them holding an "Open" down there hehe as Nick so rightly points out it's a st hole beyond comprehension.

RLK500

917 posts

281 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
I always thought that the incumbents of Her Majesty's Hotels would make perfect mine clearer's. Their opportunity to "give back" to society..............

G'kar

3,728 posts

215 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
RLK500 said:
I always thought that the incumbents of Her Majesty's Hotels would make perfect mine clearer's. Their opportunity to "give back" to society..............
And it wouldn't cost an arm and a leg either.

Well, not us, anyway.

DrTre

12,957 posts

261 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
With due apologies to mine victims

George: What should we do if we step on a land-mine?

Blackadder: Well George, standard procedure is to jump 200 ft. up in the air and scatter yourself over a large area

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
mel said:
as Nick so rightly points out it's a st hole beyond comprehension.
So Bradford, or Port Stanley. If you had to pick.... wink

edit:Fort---Port.... Just bloody well call it Stanley. Oh you have...

Edited by Munter on Monday 24th November 11:57

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

280 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Legend has it that when we re-captured Port Stanley our forces wanted to celebrate with a game of footy, but were worried that the town pitch was mined......so they put their prisoners to good use to ensure the pitch was clear hehe

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

233 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
collateral said:
Sheep + minefield = solution
Solution + bread + mint sauce = nice sandwich

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
collateral said:
Sheep + minefield = solution
Solution + bread + mint sauce = nice sandwich
Is a sheep heavy enough? The penguins are not supposed to be heavy enough to set them off.

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

280 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Munter said:
thinfourth2 said:
collateral said:
Sheep + minefield = solution
Solution + bread + mint sauce = nice sandwich
Is a sheep heavy enough? The penguins are not supposed to be heavy enough to set them off.
I've heard of sheep setting them off