Sacked over Gary Glitter e-mail
Sacked over Gary Glitter e-mail
Author
Discussion

PH_Scooby

Original Poster:

1,180 posts

226 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
deserved or just looking for a reason to sack some staff?

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20081124/tuk-staff-sack...

EDIT:- for John r




Edited by PH_Scooby on Monday 24th November 11:33

paoloh

8,617 posts

233 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Desrve to be sacked

john_r

8,354 posts

300 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
PH_Scooby said:
deserved or just looking for a reason to sack some staff?

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20081124/tuk-staff-sack...





HTH
hehe

davemac250

4,499 posts

234 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Oh, looking for a reason for a couple of things.

Getting rid of some, and for some cardigan wearing, lentil eating mong an excuse for promotion 'Oh look at what I did about those emails, aren't I great'

Or something like that anyway.

elle

2,056 posts

241 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
john_r said:
PH_Scooby said:
deserved or just looking for a reason to sack some staff?

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20081124/tuk-staff-sack...





HTH
hehe
rolleyes

Deserved

Dirty Boy

14,859 posts

238 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
fk me!

This is crazy, don't deserved to be sacked in a million years. I hope the 'offended' council worker is happy that several people have lost their jobs, and potentially families could be ruined based upon a 'joke'

FFS.

stuart-b

3,651 posts

255 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Bloody over the top to be honest - I know circulating an email with a dodgy image is 'slap on the wrist time', it was hardly porn, bad taste yes, but sacking 15 workers before Christmas in todays climate?

fking joke.

paoloh

8,617 posts

233 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Dirty Boy said:
fk me!

This is crazy, don't deserved to be sacked in a million years. I hope the 'offended' council worker is happy that several people have lost their jobs, and potentially families could be ruined based upon a 'joke'

FFS.
I'd normally agree but some were social workers FFS.

OJ

14,209 posts

257 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
I don't understand? Was the bag more than 56x45x25cm? No wait, it must have had more than 100ml of water in it

parakitaMol.

11,876 posts

280 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all



Monki

1,233 posts

220 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
I wonder if it's the "Chinese take away" one with an oriental kid in the bag?

If so it's very funny!!!

Shouldn't have sacked the workers for circulating it though, there's far worse going on in the government deserving loss of jobs than internet jokes FFS

davemac250

4,499 posts

234 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
paoloh said:
Dirty Boy said:
fk me!

This is crazy, don't deserved to be sacked in a million years. I hope the 'offended' council worker is happy that several people have lost their jobs, and potentially families could be ruined based upon a 'joke'

FFS.
I'd normally agree but some were social workers FFS.
Who come into contact with this sort of thing daily and in my experience adopt a dark sense of humour as a coping mechanism, same of BiB, Fire, Ambulance etc etc.

What you think because they can laugh at a photoshop of a sicko it impairs their ability to work? Now that gets a FFS.

trumpet600

3,527 posts

260 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
15 more for us to look after.

AnthonyC

520 posts

250 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Deserved to be sacked in these circumstances.

Offensive and pointless.

Mrs Fish

30,018 posts

287 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Whilst it is a bit sick I don;t think deserve to lose their jobs over it, a written warning maybe? In fact can they be sacked just like that over one instance?

paoloh

8,617 posts

233 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
davemac250 said:
paoloh said:
Dirty Boy said:
fk me!

This is crazy, don't deserved to be sacked in a million years. I hope the 'offended' council worker is happy that several people have lost their jobs, and potentially families could be ruined based upon a 'joke'

FFS.
I'd normally agree but some were social workers FFS.
Who come into contact with this sort of thing daily and in my experience adopt a dark sense of humour as a coping mechanism, same of BiB, Fire, Ambulance etc etc.

What you think because they can laugh at a photoshop of a sicko it impairs their ability to work? Now that gets a FFS.
They forwarded it on. That is the problem.

scotal

8,751 posts

308 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Mrs Fish said:
Whilst it is a bit sick I don;t think deserve to lose their jobs over it, a written warning maybe? In fact can they be sacked just like that over one instance?
If it counts a some form of gross misconduct, I bet they can.

Personally, i think its an ott reaction, both from the council, and from the fool who reported them.

davemac250

4,499 posts

234 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
paoloh said:
davemac250 said:
paoloh said:
Dirty Boy said:
fk me!

This is crazy, don't deserved to be sacked in a million years. I hope the 'offended' council worker is happy that several people have lost their jobs, and potentially families could be ruined based upon a 'joke'

FFS.
I'd normally agree but some were social workers FFS.
Who come into contact with this sort of thing daily and in my experience adopt a dark sense of humour as a coping mechanism, same of BiB, Fire, Ambulance etc etc.

What you think because they can laugh at a photoshop of a sicko it impairs their ability to work? Now that gets a FFS.
They forwarded it on. That is the problem.
And at what point does that merit sacking? Formal sanction, yes can live with that. How much has been spent training these people, how many ongoing cases will be affected?

That is if any social workers were sacked.

paoloh

8,617 posts

233 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
davemac250 said:
paoloh said:
davemac250 said:
paoloh said:
Dirty Boy said:
fk me!

This is crazy, don't deserved to be sacked in a million years. I hope the 'offended' council worker is happy that several people have lost their jobs, and potentially families could be ruined based upon a 'joke'

FFS.
I'd normally agree but some were social workers FFS.
Who come into contact with this sort of thing daily and in my experience adopt a dark sense of humour as a coping mechanism, same of BiB, Fire, Ambulance etc etc.

What you think because they can laugh at a photoshop of a sicko it impairs their ability to work? Now that gets a FFS.
They forwarded it on. That is the problem.
And at what point does that merit sacking? Formal sanction, yes can live with that. How much has been spent training these people, how many ongoing cases will be affected?

That is if any social workers were sacked.
You need to look at bigger picture here to. Council allow staff to circulate child porn pics.... I'd also think the parents of molested kids in the care of these people would be a tad upset.

Heskey

4,048 posts

222 months

Monday 24th November 2008
quotequote all
Over the top in my opinion.