The similarities between Robert Mugabe & Gordon Brown
The similarities between Robert Mugabe & Gordon Brown
Author
Discussion

Percy Flage

Original Poster:

1,770 posts

251 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
From Old Holborn, one of my favourite Blogs



Worrying.

Simpo Two

92,748 posts

294 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Only one difference I can think of - one of them throws out foreigners.

eccles

14,378 posts

251 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
reeeeeepost!

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Mugabe has nicer suits

hornetrider

63,161 posts

234 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
Mugabe has nicer suits
And two eyes

sleep envy

62,260 posts

278 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
and a nice MB 600S Grosser

Fittster

20,120 posts

242 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Old Holborn should at least remove the Guido Fawkes logo

http://www.order-order.com/2008/11/clunking-fist-s...

catso

16,435 posts

296 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Mugabe's not such a slimey liar ie doesn't pretend to care...

bimsb6

8,766 posts

250 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
they are both brown .

130R

7,083 posts

235 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
bimsb6 said:
they are both brown .
laugh

Established 1984

1,237 posts

214 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?

FFS we don’t have an elected president in this country. We elect a party to lead the country, and they choose a leader who becomes the prime minister. Blair wasn’t elected, Thatcher wasn’t elected, Churchill wasn’t elected.

It was fairly obvious at the last election that Blair wouldn’t serve out the term and Brown would take over with no general election being called. Why do people have such difficulty understanding that this is how it works? banghead

Edit for typo

Edited by Established 1984 on Sunday 30th November 13:54

fido

18,912 posts

284 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?
Yeah, i think Mugabe did get properly 'elected' at least once. thumbup

peterguk V6 KWK

2,622 posts

246 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
fido said:
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?
Yeah, i think Mugabe did get properly 'elected' at least once. thumbup
Easy if you're the only candidate and threaten anyone who doesn't vote for you with an early, painful death....

XitUp

7,690 posts

233 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?
No.

fido

18,912 posts

284 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
peterguk V6 KWK said:
fido said:
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?
Yeah, i think Mugabe did get properly 'elected' at least once. thumbup
Easy if you're the only candidate and threaten anyone who doesn't vote for you with an early, painful death....
He wasn't the only candidate from his first election, back in the 80s or before .. though i'm sure it wasn't a clean election from all parties involved.

carl_w

10,744 posts

287 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?

FFS we don’t have an elected president in this country. We elect a party to lead the country, and they choose a leader who becomes the prime minister. Blair wasn’t elected, Thatcher wasn’t elected, Churchill wasn’t elected.
True, but the generally accepted form in this country is that if the party leader stands down and somebody else takes over, a general election is called 'fairly soon' afterwards so that the new lad has a mandate from the people.

Although the only recent example I can think of is that John Major took over in November 1990 and the next election was April 1992, so that's about 18 months.

Marf

22,907 posts

270 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
TheEnd said:
Mugabe has nicer suits
And two eyes
And isnt a mouthbreather!

FourWheelDrift

92,299 posts

313 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
carl_w said:
Although the only recent example I can think of is that John Major took over in November 1990 and the next election was April 1992, so that's about 18 months.
He didn't need to because the whole country didn't hate his guts like the current incumbent who knows he will lose.

Puggit

49,800 posts

277 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
carl_w said:
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?

FFS we don’t have an elected president in this country. We elect a party to lead the country, and they choose a leader who becomes the prime minister. Blair wasn’t elected, Thatcher wasn’t elected, Churchill wasn’t elected.
True, but the generally accepted form in this country is that if the party leader stands down and somebody else takes over, a general election is called 'fairly soon' afterwards so that the new lad has a mandate from the people.

Although the only recent example I can think of is that John Major took over in November 1990 and the next election was April 1992, so that's about 18 months.
Put John Major's party did vote for him as leader.

There was no vote within zanu-Labour, Brown saw to it that no one dared cross him...