Postal franking - lying bank?
Postal franking - lying bank?
Author
Discussion

matchmaker

Original Poster:

9,034 posts

229 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
My OH's debit card expired on 31st December. No replacement had arrived so on 31st December I enquired with her bank. After a bit of scurrying around they told me that the card had been sent out from the branch "around the middle of the month". They gave me a form for the OH to sign reporting a lost card, and when I returned it they stopped the card and ordered a new one.

Fair enough. Except that the "missing" card arrived in the post today in a plain brown envelope with a rubber "2nd" franking. There is no postmark and the only other marking on the envelope is two rows of red barcode-like markings on the front - put on by Royal Mail.

Now,I'm pretty damn sure that the bank haven't posted out the card when they were supposed to, and only discovered their error when I contacted them. In order to cover their asses they've then posted the card.

Is there any way to check the date of posting from the "barcodes"?

scotal

8,751 posts

308 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
She has a new card, why do you care?

chr15b

3,467 posts

219 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
this level of distrust i'd suggest another bank..

also, since when have branches been responsible for sending out cards? i thought it was all done centrally with the major banks?

matchmaker

Original Poster:

9,034 posts

229 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
scotal said:
She has a new card, why do you care?
She doesn't. She has had no valid card from 31st December and the "new" card is of course the "lost" one and was eaten by the cash machine when she tried to use it today!

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
How do you know this is the missing card and not the new/replacement one you ordered?

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Many big companies frank their own mail, then send it / get it collected, so the Royal mail don't "stamp" over the stamp to invalidate it.

No RM stamp, no date

Nickyboy

6,824 posts

263 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
The cards are automatically printed/sent out so the thing about the branch was b/s. The local branches have nothing to do with the issue of cards. Unless it has changed.

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Nickyboy said:
The cards are automatically printed/sent out so the thing about the branch was b/s. The local branches have nothing to do with the issue of cards. Unless it has changed.
The only time the branches get involved is if you have failed to receive a card on more than one occasion or your postcode area has a higher than acceptable risk of it disappearing en route.

But then the customer has to go to the branch to collect it smile

matchmaker

Original Poster:

9,034 posts

229 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
V8mate said:
Nickyboy said:
The cards are automatically printed/sent out so the thing about the branch was b/s. The local branches have nothing to do with the issue of cards. Unless it has changed.
The only time the branches get involved is if you have failed to receive a card on more than one occasion or your postcode area has a higher than acceptable risk of it disappearing en route.

But then the customer has to go to the branch to collect it smile
The branch claimed that the card was sent out from there because of problems with previous cards going missing - not to us, I assume, as this has never happened before, but possibly to other customers in the area.

The card was sent in a plain, brown, handwritten envelope.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Meh, quit moaning.

Plain brown envelopes attract less attention, and for 2nd class letters to take ages over christmas isn't that strange.

Think of the motive.
They forget, you say it may be lost, they agree it must be lost, and they cancel it.
Everyone is happy, the perfect alibi.

Now, would you then send out the cancelled card, after ringing Reg the postmaster, giving him the secret handshake and asking him not to frank the letter so they don't figure out you sent a cancelled card after it was cancelled and after the case was closed?

Or is it more likely to be 2nd class letters were delayed?

matchmaker

Original Poster:

9,034 posts

229 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
They said it was posted mid-December. Notwithstanding Christmas mail, it took more than three weeks. And miraculously arrived a week after we queried non-delivery.

Of course, we all know to trust banks, don't we biggrin

Pferdestarke

7,192 posts

216 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
A bit fishy, this.

rich1231

17,340 posts

289 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
They said it was posted mid-December. Notwithstanding Christmas mail, it took more than three weeks. And miraculously arrived a week after we queried non-delivery.

Of course, we all know to trust banks, don't we biggrin
More than an internet conspiracy nut that thinks the banks are in cahoots with the postal system to deprive him of a debit card with a picture of a muppet on.

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

239 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
rich1231 said:
matchmaker said:
They said it was posted mid-December. Notwithstanding Christmas mail, it took more than three weeks. And miraculously arrived a week after we queried non-delivery.

Of course, we all know to trust banks, don't we biggrin
More than an internet conspiracy nut that thinks the banks are in cahoots with the postal system to deprive him of a debit card with a picture of a muppet on.
At least PCI-DSS will ensure any fraud is comitted securely