Pakistani cricket and the spot-fixing affair
Pakistani cricket and the spot-fixing affair
Author
Discussion

DrYazz

Original Poster:

881 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Would be interested in gathering some thoughts on the long-running story regarding the deliberate no-balls bowled by the Pakistanis on last years England tour.

In particular, was the whole story massively sensationalised and over-reported?

Was the whole affair exaggerated in both the sports and news sections of newspapers, radio and TV news? Or was the coverage commensurate and fair?

Right now (9th Feb 2011 19:00 CET) it is headline news on the BBC Sport website and is prominent on the main BBC News page. This on an evening of major international football.

PaulHogan

7,210 posts

301 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Coverage was apt. Cheating may be common and of little consequence in Pakistan but is intolerable on the international stage.

DrYazz

Original Poster:

881 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
PaulHogan said:
Coverage was apt. Cheating may be common and of little consequence in Pakistan but is intolerable on the international stage.
A couple of no-balls were thrown. Not cheating to gain an on-field or in-game advantage though, is it?

hornetrider

63,161 posts

228 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
DrYazz said:
In particular, was the whole story massively sensationalised and over-reported?
No.

DrYazz said:
Was the whole affair exaggerated in both the sports and news sections of newspapers, radio and TV news?
No.

DrYazz said:
Right now (9th Feb 2011 19:00 CET) it is headline news on the BBC Sport website and is prominent on the main BBC News page. This on an evening of major international football.
It's only friendlies.

DrYazz

Original Poster:

881 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
I make you wrong there, Horneyrider.

Even though I was abroad over the entire episode, I was a little surprised by the number of pictures with policemen and police cars in and around Lords cricket ground.

Totally over the top, in my opinion, and very blatant.

And irresponsible.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

228 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
DrYazz said:
I make you wrong there
Once more in English please.

DrYazz

Original Poster:

881 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Once more in English please.
Horneyrider, invest in a dictionary, and if required, take some English classes.

Gun

13,432 posts

241 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
There's no real difference between match fixing or spot fixing, in both you are altering the game to aid organised crime. I'd have banned all those Pakistani cricketers from the game for life.

DrYazz

Original Poster:

881 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Gun said:
There's no real difference between match fixing or spot fixing, in both you are altering the game to aid organised crime. I'd have banned all those Pakistani cricketers from the game for life.
Organised crime? I thought it was just a bunch of bookies. Bent bookies, but bookies nonetheless.

Is your view the same for those involved in horse racing scandals and the likes of Grobelaar and others implicated several years ago?

Gun

13,432 posts

241 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
DrYazz said:
Gun said:
There's no real difference between match fixing or spot fixing, in both you are altering the game to aid organised crime. I'd have banned all those Pakistani cricketers from the game for life.
Organised crime? I thought it was just a bunch of bookies. Bent bookies, but bookies nonetheless.

Is your view the same for those involved in horse racing scandals and the likes of Grobelaar and others implicated several years ago?
That is organised crime though, this spot fixing wasn't organised by a bookie who'd flown over to the UK from Pakistan to ask a bowler to bowl the odd no ball, there will be hundreds of people involved in this.

As for the other instances, yes my stance is the same, if you cheat you should get banned for life, you're bringing the game you're involved in into disrepute and therefore can no longer be trusted to play the game in a fair manner.

jas xjr

11,309 posts

262 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
i was approached over ten years ago by a dodgy chap who had a lot of business interests in the uk and india.
he told me he could fix cricket matches and wanted to gamble on them. not knowing anything about either i politely declined. at the time i thought it would be difficult to fix a cricket match and did not know that you could bet on the number of no balls etc. so it has been going on for a while. how widespread it is i do not know. this guy certainly had the money and the contacts.
i am sure it is not an exclusively sub continent issue.

DrYazz

Original Poster:

881 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
Anysways (Horneyrider, is that word acceptable to you scratchchin anysways), I picked up the Daily Mail on Sunday February 6th from Gate 24D on my flight out of Heathrow Terminal 3, and the back page headline was......

Pakistan CRICKETERS BANNED by ICC anti-corruption tribunal

with the word banned being emphasised with colouring and significantly larger fonts.

Not a regular Daily Mail reader, nor have I studied the way they use fonts and colours, but again, I thought the way this was emphasised was a bit OTT.

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

254 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
IMHO, it's a perfectly balanced and proportionate response from the ICC, and a reasonable one from the UK judiciary (though you might find it petering out as public interest kicks in).

They were caught deliberately altering the result of a competitive game, for pecuniary reward. Same reponse would have been forthcoming had they been dropping catches - that's the point of the laws. Its not the impact, it's the intention that counts.

DrYazz

Original Poster:

881 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th February 2011
quotequote all
randlemarcus said:
IMHO, it's a perfectly balanced and proportionate response from the ICC, and a reasonable one from the UK judiciary (though you might find it petering out as public interest kicks in).

They were caught deliberately altering the result of a competitive game, for pecuniary reward. Same reponse would have been forthcoming had they been dropping catches - that's the point of the laws. Its not the impact, it's the intention that counts.
I am not questioning the ICC decision or condoning the players. Punishment is deserved and cheats must be rooted out.
I found the nature of the reporting, and in particular the imagery, with police officers with firearms to border on the absurd.

Bing o

15,184 posts

242 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
Does the OP actually know anything about cricket, or indeed what he is talking about?

I doubt it somehow.

fathomfive

11,031 posts

213 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
DrYazz said:
I am not questioning the ICC decision or condoning the players. Punishment is deserved and cheats must be rooted out.
I found the nature of the reporting, and in particular the imagery, with police officers with firearms to border on the absurd.
So is this really about pictures of police officers with guns, not [Boycott]crikkit[/Boycott]?

DJC

23,563 posts

259 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
Let me take a wild stab at this Yazzy. You are from Pakistani origins. You think the British media are guilty of stirring up anti-Pakistan sentiment just because of where the players from. If they werent from Pakistan they would have not have been so sensational in their reporting. You think the British media have been racist and had an agenda from the start.

Either that or you must really want a plasic population!

Black can man

31,973 posts

191 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
Five years is nowhere near enough , i know if these where English players caught doing this , they would never play for England again , Obviously guilty & the ICC should have banned them for life


hornetrider

63,161 posts

228 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Does the OP actually know anything about cricket, or indeed what he is talking about?
Evidence from his other erudite conributions to this forum would suggest an answer in the negative.


ewenm

28,506 posts

268 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
DrYazz said:
Would be interested in gathering some thoughts on the long-running story regarding the deliberate no-balls bowled by the Pakistanis on last years England tour.

In particular, was the whole story massively sensationalised and over-reported?

Was the whole affair exaggerated in both the sports and news sections of newspapers, radio and TV news? Or was the coverage commensurate and fair?

Right now (9th Feb 2011 19:00 CET) it is headline news on the BBC Sport website and is prominent on the main BBC News page. This on an evening of major international football.
I have no issue with the reporting of the cricketing cheats. I do have an issue with you describing last night's matches as "major international football". That's over-hyping and sensationalising.