Which of these MTB's would you choose?
Which of these MTB's would you choose?
Author
Discussion

DoctorX

Original Poster:

8,231 posts

196 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
I have a £700 voucher on the way from Ride2Work and I fancy a MTB for some fun on the local tracks and trails and to *cough* ride to work. Limited to Evans only which rules out some of the highly regarded bikes at this budget but these two take my fancy. Anybody have any experience or suggest which is the better buy (or is there anything else worth considering?).

http://www.evanscycles.com/products/trek/mamba-201...

http://www.evanscycles.com/products/scott/scale-97...

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
Spec wise, they are very much the same, however some quick searches indicate that the Scott weighs 28.1 lbs and the Trek weighs closer to 33 lbs...

DoctorX

Original Poster:

8,231 posts

196 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
That could be a clincher as I'm a fat bd and every little helps...

Thanks!

CoolC

4,500 posts

243 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
Chuck in £50 of your own and get this:

http://www.evanscycles.com/products/charge/cooker-...


DoctorX

Original Poster:

8,231 posts

196 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
Any compelling reason? Was it really worth a grand?

ETA not many gears there is there?

Edited by DoctorX on Wednesday 20th March 22:09

Gizmoish

18,150 posts

238 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all

DoctorX

Original Poster:

8,231 posts

196 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Yes, that looks nice too, although some of the components/fork look lower spec to my very untrained eye (but Cannondale frames supposedly good?). As I don't plan on ever doing any 'hard core' off roading, do you think I'd ever appreciate the difference of Deore vs. Alivio components or the Rockshox fork of the Trek vs. the Suntour of the others?

Edited by DoctorX on Thursday 21st March 08:16

CoolC

4,500 posts

243 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
DoctorX said:
Any compelling reason? Was it really worth a grand?

ETA not many gears there is there?

Edited by DoctorX on Wednesday 20th March 22:09
Rock Shox forks, and a slight step up in components. Plus nothing looks quite as good as a thin tubed steel frame biggrin

P-Jay

11,405 posts

220 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
That charge will be a cool bike, and it's 10sp which is a bonus over the 9sp others, 9sp stuff is getting harder to find in anything but very high-end or very low-end spec and it's an expensive pain to switch to 10sp later, as I've just found out...

Still can't get excited about 29ers though, fugly things.

Matt106

383 posts

193 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
That charge will be a cool bike, and it's 10sp which is a bonus over the 9sp others, 9sp stuff is getting harder to find in anything but very high-end or very low-end spec and it's an expensive pain to switch to 10sp later, as I've just found out...

Still can't get excited about 29ers though, fugly things.
I'd want 10 speed, I seem to struggle with 9 on my XC bike however I'm using a single front ring. The Charge looks like a nicely spec'd bike for the money just a shame about the odd size wheels wink

DoctorX

Original Poster:

8,231 posts

196 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
I agree the Charge is a nice bike but the lack of a third cog at the front suggests hill climbing might be more challenging...

CoolC

4,500 posts

243 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
It has 38/24 chainrings, so more like not having a big ring than loosing the granny.

hadenough!

3,785 posts

289 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Gears are for girls anyway

DoctorX

Original Poster:

8,231 posts

196 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
CoolC said:
It has 38/24 chainrings, so more like not having a big ring than loosing the granny.
Ahhhh. Thanks thumbup

CoolC

4,500 posts

243 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
hadenough! said:
Gears are for girls anyone who like their knees to still work
Fixed that for you wink

yellowjack

18,450 posts

195 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Charge - mingin'

Just my opinion, don't let it sway you. Like someone else said, I just can not get along with the aesthetics of a 29er.

Straight fight, head to head, between the Scott and the Trek, the Trek gets my money. How much help my opinion is, I don't know, but you asked the question, and there's my answer.

If it was me, I'd go try both bikes, side by side. See which one fits better. Try to go into the shop with an open mind. Ultimately the desire to ride more often will be greater on the bike that appeals to you the most, and that's not a decision I'd be comfortable making from seeing a couple of internet images.

wink Fuji Nevada @ £680 - http://www.evanscycles.com/products/fuji/nevada-11...

yellowjack

18,450 posts

195 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Charge - mingin'

Just my opinion, don't let it sway you. Like someone else said, I just can not get along with the aesthetics of a 29er.

Straight fight, head to head, between the Scott and the Trek, the Trek gets my money. How much help my opinion is, I don't know, but you asked the question, and there's my answer.

If it was me, I'd go try both bikes, side by side. See which one fits better. Try to go into the shop with an open mind. Ultimately the desire to ride more often will be greater on the bike that appeals to you the most, and that's not a decision I'd be comfortable making from seeing a couple of internet images.

wink Fuji Nevada @ £680 - http://www.evanscycles.com/products/fuji/nevada-11...


confused Oops! Sorry 'bout the double post - no idea what happened there. confused

Edited by yellowjack on Friday 22 March 07:42

Gooby

9,269 posts

263 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
33lbs for a hard tail?? What is it made from? Granite? That would be a lardy full sus, but a hard tail? That is epic!

DoctorX

Original Poster:

8,231 posts

196 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Charge - mingin'

Just my opinion, don't let it sway you. Like someone else said, I just can not get along with the aesthetics of a 29er.

Straight fight, head to head, between the Scott and the Trek, the Trek gets my money. How much help my opinion is, I don't know, but you asked the question, and there's my answer.

If it was me, I'd go try both bikes, side by side. See which one fits better. Try to go into the shop with an open mind. Ultimately the desire to ride more often will be greater on the bike that appeals to you the most, and that's not a decision I'd be comfortable making from seeing a couple of internet images.

wink Fuji Nevada @ £680 - http://www.evanscycles.com/products/fuji/nevada-11...
Thanks for the advice, hoping to check a few out this weekend.

yellowjack

18,450 posts

195 months

Friday 22nd March 2013
quotequote all
DoctorX said:
Thanks for the advice, hoping to check a few out this weekend.
2 for 1 deal on that advice too. No idea what happened there.