Anyone for venison?
Author
Discussion

Gruffy

Original Poster:

7,212 posts

290 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
I'm angry.

23:00 at night, a country lane, driving my Elise. A deer hears the Elise coming and decides the best course of action would be to wait for a bit and then leap out from the bushes at the last minute and play chicken.

Sadly, I've seen people with no arms or legs or eyes play chicken better. I swerved, thought I might make it but the little bastard kept on sprinting like bloody Bambi on speed and clipped my offside wing.

I say clipped, but then a deer isn't a small animal and the bugger nutted right through the clamshell and bled all over it. It flew into the air (7.8 for artistic merit, but the landing was poor... 5.4) and slid down the road for a bit, coming to a stop alongside the Elise. By the time I was out of the car and asking for it's insurance details it was up and scarpering like a bloody coward.

Looks like I need a new clam, which isn't going to be cheap. Anyway, the moral of the story... protect yourselves, eat venison.

Janitor

2,372 posts

250 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Not quite as emotional as Gooby's legendary encounter, but very graphic Gruff!

Unlucky mate... will it polish out?

Ouch... nah, thought not

Hope it gets sorted without drama

Trixster

252 posts

249 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Elise + Deer = headache. Bad luck mate, make sure you post up some picks when you get her back looking all shiny!

stu hill

147 posts

247 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Sorry to hear that Darren. It's probably worse for Bambi.

At least you don't have to take the Peu on the Furball. And it'll be stone chip free for you return.

gooby

9,269 posts

265 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Wow - you havent had a good night. I trust insurance will take care of the uncomfortable bill.

It seems a lot of PH ers are developing deer fear.

It does develop an interesting point. With the UK's current nambyism over such things as sensible culling of deer, thier numbers are spiraling out of control. I know that locally the National Trust own most of the purbecks and they will not allow a cull to take place. There are less and less people with stalkers licences so how are we going to "eat venison" unless very high calibre weapons are used (cars)! It will end badly. Be careful out there - please.

Edited by gooby on Tuesday 20th June 09:02

wacattack

576 posts

256 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
I know its wrong to laugh at what happened but the way you wrote that was hilarious!

Sorry to hear about your car mate

And very sorry for the deer

shangani

3,069 posts

268 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Bolocs barbecue?

Gruffy

Original Poster:

7,212 posts

290 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
gooby said:
Wow - you havent had a good night. I trust insurance will take care of the uncomfortable bill.

Tricky one. I'm currently at 3.5yrs NCB (ie unprotected) and I'm not sure what would be more expensive, paying for a new clam or paying through the nose for insurance forever?

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

281 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
One thing I didn't know until recently, Gruffy, is that when you make a claim you don't actually go back to 0 no claims. dependent upon the severity they 'take off' 1 or 2 yrs no claims bonus, so you won't actually go back to scratch but you will still feel a hit for a few years.

Anyhow, sorry to hear it happened but at least you're ok!

Gruffy

Original Poster:

7,212 posts

290 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Sound like a phone call to the insurers then. Though I'm guessing a £2.5k claim for a new clam isn't likely to be taken lightly.

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

281 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
You don't get in trouble for discussing it with them, if you see what I mean; you are more than allowed to say I've had an accident but don't know whether to claim or not.

£2.5k sounds a lot but on £1000/yr insurance it will turn it to £500+ more per year for 3 or 4 years (all very big estimates!), so I'm sure it will come down to cash flow more than anything.

Fingers crossed for you pal!

molydood

103 posts

258 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Careful! A mate of mine dicussed an incident with his insurers (elephant) and decided not to claim in the end. They sent him a bill for an increased premium even though it was somebody else that hit him AND he didnt claim!

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

281 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
ooo feck; that's interesting!

Janitor

2,372 posts

250 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
ooo feck; that's interesting!

That's not interesting Tony - it's sodding disgraceful!

cej

961 posts

253 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
indeed. I hope he's not a customer there anymore

Geez. those insurance companies will come up with anything to get your money and avoid paying you when it's really needed

molydood

103 posts

258 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
in their view the incident still happened which means a higher risk driver.

no he will not use elephant out of principle now, even though they were cheaper than competition

beachbum

2,610 posts

262 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
You dont have to make a claim. You are legally obliged to declare all accidents to your insurance company even if it was not your fault, or whether you make a claim or not. Failing to do so, can result in them revoking your insurance if they find out, which isnt usually until you dfo actually make a claim.

And yes they do then push up your premium. Some perverse logic says that even if you are involved in an accident that was not your fault, it means that you are then more likely to have an accident that was your fault, therefore you are a greater liability so your premium increases.

Gruffy

Original Poster:

7,212 posts

290 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
beachbum said:
Some perverse logic says that even if you are involved in an accident that was not your fault, it means that you are then more likely to have an accident that was your fault, therefore you are a greater liability so your premium increases.

Don't I know it! When I was 17 I was rear-ended waiting at a junction and then 10 days later a 4x4 ran a red light and put me in hospital for a few days. Clearly, I was free from blame in both incidents but that didn't stop the insurance companies from rear-ending me for the next few years.

It's soul-destroying at times like this where I should be making use of my insurance but it would only cost me more in the long run.

rrb

6 posts

245 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
Its an absolute pi55er but its all in the maths.

Allegedly all these companies do is run algorithms based on previous crashes.

Not sure if your frequent rear-ending proves this out or not gruffy.

Gruffy

Original Poster:

7,212 posts

290 months

Tuesday 20th June 2006
quotequote all
I understand that it's all about the data. I'm sure it must be the case that, for whatever reason, those who've been involved in non-fault accidents are (as a group) more likely to be involved in other accidents. After my two non-fault accidents though I've had 10 years clean driving until Bambi leapt out last night.