Can you imagine the conversation?
Can you imagine the conversation?
Author
Discussion

MaxAndRuby

Original Poster:

6,792 posts

255 months

Thursday 26th February 2009
quotequote all
Alistair Darling - "Hello Sir Fred. Listen, we've overlooked a small issue when we bought 70% of RBS with taxpayers money. We forget to check your pension allowance, and now I'm looking an absolute twunt in front of the whole nation. I know there's no legal reason why you should give up £650K per annum for the rest of your life, but it really, really would help my political career. Also, in this climate it really is morally incorrect for you too take such remuneration from a publically controlled company. The ball's in your court Fred, will you surrender the pension?"

Sir Fred - "No. HTH."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7912651.stm

Edited by MaxAndRuby on Thursday 26th February 16:03

dibbers006

14,625 posts

241 months

Thursday 26th February 2009
quotequote all
'Please Mistaa, can we have our ball back...'

stormin

1,304 posts

234 months

Thursday 26th February 2009
quotequote all
70% taxpayers money, 30% RBS - 70% of his pension back to the taxpayer, 30% to him.

Pesty

42,655 posts

279 months

Thursday 26th February 2009
quotequote all
"Chancellor Alistair Darling has admitted the government could have stopped ex-RBS chief Sir Fred Goodwin from getting a £650,000-a-year pension.

But it did not realise this at the time when it agreed to pump £20bn of taxpayers money into the firm."

Choosing not to for good reasons or not being able to fine.

Not understanding what the fk you were doing?

Bunch of cocks

mechsympathy

57,365 posts

278 months

Thursday 26th February 2009
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Not understanding what the fk you were doing?

Bunch of cocks
And just like other financial cock ups they've made they're trying to spin their way out of accepting blamerolleyes

siscar

6,887 posts

240 months

Thursday 26th February 2009
quotequote all
Pesty said:
"Chancellor Alistair Darling has admitted the government could have stopped ex-RBS chief Sir Fred Goodwin from getting a £650,000-a-year pension.

But it did not realise this at the time when it agreed to pump £20bn of taxpayers money into the firm."

Choosing not to for good reasons or not being able to fine.

Not understanding what the fk you were doing?

Bunch of cocks
The only reason he will have got this pension is because it's in his contract. As such nobody could have stopped him getting it. Sure the government could have said that they were only willing to put money in if he gave it up but if he'd said no they would have been stuffed. Would they have let RBS fold just because he wouldn't give up his pension?

Sciroccology

29,908 posts

253 months

Thursday 26th February 2009
quotequote all
"Er Fred, you know that mahoosive pension that the RBS board voted that you could have, like ages ago, before everything went tits-up and we had to bail you out? Well, I was just wondering if you wouldn't mind giving some of it back..."

drivin_me_nuts

17,949 posts

234 months

Thursday 26th February 2009
quotequote all
canny businessman wrt feathering his own nest. I think this one has a lot of running in it yet. Govt must be desperately seeking the services of Mr Spin to somhow wrangle their way out of guilt by association.


bitwrx

1,352 posts

227 months

Thursday 26th February 2009
quotequote all
Surely they should've kept him on until the results were posted the other day, then sacked him for being the boss when things went tits up.