Giant Snake Discovered!
Giant Snake Discovered!
Author
Discussion

Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,580 posts

308 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7868588.stm

40 plus feet long and as high as your waist!


BlueCello

6,225 posts

236 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Wouldn't like to meet that...anywhere really! yikes

But that's okay, because I also don;t posses to medium of time travel.

Chris71

21,549 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Aren't there claims that something this sort of size still lives in the Amazon somewhere?

Ok, yes, there are claims that fairies still live in certain places, but I seem to remember the giant Amazonian snake sightings are a bit more credible.

R4PID

1,060 posts

274 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
tidy

Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,580 posts

308 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Aren't there claims that something this sort of size still lives in the Amazon somewhere?

Ok, yes, there are claims that fairies still live in certain places, but I seem to remember the giant Amazonian snake sightings are a bit more credible.
There have been rumours of 35 foot (or longer) anacondas for sure. Lots of swamp and jungle out there....

pokethepope

2,667 posts

217 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Length of a bus and a metre high and it only weighs a tonne? suprising.

bimsb6

8,742 posts

250 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
ajstephe said:
As my girlfriend says, 'I've had bigger"

biggrin

fathomfive

11,215 posts

219 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:
40 plus feet long and as high as your waist!
Just break it's back with the bog brush and flush till it's gone.

HTH.

Jasandjules

72,560 posts

258 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
That's a shame, I thought for a minute there they'd actually found a new species roaming around somewhere.


paul26982

3,850 posts

247 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
think the stories of anaconda's is intresting, from the stories cant imagine there will be any left, as hunters will still be making a fortune

Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,580 posts

308 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
paul26982 said:
think the stories of anaconda's is intresting, from the stories cant imagine there will be any left, as hunters will still be making a fortune
Wiki said:
A specimen measured in 1944 exceeded this size when a petroleum expedition in Colombia claimed to have measured an anaconda which was 37.5 ft (11.4 m) in length, but this has never been proven.[5] Scientist Vincent Roth also claimed to have shot and killed a 10.3 metres (34 ft) specimen, but like most other claims, this has never been proven. Another claim of an extraordinarily large anaconda was made by adventurer Percy Fawcett. During his 1906 expedition, Fawcett wrote that he had shot an anaconda that measured some 62 feet (19 m) from nose to tail.[6] Once published, Fawcett’s account was widely ridiculed. Decades later, Belgian zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans came to Fawcett's defense, arguing that Fawcett's writing was generally honest and reliable.[7] Historian Mike Dash writes of claims of still larger anacondas, alleged to be as long as 30–45 m (100–150 ft)[8] — some of the sightings supported with photos (although those photos lack scale). Dash notes that if a 50–60 ft anaconda strains credulity, then a 150 ft long specimen is generally regarded as an outright impossibility.[8]There could be a few legendary giants out there but these would have to be extremely rare, possibly reaching lengths of over 45 to possibly 50 feet (15 m).[citation needed] it is also a highly disregarded myth that anacondas exist north of south america, for reports of giant 50 ft anacondas have been made in Honduras.

paul26982

3,850 posts

247 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:
paul26982 said:
think the stories of anaconda's is intresting, from the stories cant imagine there will be any left, as hunters will still be making a fortune
Wiki said:
A specimen measured in 1944 exceeded this size when a petroleum expedition in Colombia claimed to have measured an anaconda which was 37.5 ft (11.4 m) in length, but this has never been proven.[5] Scientist Vincent Roth also claimed to have shot and killed a 10.3 metres (34 ft) specimen, but like most other claims, this has never been proven. Another claim of an extraordinarily large anaconda was made by adventurer Percy Fawcett. During his 1906 expedition, Fawcett wrote that he had shot an anaconda that measured some 62 feet (19 m) from nose to tail.[6] Once published, Fawcett’s account was widely ridiculed. Decades later, Belgian zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans came to Fawcett's defense, arguing that Fawcett's writing was generally honest and reliable.[7] Historian Mike Dash writes of claims of still larger anacondas, alleged to be as long as 30–45 m (100–150 ft)[8] — some of the sightings supported with photos (although those photos lack scale). Dash notes that if a 50–60 ft anaconda strains credulity, then a 150 ft long specimen is generally regarded as an outright impossibility.[8]There could be a few legendary giants out there but these would have to be extremely rare, possibly reaching lengths of over 45 to possibly 50 feet (15 m).[citation needed] it is also a highly disregarded myth that anacondas exist north of south america, for reports of giant 50 ft anacondas have been made in Honduras.
thanks nice read read

Chris71

21,549 posts

271 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
[following the wiki article]

Jesus. A 150ft snake? eek

I believe there is a whole pseudo-science about such things called cryptozoology (or a spelling to that effect). Most curious are the reports of giant lizzards in Australia. It's a fascinating, if somewhat factually-dubious topic!

LukeBird

17,170 posts

238 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
eek
Wouldn't what to find that!

pits

6,704 posts

219 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all

LukeBird

17,170 posts

238 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
pits said:
what about this dead one found here
http://s40.photobucket.com/albums/e234/snakemantwo...
Every-fken-time! hehe
I knew it as well..

CedGTV

2,538 posts

283 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
pits said:
what about this dead one found here
http://s40.photobucket.com/albums/e234/snakemantwo...
Just had 4 rough tough builders all jumping back from the screen watching that.

RDMcG

20,832 posts

236 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Probably a good pet for the woman with the worlds largest breastssmile

pits

6,704 posts

219 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
CedGTV said:
pits said:
what about this dead one found here
http://s40.photobucket.com/albums/e234/snakemantwo...
Just had 4 rough tough builders all jumping back from the screen watching that.
The trick is to post it as a dead snake, makes people think its dead, then *BAM* scares teh st out of them

sstein

6,249 posts

283 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Why did the BBC feel the need to put

Warming world

in bold above the little blurb about temperatures. From the BBC article..

BBC said:
Assuming the Earth today was not particularly unusual, the researchers calculated that a snake of Titanoboa's size would have required an average annual temperature of 30C to 34C (86F to 93F) to survive.
The article then goes on to say

BBC said:
By comparison, the average yearly temperature of today's Cartagena, a Colombian coastal city, is about 28C.
So, not a warming world at all then...

-

Stuart