Under Cover Princes
Author
Discussion

petrol_penelope

Original Poster:

924 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Have any of you watch it??

Although it is a very good programme to watch I can't help when watching it last night, that what the Indian Prince was doing was highly inappropriate
1) to be filmed
and
2)to actually let him behave the way he did with the alleged status he holds,

I don't agree with what the other prices where saying being that he should give-up his right to throne as sexuality should not come into it at all, but I just think he could have showed a little decorum and not been so ....(hmmm whats the word) Slutish.

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
What did he do?

Hoppy2008

2,496 posts

224 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
petrol_penelope said:
Have any of you watch it??

Although it is a very good programme to watch I can't help when watching it last night, that what the Indian Prince was doing was highly inappropriate
1) to be filmed
and
2)to actually let him behave the way he did with the alleged status he holds,

I don't agree with what the other prices where saying being that he should give-up his right to throne as sexuality should not come into it at all, but I just think he could have showed a little decorum and not been so ....(hmmm whats the word) Slutish.
I thought the exact same thing. Same words and everything.

Adenauer

18,982 posts

265 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
V8mate said:
What did he do?
Take it up the arse smile

Simpo Two

92,680 posts

294 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Having a TV camera pointing at you is not my idea of 'under cover'!

B3Svert

553 posts

221 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I agree, although to be fair on him he's led a very sheltered life so far and so dropping him in Brighton is like letting a kid loose in a sweet shop.

Comment from Prince of Jaffna: "If my son did that I would have him executed!" bit harse IMO, ground him for a month but let him keep his head wink

petrol_penelope

Original Poster:

924 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I have no problem with people who are gay are what they choose to do.

however he had never had a gay experience met a fellow gay and eventually went back to where the princes where staying they then went to the b-room and the crew also followed and filmed them licking cream of each other fondeling and other things he then went on to say when this bloke had left that he would like to experiment with women as he had NEVER been in contact with a womena in any kind of way, Watched a porn film and the crew again filmed him touching himself up almost at the brink, i must add you don't see his bits it is all done with his clothes on.

No my point is THE CREW should have given him the privacy he deserves to enjoy what he is doing and not to exploit him to the viewing of other just because he is of royal status.

Simpo Two

92,680 posts

294 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
So... you thought it was distasteful, but watched every second of it and then blamed it on the film crew?

mechsympathy

58,546 posts

284 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
petrol_penelope said:
No my point is THE CREW should have given him the privacy he deserves to enjoy what he is doing and not to exploit him to the viewing of other just because he is of royal status.
You do realise that's how reality TV works.

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
petrol_penelope said:
I have no problem with people who are gay are what they choose to do.

however he had never had a gay experience met a fellow gay and eventually went back to where the princes where staying they then went to the b-room and the crew also followed and filmed them licking cream of each other fondeling and other things he then went on to say when this bloke had left that he would like to experiment with women as he had NEVER been in contact with a womena in any kind of way, Watched a porn film and the crew again filmed him touching himself up almost at the brink, i must add you don't see his bits it is all done with his clothes on.

No my point is THE CREW should have given him the privacy he deserves to enjoy what he is doing and not to exploit him to the viewing of other just because he is of royal status.
A camera crew waiting in a corridor for the duration of the programme probably wouldn't have kept your attention too long though. And then there wouldn't have been anyone watching it.

BigLepton

5,042 posts

230 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
The only thing worse than a voyeur, is a voyeur who complains about the morality of what they just watched after it finished. hehe

petrol_penelope

Original Poster:

924 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
V8mate said:
petrol_penelope said:
I have no problem with people who are gay are what they choose to do.

however he had never had a gay experience met a fellow gay and eventually went back to where the princes where staying they then went to the b-room and the crew also followed and filmed them licking cream of each other fondeling and other things he then went on to say when this bloke had left that he would like to experiment with women as he had NEVER been in contact with a womena in any kind of way, Watched a porn film and the crew again filmed him touching himself up almost at the brink, i must add you don't see his bits it is all done with his clothes on.

No my point is THE CREW should have given him the privacy he deserves to enjoy what he is doing and not to exploit him to the viewing of other just because he is of royal status.
A camera crew waiting in a corridor for the duration of the programme probably wouldn't have kept your attention too long though. And then there wouldn't have been anyone watching it.
Yes you are right however what is wrong with the turning the attention to the other princes.

petrol_penelope

Original Poster:

924 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
So... you thought it was distasteful, but watched every second of it and then blamed it on the film crew?
well the film crew would have been driected by the director and him by the producer.

mechsympathy

58,546 posts

284 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
petrol_penelope said:
Yes you are right however what is wrong with the turning the attention to the other princes.
They probably weren't exploring their new found freedoms.

Hoppy2008

2,496 posts

224 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
petrol_penelope said:
Simpo Two said:
So... you thought it was distasteful, but watched every second of it and then blamed it on the film crew?
driected by the director
are you sure?

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
petrol_penelope said:
V8mate said:
petrol_penelope said:
I have no problem with people who are gay are what they choose to do.

however he had never had a gay experience met a fellow gay and eventually went back to where the princes where staying they then went to the b-room and the crew also followed and filmed them licking cream of each other fondeling and other things he then went on to say when this bloke had left that he would like to experiment with women as he had NEVER been in contact with a womena in any kind of way, Watched a porn film and the crew again filmed him touching himself up almost at the brink, i must add you don't see his bits it is all done with his clothes on.

No my point is THE CREW should have given him the privacy he deserves to enjoy what he is doing and not to exploit him to the viewing of other just because he is of royal status.
A camera crew waiting in a corridor for the duration of the programme probably wouldn't have kept your attention too long though. And then there wouldn't have been anyone watching it.
Yes you are right however what is wrong with the turning the attention to the other princes.
I don't know. I haven't got a clue what this thread is about biggrin

petrol_penelope

Original Poster:

924 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Hoppy2008 said:
petrol_penelope said:
Simpo Two said:
So... you thought it was distasteful, but watched every second of it and then blamed it on the film crew?
driected by the director
are you sure?
What that a director directs??

Yea Im sure thats what they do. confused

SleeperCell

5,591 posts

271 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
LOL @ the expectation of moral standards from a reality tv show.

They'd set their own mothers on fire if they thought it would get better ratings.

Hoppy2008

2,496 posts

224 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
petrol_penelope said:
Hoppy2008 said:
petrol_penelope said:
Simpo Two said:
So... you thought it was distasteful, but watched every second of it and then blamed it on the film crew?
driected by the director
are you sure?
What that a director directs??

Yea Im sure thats what they do. confused
I'm only pullin ya leg wink

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

279 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
petrol_penelope said:
Simpo Two said:
So... you thought it was distasteful, but watched every second of it and then blamed it on the film crew?
well the film crew would have been driected by the director and him by the producer.
It's like having a discussion with David Brent rofl