Northern Rock refuse to renew mortgage...?
Northern Rock refuse to renew mortgage...?
Author
Discussion

Dover Nige

Original Poster:

1,308 posts

272 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Hi all,

I have a friend that bought a house jointly with another friend.

They took their mortgage out with Northern Rock in March when everything was seemingly ok.

As they had no deposit due to various reasons, they took out a 95% mortgage and a further joint personal loan to provide the £5k deposit. House was £100k. Everything was going well.

Their fixed rate ends in March '09 and NR have written to them stating that they are not prepared to offer new terms and as such will not be providing a mortgage after March. They've never defaulted, never been late with a payment and haven't got any CCJ's or any other debt issues.

With house values dropping, they are lucky enough that the improvements they have made to the house will hold it's value around the £100k mark.

What can they do before March..? Can NR do this to them..? They've arranged to see a mortgage broker to try and sort something out, but are understandably worried with house prices still sliding. They are both in employment and have good credit rating.

Seems like Gordon's new acquisition is crapping on them from a great height to me.



Zod

35,295 posts

287 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
that seems very odd, given that almost all fixed rate deals are normal SVR mortgages with a fixed rate period at the beginning.

andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Highest I see them doing is 85%, but I didnt see when your friend took out the mortgage.

Fair to say 15-20% fall in price, so value of £80k? LTV of 85% of £80k = syntaxerror?

Neil_H

15,418 posts

280 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Dover Nige said:
Their fixed rate ends in March '09 and NR have written to them stating that they are not prepared to offer new terms and as such will not be providing a mortgage after March.
confused You mean they will be on a floating rate mortgage?

cptsideways

13,884 posts

281 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
I'd be putting the house on the market pronto

carmonk

7,910 posts

216 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
I'm not sure they can do this, although that's just based on the outrageousness of calling in a loan without reason rather than knowledge of the rules. That said, I suspect the scumbags will have it covered in the small print.

Edited by carmonk on Thursday 4th December 11:41

Big Rod

6,265 posts

245 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
This happened to a workmate of mine.

Came to the end of his fixed rate and while they didn't refuse, they made it very difficult to stay with them.

In his own words, he got 'raped' having to change mortgage provider.

I think they're just trying to claw as much money back as possible.

Mine's up in 2011. Just hope things are on the up by then.

Piglet

6,250 posts

284 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Dover Nige said:
Hi all,

I have a friend that bought a house jointly with another friend.

They took their mortgage out with Northern Rock in March when everything was seemingly ok.
What this March things were seemingly OK? Really?

curlie467

7,650 posts

230 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Got the same letter from them a while back, our mortgage is fixed till may `11 so wont be worrying yet.

scotal

8,751 posts

308 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
NR are not asking for their money back, they are refusing to offer a new incentive.
They would like your friends to remrotgage with a new lender.

Deopends what deal they have,they will most likely go onto SVR or a tracker over base. (Read the offer it will spell it out in there.

If they have a high LTV, then SVR is most likely their best bet at the moment.
It will cost them nothing to set up, and has no redemption penalties.

Are they in a position to overpay? If so, tell them to get on with it.

If they want a 2nd opinion on what the broker or NR say to them I'll happily run thorugh things with them.



carmonk

7,910 posts

216 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
scotal said:
NR are not asking for their money back, they are refusing to offer a new incentive
In that case it's a very different story! That needs clarifying because the OP makes it sound like they are withdrawing the loan.

scotal

8,751 posts

308 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
carmonk said:
scotal said:
NR are not asking for their money back, they are refusing to offer a new incentive
In that case it's a very different story! That needs clarifying because the OP makes it sound like they are withdrawing the loan.
Which might be what his friends think.

scotal

8,751 posts

308 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
That could do more harm than good...... indebtedness affecting affordability and all that.

Vlad.

1,086 posts

246 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Go to Citizens Advice Bureau with the letter. They'll probably tell you what it means, if it's legal, what steps to take next.

Edited by Vlad. on Thursday 4th December 12:36

Dover Nige

Original Poster:

1,308 posts

272 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
carmonk said:
scotal said:
NR are not asking for their money back, they are refusing to offer a new incentive
In that case it's a very different story! That needs clarifying because the OP makes it sound like they are withdrawing the loan.
thanks for wise words everyone, esp Scotal. (I have forwarded this thread on to my friend).

I will be clarifying the letter wording later on this evening with said friend.

I'm thinking that the letter is worded in such a way that it instigates the kneejerk reaction it has.

We shall see....

Edited by Dover Nige on Thursday 4th December 14:51

Dover Nige

Original Poster:

1,308 posts

272 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
Update:

Had a look at the letter and it appears the same as the one that Bahn-Stormer received.

It appears to me that the current mortgage will indeed drop onto NRK's SVR as opposed to being totally binned. However, towards the end of the letter it says that NRK regret that they won't be able to offer a deal on this mortgage. To the quick glancing read, it does "seem" that they won't be renewing, but after digesting the contents and explaining it to my friend, the initial worry that the letter brought has now subsided somewhat. It also suggests that the borrower should indeed look elsewhere for a mortgage.

A badly worded letter IMHO.

Thanks for all the advice and suggestions. The worry has subsided that they will be unable to get a mortgage, but with the values going pear shaped on so many houses and lenders asking for min 85% LTV for any fixed rate or tracker mortgages, how many people are going to end up on the SVR and completely in the st when the interest rates shoot back up (which undoubtedly they will)...?

It's a scary outlook for many.

BJWoods

5,018 posts

313 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
depending onthe terms of the mortage it @MIGHT@ be worth keeping it...

I have one when the fix runs out, reverts to +.95 over base...

Could not get that for love and money now (buy to let)

B

AndrewTait

1,849 posts

223 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
I'm just taking out a fixed rate mortgage, and the cost of the fixed rate is higher than the SVR (583 -v- 634), and that was before the rate cut this week.

The only reason I'm taking it is at least I will be able to budget for the first few years, knowing that my mortgage isn't going to change.

It is worth your friends checking this out, with NR, and other providers. Get a cheap SVR now, and as the rates increase, so will the availabilty of F.R. mortgages. Due to the mortgage being on the SVR, there will be no hidden penalties with moving to a F.R. at that time.