Rugby Union question
Rugby Union question
Author
Discussion

x5x3

Original Poster:

2,426 posts

276 months

Sunday 17th October 2010
quotequote all
watching Leicester versus the Scarlets and I have a question. If the defender is running back to get a kicked ball, he usually slides onto it and any attackers then have to let them get to their feet. But what happens if they do not? There was an incident earlier where the Sca guy seemed to stay on the floor waiting for his defence to get back - can the attacker do anything in that situation?

Egg Chaser

4,954 posts

190 months

Sunday 17th October 2010
quotequote all
Usually if the attackers don't let the defender get to his feet, the ref will give a free kick to the defending team. If the defender chooses not to try and get to his feet, then I think play just resumes as normal and the attackers can try and take the ball.

HTH

Martial Arts Man

6,703 posts

209 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
Egg Chaser said:
Usually if the attackers don't let the defender get to his feet, the ref will give a free kick to the defending team. If the defender chooses not to try and get to his feet, then I think play just resumes as normal and the attackers can try and take the ball.

HTH
That seems spot on although I believe it to be a full penalty offence, not a free kick.

TheGreatSoprendo

5,288 posts

272 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
If the defender doesn't get to his feet immediately he has to release the ball which the attacker can pick up and continue with the game.If he doesn't release, it should be a penalty against the defender.

DJC

23,563 posts

259 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
The 2 main incidents for that in the game both involved Alessani Tuig.

The first time he kicked, chased and then went off his feet on the player on the ground and didnt allow him to get up freely. The ref blew.

The second time he kicked, chased, went off his feet on the player but immediately rolled away and stopped interfering with the player to show the ref he had learnt from the previous indescretion. The ref didnt blow.

For the defender, the important rule is no playing the ball whilst you are off your feet. So he can lie there all he wants, but he cannot protect the ball unless he returns to a position whereby he is supporting himself with his feet on the ground, ie not on knees.

x5x3

Original Poster:

2,426 posts

276 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
DJC said:
The 2 main incidents for that in the game both involved Alessani Tuig.

The first time he kicked, chased and then went off his feet on the player on the ground and didnt allow him to get up freely. The ref blew.

The second time he kicked, chased, went off his feet on the player but immediately rolled away and stopped interfering with the player to show the ref he had learnt from the previous indescretion. The ref didnt blow.

For the defender, the important rule is no playing the ball whilst you are off your feet. So he can lie there all he wants, but he cannot protect the ball unless he returns to a position whereby he is supporting himself with his feet on the ground, ie not on knees.
yes I saw both incidents, the second one he did not really have much choice as he was shoved in the back which I guess the ref just saw as accidental. The first one was the one which caused me to question the rules as he seemed to pause before jumping on the guy as if he was waiting for him to try to get up.

I still do not understand this fully, if a player picks up the ball and just lies on the floor then he surely does not have to release the ball until he is tackled? but if an attacker cannot touch him until he gets up then i do not see how this works as he could in theory lie there all day?

TheGreatSoprendo

5,288 posts

272 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
x5x3 said:
DJC said:
The 2 main incidents for that in the game both involved Alessani Tuig.

The first time he kicked, chased and then went off his feet on the player on the ground and didnt allow him to get up freely. The ref blew.

The second time he kicked, chased, went off his feet on the player but immediately rolled away and stopped interfering with the player to show the ref he had learnt from the previous indescretion. The ref didnt blow.

For the defender, the important rule is no playing the ball whilst you are off your feet. So he can lie there all he wants, but he cannot protect the ball unless he returns to a position whereby he is supporting himself with his feet on the ground, ie not on knees.
yes I saw both incidents, the second one he did not really have much choice as he was shoved in the back which I guess the ref just saw as accidental. The first one was the one which caused me to question the rules as he seemed to pause before jumping on the guy as if he was waiting for him to try to get up.

I still do not understand this fully, if a player picks up the ball and just lies on the floor then he surely does not have to release the ball until he is tackled? but if an attacker cannot touch him until he gets up then i do not see how this works as he could in theory lie there all day?
There's nothing to stop the attacking player competing for the ball provided he is on his feet. What he cannot do is just flop on top of the defender. If the defending player is lying still on the floor he is effectively out of the game and cannot (legally) hold onto the ball.

ewenm

28,506 posts

268 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
x5x3 said:
I still do not understand this fully, if a player picks up the ball and just lies on the floor then he surely does not have to release the ball until he is tackled? but if an attacker cannot touch him until he gets up then i do not see how this works as he could in theory lie there all day?
If you're off your feet (so lying on the ground with the ball) you MUST release it to players on their feet. In the case where you slide in to collect a ball, an attacker must give you a chance to get up before tackling you but if you don't get up you must release the ball, so the attacker can then collect the ball.

The defender's choices are get up or release the ball. The attacker's choices are tackle the standing player or collect the released ball. I think.

TheGreatSoprendo

5,288 posts

272 months

x5x3

Original Poster:

2,426 posts

276 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
thanks all for the replies, I understand the situation now and can try to explain to my son who is just getting into rugby (he is 10!) and keeps asking me about various rules, some of which I can answer and some I cannot!

pugwash4x4

7,644 posts

244 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
basically slide down and gatther the ball, then either of:

get on your feet with the ball and run off (hopefully),
get up and leave the ball on the ground and try and create a ruck (you won't see this happen)
stay on the ground and hope you have team mates arriving PDQ to form a ruck over the top of you to slow down recycling (rare nowadays, but its a good way of forming a defensive base- as it creates strong off side positions, slows the game down, and allows defense to regroup),
or stay on the ground and release the ball which anyone on their feet can then pick up- often the worse choice as the attacker will pickup the ball and go and score.