Optimax, yes or no?
Discussion
Well, the debate will rage eternally on this
Placebo effect, absolute bolox, scientific fact, mechanical impossibility will all be strongly voiced and believed in equal amounts
Personally, I have a new Elise 111R and use Ultimate / Optimax / Excelleum everytime... not that I believe any performance gain, but there is a strong view on an extra economy return justfying the extra cost per litre. I buy into that... and also, only the best for my new baby!
Placebo effect, absolute bolox, scientific fact, mechanical impossibility will all be strongly voiced and believed in equal amounts
Personally, I have a new Elise 111R and use Ultimate / Optimax / Excelleum everytime... not that I believe any performance gain, but there is a strong view on an extra economy return justfying the extra cost per litre. I buy into that... and also, only the best for my new baby!
My BMW Z3 M coupe S54( E46 M3 engine) loves it too
it does more miles the gallon and feels a bit more responsive
also a bit more expensive but still cheaper at the end of the year because of the more miles the gallon! and with tango no seals but shell does, so I save those and at the end of the year I let pay them out for cash so cheaper again
GTRene
it does more miles the gallon and feels a bit more responsive
also a bit more expensive but still cheaper at the end of the year because of the more miles the gallon! and with tango no seals but shell does, so I save those and at the end of the year I let pay them out for cash so cheaper again
GTRene
Run My S2 Sport 190 on Optimax, fifth gear run a test a few months back
http://fifthgear.five.tv/jsp/5gmain.j
http://fifthgear.five.tv/jsp/5gmain.j
Dave Walker (not me the other one) said last month in Circuit Driver that he can tell the difference with K-series engine when they run different fuels.
He said he thought Optimax was the best (for power) over Ultima from his experience.
However, not sure how that applies to a VHPD engine.
He said he thought Optimax was the best (for power) over Ultima from his experience.
However, not sure how that applies to a VHPD engine.
jitsukadave said:
Dave Walker (not me the other one) said last month in Circuit Driver that he can tell the difference with K-series engine when they run different fuels.
He said he thought Optimax was the best (for power) over Ultima from his experience.
However, not sure how that applies to a VHPD engine.
Interesting. Dave Walker's the man for K series engines.
RobM77 said:
jitsukadave said:
Dave Walker (not me the other one) said last month in Circuit Driver that he can tell the difference with K-series engine when they run different fuels.
He said he thought Optimax was the best (for power) over Ultima from his experience.
However, not sure how that applies to a VHPD engine.
Interesting. Dave Walker's the man for K series engines.
True, and having just looked up the CD article, he does say that the K Series seems to work better with Optimax. However I assume he's talking about when he's mapping an Emerald ECU (since that's what he does) rather than on a standard ECU. I would have thought (but am happy to be proved wrong) that a standard ECU, even on a VHPD will be set with it's timing suitable for the lowest common denominator, 95 octane.
However (and here's where I start to get confused), he mentions MBT, Minimum Best Timing, advancing the timing only as far as you need to to get the best power, not as far as possible which is the reason I was always told that higher octane fuels gave better power, the timing could be advanced right up to the point of detonation and power would increase proportionaltely.
So, an engine, to advance timing appropriate to the fuel would need a knock sensor, which the K doesn't have.
What DW seems to be saying however is that MBT will most likely not be possible with 95 octane in a K series (assuming again he's talking about mapping his own ECU) but that Optimax makes it possible.
So, the question still remains, assuming a standard ECU, what did the engineers map for in a VHPD engine? It's unlikely they could have mapped for MBT with 95, so did they assume 98?
I need a lie down.
My current car shows no change between 95, 97 and 99 RON fuels (slightly off topic as it's not a K-series). The owners club say not to use 95 too much as it's on the edge of the ECU range as it's a Japanese domestic market car, and programmed for 95-108 RON fuel. Still, it's not concked out yet (touch wood).
My parents also had a Seirra with a de-tuned Cosworth engine in it about the time everytihng went to unleaded (1992-1994?). They were told to never put super in; if normal unleaded wasn't available stick 4 star leaded in instead. Not sure how much myth is in that though.
My parents also had a Seirra with a de-tuned Cosworth engine in it about the time everytihng went to unleaded (1992-1994?). They were told to never put super in; if normal unleaded wasn't available stick 4 star leaded in instead. Not sure how much myth is in that though.
Gassing Station | Elise/Exige/Europa/340R | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




