Samuel Windsor Shoes
Author
Discussion

Grand Fromage

Original Poster:

1,518 posts

236 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Are they any good, got a leaflet in todays Observer saying I can buy 2 pairs for £60 saving £140. Are they any good or will they just quickly turn into tat?


Hard-Drive

4,291 posts

258 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
They are OK for the money, but don't expect flawless construction. If you have 2 pairs and alternate and keep them on trees etc they'll be OK. In fairness mine do a lot in the car, not sure what they'd be like if you had a commute round London each day.

Mine came up quite small so order a bit bigger than usual.

MrV

2,748 posts

257 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
I am sure there was a thread about them last week that didn't rate them ,but the search is up the creek again so can't find it

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
MrV said:
I am sure there was a thread about them last week that didn't rate them
Correct and correct.

OllieC

3,816 posts

243 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
you get what you pay for.

personally i would be embarrased to be seen wearing them

Gaspode

4,167 posts

225 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
OllieC said:
personally i would be embarrased to be seen wearing them
Fortunately, my mates don't pass negative judgements on me because of my choice of shoe, and my clients couldn't care less what I wore on my feet so long as they look reasonable. I use SW shoes for work, I find them smart enough snd cheap enough, 2 pairs last a year, they're fine.


Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

277 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
They are OK for dossing around in shoes, instead of trainers. But at £30 a pair, they are only just worth it. They are also very inconsistent in terms of quality, one pair might be fine, whilst another will be utter garbage and you would begrudge paying a tenner for. The soles are the nastiest cheapest aspect of them too, whilst sometimes the uppers can be surprisingly good.

Having said that, the real thing from a proper marque is £100 - £300 a pair, so what do you expect? Look at them as 'fake' in the same way you might do a knock off wrist watch.

Edited by Balmoral Green on Sunday 18th January 16:09

OllieC

3,816 posts

243 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Gaspode said:
OllieC said:
personally i would be embarrased to be seen wearing them
Fortunately, my mates don't pass negative judgements on me because of my choice of shoe, and my clients couldn't care less what I wore on my feet so long as they look reasonable. I use SW shoes for work, I find them smart enough snd cheap enough, 2 pairs last a year, they're fine.
No doubt some of the products i buy / use / wear / eat etc would have you react in a similar manner " wouldnt be seen dead buying that "

I dont give a toss what anyone else thinks or says about my appearance, I just have a personal taste for slightly more upmarket shoes.. wouldnt judge anyone else on their choices.

they are st though wink

paddyhasneeds

67,306 posts

239 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
They seem a bit like those adverts for Klaus Von Zeitgeist watches you see in the Sundays - always on sale with 50% off with a "normal" price that nobody would ever pay and that I'd expect nobody ever has paid.

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

277 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
I think the thing to do is not compare or confuse them with proper shoes which is what their marketing is trying to do. If you look at them as an equally cheap alternative to the plastic vinyl things made in China that you get at Bacons, they are fine.

Shaw Tarse

31,887 posts

232 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Grand Fromage said:
Are they any good, got a leaflet in todays Observer saying I can buy 2 pairs for £60 saving £140. Are they any good or will they just quickly turn into tat?
Think these have been dicussed before?
I don't think I'd bother, if I'm right this "offer" is as common as a DFS sale wink

Nicholas Blair

4,111 posts

313 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
You'd be better throwing away thier shoes and using the boxes.

Gaspode

4,167 posts

225 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
OllieC said:
Gaspode said:
OllieC said:
personally i would be embarrased to be seen wearing them
Fortunately, my mates don't pass negative judgements on me because of my choice of shoe, and my clients couldn't care less what I wore on my feet so long as they look reasonable. I use SW shoes for work, I find them smart enough snd cheap enough, 2 pairs last a year, they're fine.
No doubt some of the products i buy / use / wear / eat etc would have you react in a similar manner " wouldnt be seen dead buying that "

I dont give a toss what anyone else thinks or says about my appearance, I just have a personal taste for slightly more upmarket shoes.. wouldnt judge anyone else on their choices.

they are st though wink
Fair enough. The thing is to treat them for what they are (a 30 quid pair of cheap shoes) rather than what they would have you believe they are (hand-crafted masterpieces). I see not point spending money on stuff I only wear to the office, and they a rebetter than the usual nonsense you get for that price. But agreed, Loakes/Churches/Crockett and Jones have nothing to worry about smile

Cpt Stirling

321 posts

230 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
I bought a pair of suede brogues and they are.....poor. I won't be buying any more.