Sky
Author
Discussion

jamoor

Original Poster:

14,506 posts

244 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
What's the deal here?

15 minutes of advertising for every hour of viewing. A ridiculous £30+ subscription per month.

Endless choice of total crap on their channels.

Annoying Christmas ads.

Why do people still watch Television as it seems so dated in this day and age, surely just downloading it/iplayer/*.* is 100 times better, cheaper and more efficient?

Puggit

49,794 posts

277 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
You forget Sky+ - we watch everything on it, no live TV really. Skip the ads quite easily...

EvoBarry

1,903 posts

294 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Have to agree, I've been getting more and more annoyed with SKY myself, if it weren't for the fact we had the cheapest deal and its just so convenient sometimes I'd probably sack them.

esselte

14,626 posts

296 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
It just seems that everytime we turn it on it's an advert.....

MrV

2,748 posts

257 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Another +1 for Sky+ just watch everything 10 mins later and skip through the ads

jamoor

Original Poster:

14,506 posts

244 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
MrV said:
Another +1 for Sky+ just watch everything 10 mins later and skip through the ads
But you still have to pay for that! It's £10 odd per month if you don't have a £30 subscription.

We got rid of it 7-8 months ago,

DWP

1,232 posts

244 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Sky themselves have a word for what the OP described. They call it Churn. Or when the viewers realize that it costs them a fortune and bin it.

cobra kid

5,589 posts

269 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Buy a one off freeview hard-drive recorder. Pays itself off after just a few months. Plus you can take it from tv to tv from house to house.

miniman

30,040 posts

291 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
jamoor said:
But you still have to pay for that! It's £10 odd per month if you don't have a £30 subscription.

We got rid of it 7-8 months ago,
Stop paying, then, and get a Humax Freeview or Freesat PVR, then you get Sky+ style recording for free, plus the normal freeview channels, and top-up TV if you want more. Really don't understand why people moan about Sky but don't go elsewhere.

jamoor

Original Poster:

14,506 posts

244 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
miniman said:
jamoor said:
But you still have to pay for that! It's £10 odd per month if you don't have a £30 subscription.

We got rid of it 7-8 months ago,
Stop paying, then, and get a Humax Freeview or Freesat PVR, then you get Sky+ style recording for free, plus the normal freeview channels, and top-up TV if you want more. Really don't understand why people moan about Sky but don't go elsewhere.
I don't think all the boring asian channels in the 800s are on the freeview network

miniman

30,040 posts

291 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
jamoor said:
I don't think all the boring asian channels in the 800s are on the freeview network
Good reason to keep Sky then! That will be £5 please for my very useful advice hehe

Don

28,378 posts

313 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Sky + HD.

It's the way forward.

Anytime TV with no ads. If you record a programme with ads you can fast forward straight over the top of them at 32x. Barely notice 'em, really.

Yes I know I pay for the programmes but I least I don't have to put up with the annoying ads - given I NEVER watch ANYTHING live anymore.

I have a media centre PC for Freeview so I can do the same with that.

Who watches ads, these days? I know I don't. Other than at a speed where they barely register.

Sure. If you don't want Sky's content why pay? But if you DO? Why NOT pay for the system that means you never see ads again?

Oh.

Unless you like live football. Then you are fked. Sorry. But there you go. One could say it's karma. Personally I like the Golf and the fk me on that. Bummer but that's the price.


mattley

3,035 posts

251 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Not Sky but V+ here and it changes the whole TV thing from nothing on when I actually want to watch TV to excellent TV when I want it. I must admit that most of what I have lined up is available for free but I can't get a decent signal until the switch over so will probably go free dig in a couple of years but a time shift box is a must IMHO.

Simpo Two

92,716 posts

294 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Don said:
If you don't want Sky's content why pay? But if you DO? Why NOT pay for the system that means you never see ads again?
That's called the BBC isn't it?

jamoor

Original Poster:

14,506 posts

244 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Don said:
Sky + HD.

It's the way forward.

Anytime TV with no ads. If you record a programme with ads you can fast forward straight over the top of them at 32x. Barely notice 'em, really.

Yes I know I pay for the programmes but I least I don't have to put up with the annoying ads - given I NEVER watch ANYTHING live anymore.

I have a media centre PC for Freeview so I can do the same with that.

Who watches ads, these days? I know I don't. Other than at a speed where they barely register.

Sure. If you don't want Sky's content why pay? But if you DO? Why NOT pay for the system that means you never see ads again?

Oh.

Unless you like live football. Then you are fked. Sorry. But there you go. One could say it's karma. Personally I like the Golf and the fk me on that. Bummer but that's the price.
But i can download all of skys hd content! apart from the sports.

chris watton

22,547 posts

289 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Have you ever started watching a program on SKY, and the ads come on withing the first few minutes, and they go on for so long you actually forget what you were watching?

kprm77

417 posts

290 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Very annoying how they time the adverts to be the same time on different channels so you've got to go to BBC channels to avoid the ads.

I've been whinging about this for years as a Sky customer. Cannot believe they get away with charging £47 (or whatever) for the full package, whilst they're getting the advertising revenue as well.

Have just ordered V+, so no more Sky for me (or adverts!) biggrin

Sukh13

792 posts

214 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Anyone else annoyed that since Setanta has come along Sky Sports has a worrying lack of live games? This weekend there were 2 EPL games and none of them what I consider top notch

Mark-C

7,617 posts

234 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
Sukh13 said:
Anyone else annoyed that since Setanta has come along Sky Sports has a worrying lack of live games? This weekend there were 2 EPL games and none of them what I consider top notch
It's only chuffing soccerball ..... none of it's top notch



Edited by Mark-C on Monday 8th December 23:07

steve996

1,240 posts

244 months

Monday 8th December 2008
quotequote all
jamoor said:
MrV said:
Another +1 for Sky+ just watch everything 10 mins later and skip through the ads
But you still have to pay for that! It's £10 odd per month if you don't have a £30 subscription.

We got rid of it 7-8 months ago,
Don't think that is the case any more, I understand the Sky+ is free now providing you're a base package subscriber.