Baby P Dr. suspended
Author
Discussion

Nolar Dog

Original Poster:

8,786 posts

224 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Just been on TV news that the Doctor that examined Baby P two days before he died, his been suspended by the G.M.C.


ShadowNinja

80,062 posts

311 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Why? Serious question. What is a doctor's role wrt such cases?

Edited by ShadowNinja on Thursday 27th November 13:57

singlecoil

35,831 posts

275 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
ShadowNinja said:
Why? Serious question. What is a doctor's role wrt such cases?

Edited by ShadowNinja on Thursday 27th November 13:57
Presumably noticing the various fractures, and asking whether that's ok or not?

Nolar Dog

Original Poster:

8,786 posts

224 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
ShadowNinja said:
Why? Serious question. What is a doctor's role wrt such cases?
According to the news report he (the Dr.) failed to spot that the baby had a broken spine.

Neil_H

15,418 posts

280 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
I thought this happened ages ago? The doctor's supension, I mean.

Zod

35,295 posts

287 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
exactly - a doctor examining a child with serious injuries, including a broken spine, as well as superficial ones that indicate abuse, should make a finding other than that the child was "cranky".

GreenDog

2,261 posts

221 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Nolar Dog said:
ShadowNinja said:
Why? Serious question. What is a doctor's role wrt such cases?
According to the news report he (the Dr.) failed to spot that the baby had a broken spine.
He was apparently paralysed from the waste down - I'd have thought any doctor should have spotted that

paoloh

8,617 posts

233 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
I agree the Doc should be suspended but how in God's name are those social workers still in a job???

MikeyT

18,386 posts

300 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
The doctor is one thing - the main problem is that stupid cow who is head of Children's Services at Haringey Council - here resignation should have been on CEO's desk the same afternoon as the child was dead .

FFS! Hanging onto her bloody pension is what that cow is doing.

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

262 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
The GMC get it right for a change. Almost didn't expect that.


But it seems the right thing to do- the silly woman diagnosed a child with broken ribs, broken back, and possibly paralysed as 'cranky'.

paoloh

8,617 posts

233 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Anyone else feel physically sick thinking about this?

scruffy

1,244 posts

295 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
GreenDog said:
Nolar Dog said:
ShadowNinja said:
Why? Serious question. What is a doctor's role wrt such cases?
According to the news report he (the Dr.) failed to spot that the baby had a broken spine.
He was apparently paralysed from the waste down - I'd have thought any doctor should have spotted that
God I love the internet!!!


mitzy

13,858 posts

226 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
They should all be sacked.


PHOENIXUK

2,200 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
If its proven he was negligent, he should be brought before the courts along with any others that can also be proven negligent for manslaughter. It is about time people took responsibility for there lack of action, forget not enough money, time etc. If people are not brought to book, no matter how many damn government enquiries we have the poor baby will have died for nought.

paoloh

8,617 posts

233 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
PHOENIXUK said:
If its proven he was negligent, he should be brought before the courts along with any others that can also be proven negligent for manslaughter. It is about time people took responsibility for there lack of action, forget not enough money, time etc. If people are not brought to book, no matter how many damn government enquiries we have the poor baby will have died for nought.
In cases of child welfare, much better to be criticised for something you have done instead of not done IMO

smilerbaker

4,071 posts

244 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
The Dr is a SHE.


rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
paoloh said:
In cases of child welfare, much better to be criticised for something you have done instead of not done IMO
Not always.

I know of a couple who, let’s be honest, are not the sharpest tools in the box, nice enough but the offer of a night out with them would find me making my excuses.

Their first child is fairly obviously developing a lot slower than his peers. Their second has been in and out of hospital since he was born with this and that.

Anyway the youngest (once they became a toddler) was constantly getting bruises appear for no reason at all. They had consulted their GP about this but no answers were forthcoming. One day the child fell over and banged his head and so they rushed to the hospital, knowing that firstly he seems to be very easily injured and also that it was quite a hefty whack.

They get to A&E, explain all and are seen by the nurse there. The Police arrive with social services and their eldest is taken into care on the spot with the toddler being admitted.

The father is accused of beating the children, despite there being absolutely no evidence of anything of the sort other than a toddler who bruises easily who they have regularly taken to the GP.

Within hours the nurses at the hospital are starting to refuse to handle the toddler as every time one of them picks him up he bruises.

9 months later the couple are finally allowed to have their children back. The eldest has started to wet and st himself constantly and will not go out of the house alone such was the standard of care he received and no form of apology of any sort has been forthcoming.

I have been to far too many case conferences to have much regard for a lot of members of social services. There are some excellent Social Workers out there, but they are far outweighed by their moronic, lentil knitting yogurt weaving colleagues who have all the theory, but none of the practice. Funny but guess which ones tend to be the best at their jobs? The clue is they have a 9 month lead into their lifetime of training…

paoloh

8,617 posts

233 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
rude-boy said:
paoloh said:
In cases of child welfare, much better to be criticised for something you have done instead of not done IMO
Not always.

I know of a couple who, let’s be honest, are not the sharpest tools in the box, nice enough but the offer of a night out with them would find me making my excuses.

Their first child is fairly obviously developing a lot slower than his peers. Their second has been in and out of hospital since he was born with this and that.

Anyway the youngest (once they became a toddler) was constantly getting bruises appear for no reason at all. They had consulted their GP about this but no answers were forthcoming. One day the child fell over and banged his head and so they rushed to the hospital, knowing that firstly he seems to be very easily injured and also that it was quite a hefty whack.

They get to A&E, explain all and are seen by the nurse there. The Police arrive with social services and their eldest is taken into care on the spot with the toddler being admitted.

The father is accused of beating the children, despite there being absolutely no evidence of anything of the sort other than a toddler who bruises easily who they have regularly taken to the GP.

Within hours the nurses at the hospital are starting to refuse to handle the toddler as every time one of them picks him up he bruises.

9 months later the couple are finally allowed to have their children back. The eldest has started to wet and st himself constantly and will not go out of the house alone such was the standard of care he received and no form of apology of any sort has been forthcoming.

I have been to far too many case conferences to have much regard for a lot of members of social services. There are some excellent Social Workers out there, but they are far outweighed by their moronic, lentil knitting yogurt weaving colleagues who have all the theory, but none of the practice. Funny but guess which ones tend to be the best at their jobs? The clue is they have a 9 month lead into their lifetime of training…
I see you r point completely but when a child is taken away. You would hope there is no further chance of abuse.
Would I take one family's misery over an unfounded accusation over a childs death??

ALawson

8,054 posts

280 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
scruffy said:
GreenDog said:
Nolar Dog said:
ShadowNinja said:
Why? Serious question. What is a doctor's role wrt such cases?
According to the news report he (the Dr.) failed to spot that the baby had a broken spine.
He was paralysed from the waste down - I'd have thought any doctor should have spotted that
God I love the internet!!!
EFA


Mr_annie_vxr

9,270 posts

240 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
rude-boy said:
paoloh said:
In cases of child welfare, much better to be criticised for something you have done instead of not done IMO
Not always.

I know of a couple who, let’s be honest, are not the sharpest tools in the box, nice enough but the offer of a night out with them would find me making my excuses.

Their first child is fairly obviously developing a lot slower than his peers. Their second has been in and out of hospital since he was born with this and that.

Anyway the youngest (once they became a toddler) was constantly getting bruises appear for no reason at all. They had consulted their GP about this but no answers were forthcoming. One day the child fell over and banged his head and so they rushed to the hospital, knowing that firstly he seems to be very easily injured and also that it was quite a hefty whack.

They get to A&E, explain all and are seen by the nurse there. The Police arrive with social services and their eldest is taken into care on the spot with the toddler being admitted.

The father is accused of beating the children, despite there being absolutely no evidence of anything of the sort other than a toddler who bruises easily who they have regularly taken to the GP.

Within hours the nurses at the hospital are starting to refuse to handle the toddler as every time one of them picks him up he bruises.

9 months later the couple are finally allowed to have their children back. The eldest has started to wet and st himself constantly and will not go out of the house alone such was the standard of care he received and no form of apology of any sort has been forthcoming.

I have been to far too many case conferences to have much regard for a lot of members of social services. There are some excellent Social Workers out there, but they are far outweighed by their moronic, lentil knitting yogurt weaving colleagues who have all the theory, but none of the practice. Funny but guess which ones tend to be the best at their jobs? The clue is they have a 9 month lead into their lifetime of training…
Then we have people demanding to know why action is not taken...

Its a very difficult area to work in due to implications of getting it wrong.

They are damned if they do damned if they don't.

I have many frustrations with the system (indeed the 9 month old child I took has gone back to the mum despite her being due in court for neglect) but I also understand that is an absolute minefield that many people are more than happy to negotiate after them but not with them.