renault spider
Author
Discussion

crackthatoff

Original Poster:

3,314 posts

244 months

Friday 30th November 2007
quotequote all
why did these never take off like the elise?, they look pretty cool with the lambo doors ! http://pistonheads.com/sales/272613.htm 

riwiho

3,805 posts

246 months

Friday 30th November 2007
quotequote all
crackthatoff said:
why did these never take off like the elise?, they look pretty cool with the lambo doors ! http://pistonheads.com/sales/272613.htm 
Have to agree with you. I think the styling looks the business.

What year were these first produced as there is a certain look of S1 about them or there is a certain Renault Spider look about the S1 depending on the year of manufacture

miro

419 posts

231 months

Friday 30th November 2007
quotequote all
I believe that they are heavy. Therefore slow and with poor handling compared to the elise. most people by an elise because the way they drive. The looks are a bonus biggrin

smartie

2,630 posts

304 months

Friday 30th November 2007
quotequote all
no weather gear didn't help!

Heebeegeetee

30,254 posts

279 months

Friday 30th November 2007
quotequote all
Yep, heavy, no roof and expensive. Apart from that they were fine.

alvington89

212 posts

253 months

Friday 30th November 2007
quotequote all
The main reason it didn't do too well (apart from it being French) is that the 340R came out at the same time which was lighter, more powerful and better in every respect. The Renault is a bit of a barge in comparrison.

Gad-Westy

16,646 posts

244 months

Friday 30th November 2007
quotequote all
alvington89 said:
The main reason it didn't do too well (apart from it being French) is that the 340R came out at the same time which was lighter, more powerful and better in every respect. The Renault is a bit of a barge in comparrison.
The Spider came out at the same time as the original S1 Elise. Unfortunately for Renault, the Elise did more or less everything better (also applies to the Caterham 21) and so it was a sales flop. Consequently they're very rare and nowadays, still worth a pretty penny and they do look stunning.

Tuna

19,930 posts

315 months

Friday 30th November 2007
quotequote all
Yep, same time as the original Elise, if not slightly before.

If I remember rightly, it was the 'other' car that made the breakthrough of using an aluminium chassis - except it's chassis was welded where the Elise's was glued. The original cars made no concession to being road cars - a little airfoil rather than a proper windscreen meant the driver had to wear a helmet. That made it seem rather niche like the Ariel Atom, except the alu chassis made it very expensive. At the same time I can't remember anyone getting very excited about the handling.

S Works

10,166 posts

281 months

Friday 30th November 2007
quotequote all
Big fat underpowered shed.

ptp170

277 posts

238 months

Saturday 1st December 2007
quotequote all
Drove one back in 2000. Had been out in an S1 Elise the previous month so was expecting good things. Looked the dogs bollox, but unfortunately the weight killed the acceleration. The nearest thing I could compare it to at the time acceleration wise was the 2.0 16v Astra GTE (fun!). Cornered well too, but was just way too heavy for the Williams engine that powered it frown

Gad-Westy

16,646 posts

244 months

Saturday 1st December 2007
quotequote all
S Works said:
Big fat underpowered shed.
Thats a little harsh, not least because it had a more powerful (and better) engine than the original S1. It wasn't a bad car, it just arrived at completely the wrong time. It was exactly the same reason the Caterham 21 failed. Good car, but the competition was doing it better with less compromise and cheaper.

S2Dave

37 posts

245 months

Saturday 1st December 2007
quotequote all
S Works said:
Big fat underpowered shed.
clap