Blatant handball missed by ref & linesman
Blatant handball missed by ref & linesman
Author
Discussion

Cleaning Van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
What do you think of this clip?

Possibly one of the worst 'misses' by referees I've ever seen.

rofl

"Should've gone to SpecSavers"

Blyth Sparts vs Droylsden, FA Cup

Edited by Cleaning Van Man on Wednesday 9th February 12:36

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

255 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
While admittedly blatant, Ive seen worse decisions.
From teh angle of that video (roughly where the linesman would be) at normal speed you can't tell for certain that it was his hand and not his head.
COuldn't see where the ref was.

Cleaning Van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
I suspect the linesmans view may have been obscured by the goal posts....I love the way that the whole stadium bar 3 people saw the incident.

Stevenj214

4,941 posts

251 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
While admittedly blatant, Ive seen worse decisions.
From teh angle of that video (roughly where the linesman would be) at normal speed you can't tell for certain that it was his hand and not his head.
COuldn't see where the ref was.
The linesman would have been in line with the goal line

Cleaning Van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Stevenj214 said:
The linesman would have been in line with the goal line
That was mypoint. You'll have to forgive BSR, he's not really into football. He supports Tottenham.

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

255 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Cleaning Van Man said:
That was mypoint. You'll have to forgive BSR, he's not really into football. He supports Tottenham.
...except that just makes his view even worse confused
His view of the ball would be obstructed by both the post and the players head.

jodypress

2,059 posts

297 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
I thought it was a cracking save smile

Cleaning Van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
jodypress said:
I thought it was a cracking save smile
me too. Maybe Chelsea should sign him up.

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

255 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
...except that just makes his view even worse confused
His view of the ball would be obstructed by both the post and the players head.
FFS, Ive just noticed that was you NP.
I'd have been much less rude but more rude if Id have realised.
You utter wker.
Why do people change thier name so I dont recognise them any more?????

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

255 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
ANd what have I missed? Why are you CVM?

hornetrider

63,161 posts

228 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Suarez-esque

Cleaning Van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
FFS, Ive just noticed that was you NP.
I'd have been much less rude but more rude if Id have realised.
You utter wker.
Why do people change thier name so I dont recognise them any more?????
Are you talking to yourself you fool or me?

Yep...NP Surprised you haven't stalked me on Facebook, TA wink

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

262 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Last season when Bristol City played Crystal Palace, Palace scored a goal where the ball went right to the back of the goal (couldn't of gone any further), hit some kind of support and came out again. All of the officials said it never crossed the line. The video (and everyone on TV) saw the ball hit the back of the net. Suprise, surprise the Fotball league clamed copyright on the video clip and pulled it from the internet. Looks like they didn't want any evidence of how appalling the standard of refereeing has been over the last few years. It's an ideal example of where video playback would be perfect. Everyone on TV saw the replay 10 seconds later, so why not the referee on the big screen at the ground? Simply appaling. There are still loads of references to theincident on the web but any viseo reference comes up with the same message "The Football League has claimed copyright". What a cover-up.

Cleaning Van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
and there was a similar one where Reading played (Watford?) and the ball cross the bi-line OUTISIDE of the goal, hit something, bounced back in and they gave a goal!!

Even the other players said it never went in but they still gave it.

Odd.

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

262 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Cleaning Van Man said:
and there was a similar one where Reading played (Watford?) and the ball cross the bi-line OUTISIDE of the goal, hit something, bounced back in and they gave a goal!!

Even the other players said it never went in but they still gave it.

Odd.
... but clearly seen on TV?

Cleaning Van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

262 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Cleaning Van Man said:
so once more, what's the big deal in the ref taking 10-20 seconds to see the replay and change his decision based on real facts?

Cleaning Van Man

Original Poster:

29,977 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
my opinion entirely.

apart from one issue:

What happens if the other team clear the ball, go up the other end and score, but the ref then decides to bring play back?

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

255 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Cleaning Van Man said:
Are you talking to yourself you fool or me?

Yep...NP Surprised you haven't stalked me on Facebook, TA wink
Just have. Feels a bit bummery approaching stange men onthe internet. I like it.