WOMAN = SINGULAR. WOMEN = PLURAL
WOMAN = SINGULAR. WOMEN = PLURAL
Author
Discussion

parakitaMol.

Original Poster:

11,876 posts

280 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
AND

THE PLURAL OF SOMETHING (MORE THAN ONE) DOES NOT NEED AN APOSTROPHE!



Sweet baby Jesus and all the orphans.

Neil_H

15,418 posts

280 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Thank's!

oobster

7,677 posts

240 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Neil_H said:
Thank's!
laugh

Boozy

2,427 posts

248 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
another example women's lib gone made

yorky500

1,715 posts

220 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
oobster said:
Neil_H said:
Thank's!
laugh
laugh have another

colonel c

8,048 posts

268 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
The Women's Institute might disagree there.



Edited by colonel c on Monday 12th January 14:54

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Unless it's a certain type of adult female, in which case the plural is "wimmin".

oilandwater

1,427 posts

219 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
parakitaMol. said:
AND

THE PLURAL OF SOMETHING (MORE THAN ONE) DOES NOT NEED AN APOSTROPHE!



Sweet baby Jesus and all the orphans.
ok. right. and just to annoy you....confused

rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Some bird's obviously on rag week then wink

Poledriver

29,576 posts

223 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Has somebody rattled your cage today?

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

273 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
colonel c said:
The Women's Institute
Is the possesive of a plural, that does not end in 's'.

colonel c said:
might disagree there.
So they probably wouldn't; they would probably prefer 'disagree' spelt correctly though.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

246 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
SOmeone should put there breaks on this thred.

navier_stokes

948 posts

228 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
When's the Pie & Piston to be renamed the Spelling Forum? wink

Piersman2

6,676 posts

228 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
parakitaMol. said:
AND

THE PLURAL OF SOMETHING (MORE THAN ONE) DOES NOT NEED AN APOSTROPHE!



Sweet baby Jesus and all the orphans.
All the orphans what?

Hee hee smile

parakitaMol.

Original Poster:

11,876 posts

280 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Neil_H said:
Thank's!
Hush your pretty little mouth Neil.

It's for the common good.


TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

279 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Look what happens when we give them posting rights.

parakitaMol.

Original Poster:

11,876 posts

280 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Yes.

Only because nobody would ever chain themselves to your railings.

Edited by parakitaMol. on Monday 12th January 14:52

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Hang on a minute:

WOMAN = Streetwalker
WOMEN = Brothel

Thats better.... getmecoat

parakitaMol.

Original Poster:

11,876 posts

280 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
But thankfully (for you) I can spot the difference between a typo and being more than a bit thick.

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Monday 12th January 2009
quotequote all
Piersman2 said:
parakitaMol. said:
AND

THE PLURAL OF SOMETHING (MORE THAN ONE) DOES NOT NEED AN APOSTROPHE!



Sweet baby Jesus and all the orphans.
All the orphans what?

Hee hee smile
You're new at this punctuation lark, aren't you?