So...
Author
Discussion

ShadowNinja

Original Poster:

80,063 posts

311 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
So, is this the correct usage or is it another dodgy americanism?

wendyg

2,071 posts

272 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
..a needle pulling thread

ShadowNinja

Original Poster:

80,063 posts

311 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
hehe Very good. I suppose you're one of those people who finishes the entire Times cryptic crossword.

Catz

4,863 posts

240 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
La, a note to follow sew(so) ...

wendyg

2,071 posts

272 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
I don't know what anyone else thinks, but it's a reasonable grammatical device in prose. 'So' followed by an aposiopesis, indicated by an ellipsis.

Needs context though.

ETA I don't think it's even a particularly American thing?

Edited by wendyg on Wednesday 26th November 01:19

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

284 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
So, should this be in the "Americans and buggered up English words" thread?

wendyg

2,071 posts

272 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
So, should this be in the "Americans and buggered up English words" thread?
If you believe that the Americans have ruthlessly ripped the word 'so' from our lexicon and twisted it to their own devices, then you should complain most forcefully.

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
wendyg said:
Blue Meanie said:
So, should this be in the "Americans and buggered up English words" thread?
If you believe that the Americans have ruthlessly ripped the word 'so' from our lexicon and twisted it to their own devices, then you should complain most forcefully.
"Forcibly".

Damn Yank...

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

284 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
wendyg said:
Blue Meanie said:
So, should this be in the "Americans and buggered up English words" thread?
If you believe that the Americans have ruthlessly ripped the word 'so' from our lexicon and twisted it to their own devices, then you should complain most forcefully.
I never said such a thing... But having TWO threads about language on website is more than enough! I'm having dictionary overload!

wendyg

2,071 posts

272 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
wendyg said:
Blue Meanie said:
So, should this be in the "Americans and buggered up English words" thread?
If you believe that the Americans have ruthlessly ripped the word 'so' from our lexicon and twisted it to their own devices, then you should complain most forcefully.
"Forcibly".

Damn Yank...
I have forcefully and forcibly in my OED, but the former has a more secure derivation. biggrin

wendyg

2,071 posts

272 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
wendyg said:
Blue Meanie said:
So, should this be in the "Americans and buggered up English words" thread?
If you believe that the Americans have ruthlessly ripped the word 'so' from our lexicon and twisted it to their own devices, then you should complain most forcefully.
I never said such a thing... But having TWO threads about language on website is more than enough! I'm having dictionary overload!
You started it, ner ner na ner ner.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
Ah...So

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
wendyg said:
Famous Graham said:
wendyg said:
Blue Meanie said:
So, should this be in the "Americans and buggered up English words" thread?
If you believe that the Americans have ruthlessly ripped the word 'so' from our lexicon and twisted it to their own devices, then you should complain most forcefully.
"Forcibly".

Damn Yank...
I have forcefully and forcibly in my OED, but the former has a more secure derivation. biggrin
Your long words won't work with me, young lady. Pff.

Bugger

wendyg

2,071 posts

272 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Ah...So
Do you mean in 'Ah.. so what is it you're talking about?'

or 'Ah.. so you are comparing the hidden reflexive statement which was implicit in the generative statement?'

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
wendyg said:
mybrainhurts said:
Ah...So
Do you mean in 'Ah.. so what is it you're talking about?'

or 'Ah.. so you are comparing the hidden reflexive statement which was implicit in the generative statement?'
Fix your teeth AND give you an english lesson.

Where do you practice? biggrin

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
wendyg said:
mybrainhurts said:
Ah...So
Do you mean in 'Ah.. so what is it you're talking about?'

or 'Ah.. so you are comparing the hidden reflexive statement which was implicit in the generative statement?'
Ah..so...ru are right sirry irriot, ru not speaky Engrish

wendyg

2,071 posts

272 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
wendyg said:
mybrainhurts said:
Ah...So
Do you mean in 'Ah.. so what is it you're talking about?'

or 'Ah.. so you are comparing the hidden reflexive statement which was implicit in the generative statement?'
Fix your teeth AND give you an english lesson.

Where do you practice? biggrin
I will never tell

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
Coward biggrin

wendyg

2,071 posts

272 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
Oh no, you will never find me, because you are not worthy.

I sorrow for you. :sigh:

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Wednesday 26th November 2008
quotequote all
wendyg said:
Oh no, you will never find me, because you are not worthy.

I sorrow for you. :sigh:
Aha! Now you betray your ill-education. "I sorrow for you?" Dear me.

wink

(actually, the world's best dentist couldn't do much for me anyway. Well, they could, but it would be well out my financial reach.)