Best Examine your hard drives for "Extreme P**n" NOW!

[RegMolehusband]

Because in 15 minutes time it will become illegal to possess pictures that our beloved government regards as "extreme pornography". Yet more legislation........

see here

[OllieWinchester]

Might as well just throw my PC away then....

[mybrainhurts]

Have I got this right....?

Shagging sheep is out...

But shagging a Range Rover is ok...?

[ccr32]

The Register said:

Some stuff

For those of you who are too busy looking at porn to read the whole article, the definition of "extreme porn" is:

pictures will fall foul of the new law if four components are present. The pic must be pornographic, or produced for sexual purposes. It must be realistic. It must contain certain specific imagery, including necrophilia, bestiality, activity depicting serious harm to breast, anus or genitals or life-threatening activity. Finally, it must be grossly offensive, as determined either by a jury or magistrate.

Carry on.

[Eric Mc]

It's all part of the government plan to free up more hard drive space.

Of course, "Soft Porn" is only kept on "soft drives" - such as floppy discs.

I don't know much about computers.

[Badgerboy]

Hmm, its still there now, and I have a feeling it will still be there tomorrow. Why do they insist on pushing these useless and vague laws upon us? A video with a young lady trying to insert a unfeasibly large dildo into herself? "Well she looks mildly distressed, so we are locking you up for the night you sick bd!"

Thinking about it, are the BDSM crowd going to be a little peeved about this? I suppose if they beat each other senseless without taking pictures it'll be okay.......

Edited by Badgerboy on Sunday 25th January 23:57

[Curry Burns]

Not in Scotland though.

[svm]

Oh cock.

Not that I mean cock is on the pc, it's not... really... Oh bks. Not that there's bks on there either... Oh fk it, I give it up

[Fittster]

This was introduced in response to the killing of that girl with the st haircut. She was suffocated as I recall yet the banned list doesn't appear to include erotic asphyxiation.

[ccr32]

Fittster said:

This was introduced in response to the killing of that girl with the st haircut. She was suffocated as I recall yet the banned list doesn't appear to include erotic asphyxiation.

Michael Hutchins fans are safe then.

[Hedders]

Curry Burns said:

Not in Scotland though.

Or any where else in the world. I wonder what the rules say about accessing a hard drive that is not in England.

[mybrainhurts]

If it's going to stop depravity like his, I'm all for it....

[Fittster]

Gazboy said:

Fittster said:

This was introduced in response to the killing of that girl with the st haircut. She was suffocated as I recall yet the banned list doesn't appear to include erotic asphyxiation.

I think it does. Essentialy the important bits of this legislation is realism, insertion of sharps, mutilation, and the viewing of necrophelia and beastiality.

Suffocating someone, doesn't involve inserting sharpe objects, multilation, necrophelia (assuming you remove the pressure before they drop dead) or beastiality.

[Badgerboy]

Gazboy said:

Fittster said:

This was introduced in response to the killing of that girl with the st haircut. She was suffocated as I recall yet the banned list doesn't appear to include erotic asphyxiation.

I think it does. Essentialy the important bits of this legislation is realism, insertion of sharps, mutilation, and the viewing of necrophelia and beastiality.

Edited by Gazboy on Monday 26th January 00:10

Yes there is no need now, as the BBFC are always approving films with this content and punting it out. Some of the stuff they show in the cinema now.... Christ!

So, if your a social misfit, watching a 'Saw' film in your local cinema, and find your self getting hard, make sure you turn yourself in immediately. If you don't get turned on, then stay and watch the next fun disembowling!

[Glassman]

mybrainhurts said:

Have I got this right....?

Shagging sheep is out...

But shagging a Range Rover is ok...?

Get rid of the Rangie and put the sheep in the garage.

[RegMolehusband]

Why has the topic title been censored by putting by putting a couple of asterisks in the word, I hardly dare type it now, "porn"!!?? That's a bit zealous isn't it?

[Ed.]

ccr32 said:

The Register said:

Some stuff

For those of you who are too busy looking at porn to read the whole article, the definition of "extreme porn" is:

pictures will fall foul of the new law if four components are present. The pic must be pornographic, or produced for sexual purposes. It must be realistic. It must contain certain specific imagery, including necrophilia, bestiality, activity depicting serious harm to breast, anus or genitals or life-threatening activity. Finally, it must be grossly offensive, as determined either by a jury or magistrate.

Carry on.

Guess that depends where you pick the jury, as with every other new law everything they say to promote it sounds ok, just the vagueness and things they don't say that are worrying.
Would this be enough to get mosley put away?

Edited by Ed. on Monday 26th January 00:18

[Glassman]

So that clip of making your own McFlurry is a no go then?

[MrV]

Glassman said:

So that clip of making your own McFlurry is a no go then?

No your in clear if scat floats your boat

[Funk]

Why is this not applicable in Scotland? If it's instigated here and in Wales, it should be in Scotland too.

Why the disparity? Someone should check Gordon's PC at his home in Scotland.