If overtaking and the car infront turns right?
If overtaking and the car infront turns right?
Author
Discussion

S. Gonzales Esq.

2,559 posts

232 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
The chances of this kind of thing happening are minimised if you make sure the 'target' vehicle is aware of your presence.

GreenV8S

30,993 posts

304 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
EP2Nick said:
who would be at fault here?
Probably both drivers. Either of them could and should have avoided the collision.

Mr Grayson

159 posts

195 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
dibbers006 said:
<Von>
It would be ill-advised to overtake if there is any possibility of the car in front turning across your path.

Better assessment of the scenarios that could be played out would be a preferable future choice.
</Von>

It would go down as 50/50 in the current climate of Insurance, though depending on the exact situation.... I would be pretty fked off if you tried to overtake me as I wanted to turn Right.
Wot 'e said. When you pull out to assess the overtake you need to look at all the potential hazards and that includes farm gates. What if a tractor came OUT of the farm gate as you passed it? eek

Edited by Mr Grayson on Friday 11th September 12:37

Mr Grayson

159 posts

195 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
Wot 'e said, again smile

Keep asking the questions. Good on you for bringing them to a forum, and being interested in the answers.

saaby93

32,038 posts

198 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
this is quite a common farm tractor accident >>

Tractor batting along foot flat to floor at about 30mph
Tractor driver with ear defenders, deaf as farm gate post
Car comes up from behind, overtakes on clear straight road with no 'turnings'
Tractor turns right into field gateway - still with foot flat to floor.
Car either hits side of tractor and chewed up by giant tractor wheel
or brakes & veers off to right and ends up in ditch prior to gateway
or into field

I believe that in the first case the tractor insurance usually pays out as not using due care and attention.

Sometimes tractor driver will claim 'signalled', but this can be obscured by a plough or similar- so again tractor pays out

However if the car's in the ditch or field there's been no collision so tractor insurance will try not to pay.

Does that help?

Edited by saaby93 on Friday 11th September 13:56

eddie1980

419 posts

208 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
My mother had this exact accident when I was little (yes okay that is many years ago), coming to collect me from the baby sitters, turning right into there drive on a national speed limit B road. Small van third back from her decided to overtake the line of slowing traffic. Sun was dead rear and blinded my mothers rear view.

All I really remember is my mum arriving to collect me by coming sideways through the hedge onto the lawn with a van in the drivers side.

5 years of insurance stress later and the case was settled 50/50 although the cynic in me wonders if that could be due to the fact both parties were with the same insurer so it was loose loose for them...

ScoobyChris

2,240 posts

222 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
EP2Nick said:
Responses noted, how do I look?
A few things that might be worth checking....

Get a look in the field if there's a view available - you might glimpse big machinery, eg tractors, or horses and riders, that are close to the road and could become a threat. If there are hedgerows, look for gaps - these are sometimes nicely highlighted by lack of shadows on the road and if that gap is then filled with a shadow chances are something is going to emerge. There are also clues like muddy vehicle tracks on the road which emerge from the side of the road (if there's more mud by the entrance that thins out down the road, chances are the tractor went that way), and also if the road is edged with solid white lines these will become dotted at entrances.

Also worth looking for any signs, eg B&B or tourist information to see if there's any places which someone new to the area may decide to turn into at short notice.

Lots of things to weigh up lol. Not sure where you're based, but if you are interested, there's a taster day in Andover on the 10th October and one of the routes has some good examples of this that I'm sure someone would be happy to talk through with you biggrin

Chris

Edited by ScoobyChris on Friday 11th September 14:24

S. Gonzales Esq.

2,559 posts

232 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
I hope Chris won't mind me adding the link that I'm sure he meant to:

Andover AD Taster Day Thread

vonhosen

40,597 posts

237 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
Blame & insurance claims are a secondary concern, the first is will everyone survive unharmed.

Actively search for offside options of any description & if in doubt hold back. Remember that it's position & speed that determine whether vehicles in front can take that offside option & the slower they are the easier it is for them to do it with little or no warning.

Edited by vonhosen on Friday 11th September 17:01

jarnold88

843 posts

199 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
This infuriates me as I have been in the situation where I'm overtaking a TOOL who decides to try and turn right as I'm alongside! No Indication beforehand, indicator comes on half a second before the T**T wants to turn, he honks his horn then decides to follow me (which he didnt do for long as although he had the superior car, I was the FAR superior driver).

A) if there is no indication, regardless of junctions ahead, the TIT who is turning is at fault! No-brainer!

J

vonhosen

40,597 posts

237 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
jarnold88 said:
This infuriates me as I have been in the situation where I'm overtaking a TOOL who decides to try and turn right as I'm alongside! No Indication beforehand, indicator comes on half a second before the T**T wants to turn, he honks his horn then decides to follow me (which he didnt do for long as although he had the superior car, I was the FAR superior driver).

A) if there is no indication, regardless of junctions ahead, the TIT who is turning is at fault! No-brainer!

J
It's not that simple, there are obligations on all parties & that includes you.

His indicator may not be working etc etc etc. His position, speed and the availability of the option dictate whether he can take it & you shouldn't be overtaking where circumstances dictate there is a realistic possibility that he may turn into an available option (whether signalling or not).

Edited by vonhosen on Friday 11th September 21:50

jarnold88

843 posts

199 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
jarnold88 said:
This infuriates me as I have been in the situation where I'm overtaking a TOOL who decides to try and turn right as I'm alongside! No Indication beforehand, indicator comes on half a second before the T**T wants to turn, he honks his horn then decides to follow me (which he didnt do for long as although he had the superior car, I was the FAR superior driver).

A) if there is no indication, regardless of junctions ahead, the TIT who is turning is at fault! No-brainer!

J
It's not that simple, there are obligations on all parties & that includes you.

His indicator may not be working etc etc etc. His position, speed and the availability of the option dictate whether he can take it & you shouldn't be overtaking where circumstances dictate there is a realistic possibility that he may turn into an available option (whether signalling or not).

Edited by vonhosen on Friday 11th September 21:50
As your meant to check all your lights before you drive anywhere, not saying that I do as I dont, it would be his/her fault entirely for not having a working light and blatantly not checking mirrors etc, and if they did know the light wasn't working they could use their hand to indicate they are turning right.

to be honest i could care less what ya have to say on the situation as if a car is goin so slow that i deem it a waste of my life to stay behind it and it "cuts me up" its their fault not mine.

ScoobyChris

2,240 posts

222 months

Saturday 12th September 2009
quotequote all
Wouldn't it be nicer to be in a position where the chances of an accident were minimal, rather than just going for it regardless and blaming the other party when it all goes Pete Tong? smile

Chris

crisisjez

9,209 posts

225 months

Saturday 12th September 2009
quotequote all
jarnold88 said:
I was the FAR superior driver).
Really?

I would expect a far superior driver to be able to correctly read the road ahead and the intentions of fellow road users.

Drivers rarely, if ever, fail to communicate their actions, wether directly or by more subtle sign, lack of observation however will make it seem like they have.


GreenV8S

30,993 posts

304 months

Saturday 12th September 2009
quotequote all
jarnold88 said:
to be honest i could care less what ya have to say on the situation as if a car is goin so slow that i deem it a waste of my life to stay behind it and it "cuts me up" its their fault not mine.
It's not a case of either/or. If there's a reasonably forseeable risk of the driver moving right, you have to allow for that happening. Maybe they're at fault for not noticing you, but you would be at fault too if you could and should have anticipated them doing that.

And regardless of where the fault lies, putting yourself in danger (deliberately, or because you failed to notice the danger) is obviously a bad idea even if it seems a "waste of your life" to take the extra time to avoid it.

crisisjez

9,209 posts

225 months

Saturday 12th September 2009
quotequote all
Not all tractor drivers are to blame.

I live in the sticks just after a corner and at the start of a half mile straight, which is the only overtaking point for several miles.

There is a 50mph speed limit in place.

If a tractor is ahead I have seen cars 5 and 6 places back blasting past the queue of cars not overtaking as they can see the tractor indicating to turn right into the farm entrance, which is approx 300m after the turn.
This is always followed by a loud screech of brakes and horn blasting as the driver finds his way barred by a wall of metal.
Totally the motorists fault.......

I have also had several instances wher I find myself in the No 1 position behind said tactor and I KNOW that the second I indicate right to turn into my driveway the car behind is downshifting to `follow me past the tractor` .
Que... screeching and horns..........

The mindset for most regulars is to only look at the oncoming side of the road and if its clear, absolutely blast past as many cars as possible.
This once happened as the traffic on his side had been stopped to allow heavy plant to vacate my property, the numpty actually accelerated past at least 10 cars parked on his side before realising that he was about to run down someone in a yellow jacket directing traffic. The guy in the jacket was so scared he actually attacked the car smile
(Was quite funny to see the numpty reversing back with some hairy assed worker chasing after him trying to kick his front grill in )



Edited by crisisjez on Saturday 12th September 00:56

Libertine

3,954 posts

196 months

Saturday 12th September 2009
quotequote all
crisisjez said:
jarnold88 said:
I was the FAR superior driver).
Drivers rarely, if ever, fail to communicate their actions, wether directly or by more subtle sign, lack of observation however will make it seem like they have.
Recently I was driving down a single carriageway,(though wide enough for 1 1/2 cars) and a the Corsa in front of me slowed right down, pulling over to the left, with no indication. I started moving over to the right, ready to
overtake, when....he did a u-turn right in front of me!!, to start heading in the opposite direction! Again, with no indication.

And what does he do when I hoot and shout at the idiot, after a sharp braking manoeuvre? He pulls the bird at me!!

There was no way I could have predicted that he was going to do that. I thought he was slowing down to let a passenger out, not do a stunt like he did.

I don't drive very often, try not to in central London. Drivers do do things that can't be predicted.. That said, I can't count on both hands how many times I've prevented someone crashing into me because I predicted that they were blissfully unaware of what's going on around them, and were about to do something stupid.








p1esk

4,914 posts

216 months

Saturday 12th September 2009
quotequote all
ScoobyChris said:
Wouldn't it be nicer to be in a position where the chances of an accident were minimal, rather than just going for it regardless and blaming the other party when it all goes Pete Tong? smile

Chris
yes

<checks Jamie's profile and makes mental note to avoid Cheshire.>

Best wishes all,
Dave.

vonhosen

40,597 posts

237 months

Saturday 12th September 2009
quotequote all
jarnold88 said:
vonhosen said:
jarnold88 said:
This infuriates me as I have been in the situation where I'm overtaking a TOOL who decides to try and turn right as I'm alongside! No Indication beforehand, indicator comes on half a second before the T**T wants to turn, he honks his horn then decides to follow me (which he didnt do for long as although he had the superior car, I was the FAR superior driver).

A) if there is no indication, regardless of junctions ahead, the TIT who is turning is at fault! No-brainer!

J
It's not that simple, there are obligations on all parties & that includes you.

His indicator may not be working etc etc etc. His position, speed and the availability of the option dictate whether he can take it & you shouldn't be overtaking where circumstances dictate there is a realistic possibility that he may turn into an available option (whether signalling or not).

Edited by vonhosen on Friday 11th September 21:50
As your meant to check all your lights before you drive anywhere, not saying that I do as I dont, it would be his/her fault entirely for not having a working light and blatantly not checking mirrors etc, and if they did know the light wasn't working they could use their hand to indicate they are turning right.

to be honest i could care less what ya have to say on the situation as if a car is goin so slow that i deem it a waste of my life to stay behind it and it "cuts me up" its their fault not mine.
And faults in vehicles occur during journeys too.

Actually it's what you say in relation to where blame lays that doesn't matter. You don't determine blame, others do.

Good drivers don't blame others for collisions (or near misses) they are involved in, they do everything that was in their power to avoid them in the first place & where they are involved in them, they look first at what they could/should have done differently.



Edited by vonhosen on Saturday 12th September 08:53

saaby93

32,038 posts

198 months

Saturday 12th September 2009
quotequote all
crisisjez said:
I have also had several instances wher I find myself in the No 1 position behind said tactor and I KNOW that the second I indicate right to turn into my driveway the car behind is downshifting to `follow me past the tractor` .
I think in fairness that if I was in that situation that I'd be:-
a) dropping back from the tractor beforehand to give everyone else a clue that I was going to do something other than the expected overtaking the tractor.
(after all I'd probably need to drop back to see if anything was oncoming)
or
b) using postioning, early signalling or even a hand signal

If it's a common occurance, even more so wink