danny dyer's deadliest men
danny dyer's deadliest men
Author
Discussion

ukwill

Original Poster:

10,129 posts

236 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
What a cocktard of the highest order. Mockney tt seems to idolise armed gunmen, robbers and geneally anyone who is a "bit tasty".

Innit. Geeza. Safe.

ytrebil

792 posts

215 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
ukwill said:
What a cocktard of the highest order. Mockney tt seems to idolise armed gunmen, robbers and geneally anyone who is a "bit tasty".

Innit. Geeza. Safe.
To be fair he does it for the $$$ rather than for your love!!!!!!!

sstein

6,249 posts

283 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
ukwill said:
What a cocktard of the highest order. Mockney tt seems to idolise armed gunmen, robbers and geneally anyone who is a "bit tasty".

Innit. Geeza. Safe.
Danny Dyer

rofl

You have summed him up pretty well I reckon.

-


Stuart

OllieWinchester

5,700 posts

221 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Can't link as its blocked at work, but there is some cracking parodies of him on youtube.

Nobody You Know

8,422 posts

222 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Deadliest Men?

I bet it did not feature any or all of the following:

Joseph Stalin
Adolph Hitler
Pol Pot
Osama Bin Laden
Sadam Hussain
Idi Amin
Kim Jong Il
Vlad the Impaler

If it didn't the programme was a load of lies.


Antony Moxey

10,674 posts

248 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Danny Dyer? Danny Dire surely?

OllieWinchester

5,700 posts

221 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Antony Moxey said:
Danny Dyer? Danny Dire surely?
Yeah, thats the name the guy who does the parodies on youtube goes under.

elster

17,517 posts

239 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Surely he does whatever pays the bills and for the show whatever the producer wants. The public want to see as well.

I have seen his stage acting, I think he is a good actor.


central

16,745 posts

246 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all

thehawk

9,335 posts

236 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Nobody You Know said:
Deadliest Men?

I bet it did not feature any or all of the following:

Joseph Stalin
Adolph Hitler
Pol Pot
Osama Bin Laden
Sadam Hussain
Idi Amin
Kim Jong Il
Vlad the Impaler
George Bush
Tony Blair

If it didn't the programme was a load of lies.
EFA

Trooper2

6,676 posts

260 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
thehawk said:
Nobody You Know said:
Deadliest Men?

I bet it did not feature any or all of the following:

Joseph Stalin
Adolph Hitler
Pol Pot
Osama Bin Laden
Sadam Hussain
Idi Amin
Kim Jong Il
Vlad the Impaler
George Bush
Tony Blair

If it didn't the programme was a load of lies.
EFA
Where do Slobodan Milosevic and Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic fit into your deadliest men scheme, Internet genius?

....and where was the Mujahideen? Guess they decided not to show up for that blood bath!


No mention of the African warlords other than Amin?.....Shame.

ukwill

Original Poster:

10,129 posts

236 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
elster said:
Surely he does whatever pays the bills and for the show whatever the producer wants. The public want to see as well.

I have seen his stage acting, I think he is a good actor.
But the programme doesnt require for him to act. So either he's acting as some wide-boy cockney bellend infatuated by the villains he interviews, or he actually is one.

If he were a good actor wouldn't he get a range of parts? Everything I have ever seen in him, he "plays" the same part.

okgo

42,072 posts

227 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
ukwill said:
elster said:
Surely he does whatever pays the bills and for the show whatever the producer wants. The public want to see as well.

I have seen his stage acting, I think he is a good actor.
But the programme doesnt require for him to act. So either he's acting as some wide-boy cockney bellend infatuated by the villains he interviews, or he actually is one.

If he were a good actor wouldn't he get a range of parts? Everything I have ever seen in him, he "plays" the same part.
He is good at playing himself, much like Hugh grant.

On said program he is not really acting, he is just like that from what I have seen. He is exactly the same on Human Traffic but ten years younger.

Chris_w666

22,655 posts

228 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
okgo said:
ukwill said:
elster said:
Surely he does whatever pays the bills and for the show whatever the producer wants. The public want to see as well.

I have seen his stage acting, I think he is a good actor.
But the programme doesnt require for him to act. So either he's acting as some wide-boy cockney bellend infatuated by the villains he interviews, or he actually is one.

If he were a good actor wouldn't he get a range of parts? Everything I have ever seen in him, he "plays" the same part.
He is good at playing himself, much like Hugh grant.

On said program he is not really acting, he is just like that from what I have seen. He is exactly the same on Human Traffic but ten years younger.
He seems to do what is asked of him, if Documentary producers want that character then why not?

I would rather Danny Dyer present real football factories than some limp wristed drama student scared of his own shadow and unable to look at scary people.

chunkymonkey71

13,167 posts

227 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Nobody You Know said:
Deadliest Men?

I bet it did not feature any or all of the following:

Joseph Stalin
Adolph Hitler
Pol Pot
Osama Bin Laden
Sadam Hussain
Idi Amin
Kim Jong Il
Vlad the Impaler

If it didn't the programme was a load of lies.
What about the designers of the Dodge Viper? Lets stick a big truck engine in a car that doesnt really handle...

thats pretty deadly...!

Edited by chunkymonkey71 on Friday 6th February 11:12

hornetrider

63,161 posts

234 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
I liked Human Traffic - top movie

okgo

42,072 posts

227 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Chris_w666 said:
okgo said:
ukwill said:
elster said:
Surely he does whatever pays the bills and for the show whatever the producer wants. The public want to see as well.

I have seen his stage acting, I think he is a good actor.
But the programme doesnt require for him to act. So either he's acting as some wide-boy cockney bellend infatuated by the villains he interviews, or he actually is one.

If he were a good actor wouldn't he get a range of parts? Everything I have ever seen in him, he "plays" the same part.
He is good at playing himself, much like Hugh grant.

On said program he is not really acting, he is just like that from what I have seen. He is exactly the same on Human Traffic but ten years younger.
He seems to do what is asked of him, if Documentary producers want that character then why not?

I would rather Danny Dyer present real football factories than some limp wristed drama student scared of his own shadow and unable to look at scary people.
There are not that many famous faces that would fit in with some of these people the way he seems to.

The rhyming slang is very funny though, although I suppose coming from Canning Town its normal.

ukwill

Original Poster:

10,129 posts

236 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Chris_w666 said:
okgo said:
ukwill said:
elster said:
Surely he does whatever pays the bills and for the show whatever the producer wants. The public want to see as well.

I have seen his stage acting, I think he is a good actor.
But the programme doesnt require for him to act. So either he's acting as some wide-boy cockney bellend infatuated by the villains he interviews, or he actually is one.

If he were a good actor wouldn't he get a range of parts? Everything I have ever seen in him, he "plays" the same part.
He is good at playing himself, much like Hugh grant.

On said program he is not really acting, he is just like that from what I have seen. He is exactly the same on Human Traffic but ten years younger.
He seems to do what is asked of him, if Documentary producers want that character then why not?

I would rather Danny Dyer present real football factories than some limp wristed drama student scared of his own shadow and unable to look at scary people.
You think the presenter needs to be as pikey as the people they are interviewing? Personally I dont even see the point of the program. I couldn't care less about the life of some thug armed robber from Lahndan or anywhere else. Alas, it would seem that Sky is obsessed with this kind of programming. Probably a sign of our culture.

okgo

42,072 posts

227 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
ukwill said:
Chris_w666 said:
okgo said:
ukwill said:
elster said:
Surely he does whatever pays the bills and for the show whatever the producer wants. The public want to see as well.

I have seen his stage acting, I think he is a good actor.
But the programme doesnt require for him to act. So either he's acting as some wide-boy cockney bellend infatuated by the villains he interviews, or he actually is one.

If he were a good actor wouldn't he get a range of parts? Everything I have ever seen in him, he "plays" the same part.
He is good at playing himself, much like Hugh grant.

On said program he is not really acting, he is just like that from what I have seen. He is exactly the same on Human Traffic but ten years younger.
He seems to do what is asked of him, if Documentary producers want that character then why not?

I would rather Danny Dyer present real football factories than some limp wristed drama student scared of his own shadow and unable to look at scary people.
You think the presenter needs to be as pikey as the people they are interviewing? Personally I dont even see the point of the program. I couldn't care less about the life of some thug armed robber from Lahndan or anywhere else. Alas, it would seem that Sky is obsessed with this kind of programming. Probably a sign of our culture.
If everyone liked the same things it would be a boring place to be.

ukwill

Original Poster:

10,129 posts

236 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
okgo said:
ukwill said:
Chris_w666 said:
okgo said:
ukwill said:
elster said:
Surely he does whatever pays the bills and for the show whatever the producer wants. The public want to see as well.

I have seen his stage acting, I think he is a good actor.
But the programme doesnt require for him to act. So either he's acting as some wide-boy cockney bellend infatuated by the villains he interviews, or he actually is one.

If he were a good actor wouldn't he get a range of parts? Everything I have ever seen in him, he "plays" the same part.
He is good at playing himself, much like Hugh grant.

On said program he is not really acting, he is just like that from what I have seen. He is exactly the same on Human Traffic but ten years younger.
He seems to do what is asked of him, if Documentary producers want that character then why not?

I would rather Danny Dyer present real football factories than some limp wristed drama student scared of his own shadow and unable to look at scary people.
You think the presenter needs to be as pikey as the people they are interviewing? Personally I dont even see the point of the program. I couldn't care less about the life of some thug armed robber from Lahndan or anywhere else. Alas, it would seem that Sky is obsessed with this kind of programming. Probably a sign of our culture.
If everyone liked the same things it would be a boring place to be.
You are Non-Sequitur man AICMFP