Which Heart Rate Monitor Watch?
Which Heart Rate Monitor Watch?
Author
Discussion

ln1234

Original Poster:

848 posts

227 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all

Looking to get myself a heart rate monitor watch, and thought i'd ask you good folks at PH whether you have any real life experiences of owning one? I would mainly use it for tracking heartrate and calories during running etc, and wouldn't mind wearing it as a normal watch if it's not too bulky.

I saw this one one - stood out because it looks cool.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Polar-FA20M-Black-Heart-Mo...

cheers

clonmult

10,529 posts

238 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
That is pretty slick looking.

I've got a Polar FS2C. Does the basics of time and heart rate. As with most HRMs it works with the treadmills down the gym.

Depends on the features you want - some can download figures onto a PC for graphing/analysis. All i wanted was a basic, but accurate HRM.

sjg

7,674 posts

294 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
All you really need is display of current HR, and beeping at you if you hit the bottom or top of the zone you've set. I'm pretty sure all of the Polar range does this now.

Go Polar though, especially if you use any gym equipment - their stuff seems to work with just about everything.

ewenm

28,506 posts

274 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
I use a Suunto T6 with a FootPod for my training. Maybe a bit specialist for most though.

Mr E

23,035 posts

288 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
I bought Sarah a lesser Polar watch for Christmas. She has yet to use it.....

smile

dangerousB

1,701 posts

219 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
I've got the Forerunner 305 which I can heartily recommend.
It's a little bit bulky to wear as a watch, but for my money, a lot more useful as a training aid.
Inbuilt GPS gives you the ability to see exactly how far you've run, log peak speed, peak pace, average pace, speed/pace zones and log these over time, elevation and heart rate.
Very neat piece of kit!
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=142&pI...

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
I'm sure this is going to be a stupid question but do any of these heart rate watches work when swimming?

the_stoat

516 posts

240 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
el stovey said:
I'm sure this is going to be a stupid question but do any of these heart rate watches work when swimming?
The instructions usually state they don't, but I have tested mine the years and they have worked.

Nigel H

2,241 posts

239 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
I've got a Polar F6 and an F1 as well. The F6 works better for me as it allows me to see HR as I'm running. The one you're going for looks to do all the things you'd need.

I've had mine f6 for nearly 3 years so far and had no issues with it, as others have mentioned it hooks up with most gym equipment which can be useful.

Porkie

2,378 posts

270 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
dangerousB said:
I've got the Forerunner 305 which I can heartily recommend.
It's a little bit bulky to wear as a watch, but for my money, a lot more useful as a training aid.
Inbuilt GPS gives you the ability to see exactly how far you've run, log peak speed, peak pace, average pace, speed/pace zones and log these over time, elevation and heart rate.
Very neat piece of kit!
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=142&pI...
I've got that one as well... it works well but is horrible to wear I find. The newer ones are FAR better looking and locate satelites alot better as well apparently.

Aubrey

1,157 posts

225 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Worst 'Look at me I'm fit' thread ever!

In all seriousness, the Garmin watches are very good, they've recently released a new version which is smaller and actually looks like a watch, so you don't feel like a tit wearing it at the office/pub etc after a workout/run. HTH.

http://www.runnersworld.co.uk/news/article.asp?UAN...




Berlin Mike

311 posts

226 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Polar RS200. It's fine as a watch, easy to read and doesn't look like Darth Vader's helmet.

Get it with the footpod to measure the distance you've run too. It tells you your speed which is handy. It is good on the flat but very pessimistic when I run downhill. You can transfer your runs to the Polar website too, where it will add up your distances and keep tally of your fitness.


captainzep

13,306 posts

221 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
dangerousB said:
I've got the Forerunner 305 which I can heartily recommend.
It's a little bit bulky to wear as a watch, but for my money, a lot more useful as a training aid.
Inbuilt GPS gives you the ability to see exactly how far you've run, log peak speed, peak pace, average pace, speed/pace zones and log these over time, elevation and heart rate.
Very neat piece of kit!
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=142&pI...
Agreed.

My Forerunner helped me learn a lot about my running, is very accurate, and provides a useful log of your runs/performance via link with your PC. I don't wear it for every run, but its invaluable for when you get more serious about training and maintaining a pace for a given distance. If you have the time it has loads of additional training features e.g. intervals etc.

I keep my normal watch well away from my 'orrible sweaty exercising wrists.

ETA -Just don't let the batteries run out in the middle of a personal best mission.

Edited by captainzep on Wednesday 7th January 12:20

snotrag

15,627 posts

240 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
sjg said:
All you really need is display of current HR, and beeping at you if you hit the bottom or top of the zone you've set. I'm pretty sure all of the Polar range does this now.
A £15 HRM from Decathlon will do exactly that, (and more). Seeing as I bet many of these watches get bought, used twice, then locked in a draw, its a sensible idea.

Mark300zx

1,447 posts

281 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Or you could go for the samsung phone and heart rate monitor, came out top in the gadget show?

dangerousB

1,701 posts

219 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Yeah, it does take about a minute to acquire a satellite, but that isn't too much of a pain in the ass really. Still a decent piece of kit to analyse performance after you've been out though I must say.
My bruv's just got the latest version, so I'm waiting to hear how much better that is!!

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Garmin Forerunner 305 here. Too big for a watch!, but works well, picks up satellites within just a few seconds outside. HRM is good on it, plus the mapping etc is interesting.

Got mine from Amazon, for less then 2nd hand ones on auction sites!

clonmult

10,529 posts

238 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
dangerousB said:
I've got the Forerunner 305 which I can heartily recommend.
It's a little bit bulky to wear as a watch, but for my money, a lot more useful as a training aid.
Inbuilt GPS gives you the ability to see exactly how far you've run, log peak speed, peak pace, average pace, speed/pace zones and log these over time, elevation and heart rate.
Very neat piece of kit!
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=142&pI...
Any Nokia Symbian phone with built-in GPS can do that with the Nokia Sports Tracker application, albeit sans heart rate monitoring.

Although that may well be in the pipeline - Nokia are apparently working with Polar on a range of bluetooth compliant health-oriented products.

croyde

26,312 posts

259 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Do these watches also involve you having to wear a contraption around your chest, like the Polar I saw today?

Boozy

2,427 posts

248 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Anybody have an old watch they may wish to PM me about as I'd be interested in one, ideally one that tracks your speed, thanks!