At what point does promiscuity become misogony..?

[Ultraviolet]

Was thinking about this one the other day.. of the premier league shaggers I know - the type who are into the 100s - I wouldn't describe any as having a 'healthy' relationship with the other sex.

There not in the 'snake with tits' camp - there's no resentment there - there just seems to be an unwillingness / inability to form any sort of relationship. I wouldn't go so far as satyriasis / nymphomania (not in a good way), although we're probably fairly close... but certainly there's a general view of women as a commodity item (hence the misogony in the title, although maybe that is a bit strong)

At what point does this occur I wonder... and is it reversable? That is, if you've slept with 1000 can you ever go back to the same sort of relationship someone who has slept with 10?

Over to the PH deep thinking brigade...

UV

[Don]

Could you find "the one"? Sure?

Could you keep it in your trousers? No. I doubt it very much. Too much of a habit.

[308mate]

Im trying to break this exact cycle before it becomes irresversible for the exact reasons listed in both posts above. Seriously.

Edited by 308mate on Wednesday 26th November 16:58

[diablo_pete]

If a 1000 women would please form an orderly queue, I can come back with the definitive answer asap.

[Yugguy]

308mate said:

Im trying to break this exact cycle before it becomes irresversible for the exact reasons listed in both posts above. Seriously.

Edited by 308mate on Wednesday 26th November 16:58

Worst "Hey lads, I get lots of sex" post ever.

[Adrian W]

bit like smoking, how many a day is a bad habit

[s3fella]

Are you talking about promiscuous men or women here? You mention them treating women as a commodity (suggesting men or "munchers") but then mention "snake with tits" too, (suggesting they are women, and therefore maybe munchers too?)

All the long ony words I dont realy get as I was too busy shaggin when I was at school and Uni to learn anything! LOLs

[collateral]

Don't think there's a correlation.

Possibly just the oft debated chicks-like-arrogant-tossers thing?