Looking for an Elise 111s? You may want to read this ..story
Looking for an Elise 111s? You may want to read this ..story
Author
Discussion

MattW

Original Poster:

1,076 posts

307 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
Then let me tell you a story.

I owned a lovely silver 111s with a nice new red leather interior, and sprayed silver doors pods with all the alloy bits added from door pod screws through to handbrake cover; which I thought set the car off really well. The only thing that bugged me about the car was that somewhere along the line the carbon fibre dash inserts had gone missing and had been replaced with standard ones.

Ah well not to worry I thought, I'll just find some new ones and replace them.......until one fateful day on my drive home from work.

I had just glanced down at my speedo having come to a complete stop on the motorway in some traffic and noted that the milage now said 11k and smiled to myself thinking of the hassle I had gone through getting hold of a letter of verification on my speedo head change from Bell & Collvile; the milage was actually closer to 38k you see.

And then WHAM!!! Some sod drove into the back of me, next thing I knew I was on the hard should and my beloved car was in bits!



I took all my pics of the car to well known (South Coast) Lotus specialist, as I did not want the car repaired by some dodgy insurance company repairer; he took one look at the pics and stated that the car should never be repaired in his opinion as it would never run true again; unless of course it had a new chassis / tub fitted. Ultimatly the car was written off by the insurance company and I never saw it again......or maybe I did.

So I removed the private plate and the car reverted back to its old reg number of V710 JTF.

So there you have it, a nice little bit of history, should you be looking for Silver 111s.

Matt


Phil. S.

180 posts

253 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
I assume you are referring to this ad http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1414470.htm (nowt to do with me btw). I am no expert, but from the pic you posted above, it does not look like it needs a new chassis. Just a rear clam and perhaps and wishbones on osr. Perhaps the engineer meant it would need a new subframe rather than chassis?

Edited by Phil. S. on Wednesday 6th January 14:30

Scuffers

20,887 posts

297 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
repair looks sensible enough, it certainly did not require a re-tub...

Only dodgy bit the the mileage, and to be fair the the seller, how would he know it's not kosher?

that said, too much money I think, I would suggest more like £7,000

MattW

Original Poster:

1,076 posts

307 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
Phil. S. said:
I assume you are referring to this ad http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1414470.htm (nowt to do with me btw). I am no expert, but from the pic you posted above, it does not look like it needs a new chassis. Just a rear clam and perhaps and wishbones on osr. Perhaps the engineer meant it would need a new subframe rather than chassis?

Edited by Phil. S. on Wednesday 6th January 14:30
Just telling you you what someone who works on these cars day in and day out told me. I am no expert so would not have an opinion either way. Odd though that the seller makes no mention of this damage and suggests it was written off due to cosmectic fibre glass damage don't you think?

Edited by MattW on Wednesday 6th January 15:40

s111dpc

1,485 posts

252 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
What's odd to me is the damage in the OPs photo differs from the damage in the sellers photo. Thus I assume that the OPs damage led to the Cat 'D' and then the current owner pranged it requiring additional clam work confused

Incredible Sulk

5,427 posts

218 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
Phil. S. said:
I assume you are referring to this ad http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1414470.htm (nowt to do with me btw). I am no expert, but from the pic you posted above, it does not look like it needs a new chassis. Just a rear clam and perhaps and wishbones on osr. Perhaps the engineer meant it would need a new subframe rather than chassis?

Edited by Phil. S. on Wednesday 6th January 14:30
I might have changed the wheel as well.............whistle

doggydave

329 posts

198 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
MattW said:
Then let me tell you a story.

I owned a lovely silver 111s with a nice new red leather interior, and sprayed silver doors pods with all the alloy bits added from door pod screws through to handbrake cover; which I thought set the car off really well. The only thing that bugged me about the car was that somewhere along the line the carbon fibre dash inserts had gone missing and had been replaced with standard ones.

Ah well not to worry I thought, I'll just find some new ones and replace them.......until one fateful day on my drive home from work.

I had just glanced down at my speedo having come to a complete stop on the motorway in some traffic and noted that the milage now said 11k and smiled to myself thinking of the hassle I had gone through getting hold of a letter of verification on my speedo head change from Bell & Collvile; the milage was actually closer to 38k you see.

And then WHAM!!! Some sod drove into the back of me, next thing I knew I was on the hard should and my beloved car was in bits!



I took all my pics of the car to well known (South Coast) Lotus specialist, as I did not want the car repaired by some dodgy insurance company repairer; he took one look at the pics and stated that the car should never be repaired in his opinion as it would never run true again; unless of course it had a new chassis / tub fitted. Ultimatly the car was written off by the insurance company and I never saw it again......or maybe I did.

So I removed the private plate and the car reverted back to its old reg number of V710 JTF.

So there you have it, a nice little bit of history, should you be looking for Silver 111s.

Matt
Good for you Matt. I would have done the same in your position. Dave.

Fidgits

17,202 posts

252 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
definatley good to post that up, especially regarding the mileage issue wink

NDT

1,766 posts

286 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
s111dpc said:
What's odd to me is the damage in the OPs photo differs from the damage in the sellers photo. Thus I assume that the OPs damage led to the Cat 'D' and then the current owner pranged it requiring additional clam work confused
so the ad is either:
a) showing a different crashed car
b) for a car that has been ringed
b) the same car crashed a second time

Scuffers

20,887 posts

297 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
different accident damage, one on the add has been 'posted'


randy

544 posts

299 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
From that pic it looks like the damage is contained to the clam and rear subframe. I can see why it would be written off but I can also see how it could be happily repaired.

bordseye

2,219 posts

215 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
When you negotiated the claim with the insurance company, did you tell them that the mileage was incorrect thus affecting the value of the car?

MattW

Original Poster:

1,076 posts

307 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
bordseye said:
When you negotiated the claim with the insurance company, did you tell them that the mileage was incorrect thus affecting the value of the car?
They had all the info; as per usual I had to give every shred of info to fight for every penny.

S Works

10,166 posts

273 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
Bit of a naughty advert really, isn't it? Why not report it if you know it's misrepresented?

GLOL at the ad anyway - it's a 111S with that well known 135bhp VVC engine you know, quite a rarity so I hear rofl

Phil. S.

180 posts

253 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
MattW said:
Phil. S. said:
I assume you are referring to this ad http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1414470.htm (nowt to do with me btw). I am no expert, but from the pic you posted above, it does not look like it needs a new chassis. Just a rear clam and perhaps and wishbones on osr. Perhaps the engineer meant it would need a new subframe rather than chassis?

Edited by Phil. S. on Wednesday 6th January 14:30
Just telling you you what someone who works on these cars day in and day out told me. I am no expert so would not have an opinion either way. Odd though that the seller makes no mention of this damage and suggests it was written off due to cosmectic fibre glass damage don't you think?

Edited by MattW on Wednesday 6th January 15:40
Sorry, i didn't mean to appear to be criticising you. I was just surprised that you were told that it would require a new tub from what I could see of the picture. I am not, however, surpised it was written off. It is very easy to write off an S1. Mine was nearly written off with a relatively minor rear shunt at a roundabout. It cracked the rear clam, and bent the exhaust. But the first quote I got for the repair was close to £5k inc vat, and that is enough to write the car off, even though it only needed a new exhaust and Clam.

p4ilip

9 posts

194 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
Hi, This is my car!

I was not aware it had been damaged before and bought it in september from Admiral Insurance with the damage as shown in my add.

I have just done an hpi check to see if i could find out a bit more so i could update my add, The car has had 5 owners now and your not recorded as the previous owner on my v5 so it would suggest that your insurance company decided that the car could be repaired again and sold it on to someone who had it fixed then went and had a smaller accident,then i bought it.

I advertised the car as having low miles as that is what the speedo states and the car is very clean so i had no reason to doubt it, i did not realise that you had changed the speedo and was given no service history from the insurance company

If you have any documents or any more pictures please could you let me have a copy of them as i would like to build up a history of the car. A copy of that mileage certificate could be handy as it sounds like you had a job getting it.

I would appreciate it if you could email me via my add or give me a call if possible.

Thanks in advance, Phil.

jke11y

3,194 posts

260 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
OOooft, double-CatD, now with pics of the first round of damage... Good luck punting that !

cyberface

12,214 posts

280 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
At least everything will be out in the open for buyers to make up their own mind... yes it's been in a few stacks but honesty is a better policy IMO. It's not as if these cars can't be repaired to as-new standard (especially when the damage is to the bodywork - I'd rather have an Elise with a replacement clam than a steel / aluminium car with beaten out / filled and repainted panels...

TIPPER

2,955 posts

242 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
DAFL cyberface.
Buyers (and some owners) need to get their heads around the consumable nature of Elise clams, subframes, etc.

junks

303 posts

263 months

Thursday 7th January 2010
quotequote all
That looks bloody good value to me - the damage shown above would cause the Insurance companies to bulk a bit but its easily repaired as Chris has said earlier. If it only has one instance of being written off recorded at HPI against it then its only been written off once! There are plenty of Elises on the road which have had similar or far worse damage & not recorded so why should this car be any different?

I didn't see the previous ad so don't know what was said but the ad seems honest now anyway & a good price yes

Saying the car would never run true from that damage is absolute rubbish - ask Randy if his Europa runs true after the damage at brands!

Edited by junks on Thursday 7th January 09:28