DVA liners Question?
Author
Discussion

Russ H

Original Poster:

252 posts

231 months

Thursday 8th October 2009
quotequote all
Anyone had their head reworked and NOT neaded the liners reset?

On my 6k k Series what would I expect or doesn't mileage matter?

Russ.

Esprit

6,373 posts

306 months

Thursday 8th October 2009
quotequote all
My liners were all ok after 23k miles from a height point of view. I had to replace them because they'd ovaled (VHPD).

LRGS2

143 posts

241 months

Thursday 8th October 2009
quotequote all
My liners have been low since manufacture and gave problems with multiple head gasket failures! DVA recommend 4-5 though clearance above block face. DVA also has special longer liners if your current liners are less than this recommendation. Liner height should not change with engine age unless you have a soft cast block? Liner heights should be consistent over all four. Hope this helps!

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

250 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Yep - lots of them came out of the factory at the wrong height(s). Depending on what they are, Dave can linish the block, fit new liners or if they're very slightly under, use an elastomer gasket to make up the difference.

bogie

16,896 posts

295 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
the variability in manufacture is one of the points to address on the K series ...and what DVA does as routine business wink

...at least you havnt got a porous head or such like too frown

JTBUSH

625 posts

231 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
bogie said:
the variability in manufacture is one of the points to address on the K series ...and what DVA does as routine business wink

...at least you havnt got a porous head or such like too frown
Think Id prefer a porous head.

bogie

16,896 posts

295 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
JTBUSH said:
bogie said:
the variability in manufacture is one of the points to address on the K series ...and what DVA does as routine business wink

...at least you havnt got a porous head or such like too frown
Think Id prefer a porous head.
yes, less hassle to sort than height issues LOL wink

JTBUSH

625 posts

231 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Someone shouldve properly screwed Rover for the low liner issue.

Edited by JTBUSH on Friday 9th October 14:45

Russ H

Original Poster:

252 posts

231 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
So it seems likely that any head work will usualy need the liners sorting.

Now what engines were common for having aero heads? Just the standard ones,
VVC or both and what years of manufacture?

Russ. smile

JTBUSH

625 posts

231 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Not 100% on this but think there may have been a particularly bad period re liners.

bogie

16,896 posts

295 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Russ H said:
So it seems likely that any head work will usualy need the liners sorting.

Now what engines were common for having aero heads? Just the standard ones,
VVC or both and what years of manufacture?

Russ. smile
I think its like a TVR speed 6 style lottery LOL ...although the S2 135rs had a high percentage of failure considering the numbers produced....

TIPPER

2,955 posts

242 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
My understaing is that things worsened on newer cars (casting quality went down as Rover neared its demise).
As bogie says, there also seemed to be a problem with the batch of heads used in the 135R.

RonnieP

1,153 posts

250 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Sinkage, heat/cool aluminium and its properties diminish/change and the old iron liners gradually sink into it and surprise, surprise, tolerances change. Shame that a bit of basic O level chemistry eluded the chaps at Longbridge.