Quick legal question...
Discussion
Company A owes company B £100,000
Company B owes company A £200,000
Company A is overdue to pay Company B, therefore when remitting, Company B contra'd the amount outstanding and paid (within Company A's terms) £100,000 (The £200k they owed, less the £100k they were owed)
Can they do this?
Cheers
DB
Company B owes company A £200,000
Company A is overdue to pay Company B, therefore when remitting, Company B contra'd the amount outstanding and paid (within Company A's terms) £100,000 (The £200k they owed, less the £100k they were owed)
Can they do this?
Cheers
DB
rude-boy said:
Depends on if the TOB allows for offset, or more importantly, does not preclude it.
Okay, that makes sense, I doubt it's included, but I very much doubt it's precluded.It's a fairly substantial sum, owed for over 2 months now, they're notoriously poor payers, and given the current climate, we want our clients to protect themselves as much as possible.
Cheers.
FPC said:
Not much you can do about it. If you sue for the £100k owed, they can just counterclaim the same amount.
Well that's precisely why I think they can do it.If my client pays them the £100k they owe, net of the amount they owe them, there's a counterclaim eitherway, nobody would benefit.
The only reason I can see this being a problem is if the company are struggling cash flow wise, and that's why they are holding off payment.
My client is paying them well within their 30 day terms and conditions.
Dirty Boy said:
randomman said:
I wonder if the taxman would have anything to say on it too?
Why?MitchT said:
Dirty Boy said:
randomman said:
I wonder if the taxman would have anything to say on it too?
Why?As an aside what is the trading relationship? If i were the one owed the greater ammount i would just put the other company on stop unless they agreed to seting off the £100k against the outstanding amount and provided details of how and when they were going to pay the remainder off.
At the minute it seems to me it is still in the 'business' world, wheel, deal and get it done, rather than the legal field. Certainly I would not be setting off without agreement, how you get that agreement is down to the negotiation.
As for any tax isues i'll leave those to you old boy
At the minute it seems to me it is still in the 'business' world, wheel, deal and get it done, rather than the legal field. Certainly I would not be setting off without agreement, how you get that agreement is down to the negotiation.
As for any tax isues i'll leave those to you old boy

rude-boy said:
If i were the one owed the greater ammount i would just put the other company on stop unless they agreed to seting off the £100k against the outstanding amount and provided details of how and when they were going to pay the remainder off.
I've suggested that.rude-boy said:
At the minute it seems to me it is still in the 'business' world, wheel, deal and get it done, rather than the legal field. Certainly I would not be setting off without agreement, how you get that agreement is down to the negotiation.
We will contact them once someone more senior is available on their side. It's notoriously difficult to get anyone other than a monkey to talk to when dealing with large PLCs.rude-boy said:
As for any tax isues i'll leave those to you old boy 
Thanks, nice of people who haven't got the first idea of what they're talking about, telling me what can and can't be done. 
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


