Canyon vs Planet X
Author
Discussion

TheFungle

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

235 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
On the surface very similar companies, direct order and both offering very good VFM, however they would appear to be percieved completely differently.

Canyon appear to have a reputation for super high quality with a low price tag whereas Planet X seem to be a low price tag with not so high quality and are simply rebranded, generic Chinese frames.

Is this the case? Canyon supply a World Tour team, does this make them better? Is it that they are German and thus seen as a bit more exotic?


itsnotarace

4,685 posts

238 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
Canyons frames are made in the far east too but they spend a lot of money on R&D and developing their own kit like the new VCLS seat post, rather than just taking an existing design frame asnd rebadging it. None of Canyons frames are open mould

TheFungle

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

235 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
itsnotarace said:
Canyons frames are made in the far east too but they spend a lot of money on R&D and developing their own kit like the new VCLS seat post, rather than just taking an existing design frame asnd rebadging it. None of Canyons frames are open mould
That's pretty much what I thought, I'm sure on the German cycling websites they aren't recommending Planet X as the 'go to' value for money brand.

I've never really considered a Canyon before, however the latest Ultimate CF SLX is rather lovely.

GaryGlitter

2,289 posts

212 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
Some of the early PX carbon stuff might have been generic, now a lot is to their own spec/design. Get over to Rotherham and have a look in the showroom for yourself, I'm guessing you've never seen one to actually judge on the quality.

Canyon is a big brand in Germany so the mags will favour them, PX has no presence in Germany.

Gargamel

16,366 posts

290 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all

Don't really know about the Planet X frames, I do know that the Sram double tap shifter that came with the PX bike my friend has, can frighten the birds at 100 paces.

Sounds a bit like gunfire when changing down and still pressing.


TheFungle

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

235 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
GaryGlitter said:
Some of the early PX carbon stuff might have been generic, now a lot is to their own spec/design. Get over to Rotherham and have a look in the showroom for yourself, I'm guessing you've never seen one to actually judge on the quality.

Canyon is a big brand in Germany so the mags will favour them, PX has no presence in Germany.
You guess wrong.

There are plenty of things I like about PX, the bikes however don't do a lot for me, from a perceived technical viewpoint and also aesthetically.



GaryGlitter

2,289 posts

212 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
TheFungle said:
GaryGlitter said:
Some of the early PX carbon stuff might have been generic, now a lot is to their own spec/design. Get over to Rotherham and have a look in the showroom for yourself, I'm guessing you've never seen one to actually judge on the quality.

Canyon is a big brand in Germany so the mags will favour them, PX has no presence in Germany.
You guess wrong.

There are plenty of things I like about PX, the bikes however don't do a lot for me, from a perceived technical viewpoint and also aesthetically.
Then I don't see what the point of the OP was, are the looking to purchase or just wanting to have a Canyon v PX opinion poll?

IroningMan

10,598 posts

275 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
Not sure that Planet-X's stuff is 'open mold' - if by that you mean that they pick a frame from a manufacturer's catalogue and stick their logo on it. They employ some pretty able frame designers and as I understand it some elements of some of their frames have appeared elsewhere because they've traded the rights for a lower delivered cost.

I also imagine they're rather smaller than Canyon.

TheFungle

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

235 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
GaryGlitter said:
TheFungle said:
GaryGlitter said:
Some of the early PX carbon stuff might have been generic, now a lot is to their own spec/design. Get over to Rotherham and have a look in the showroom for yourself, I'm guessing you've never seen one to actually judge on the quality.

Canyon is a big brand in Germany so the mags will favour them, PX has no presence in Germany.
You guess wrong.

There are plenty of things I like about PX, the bikes however don't do a lot for me, from a perceived technical viewpoint and also aesthetically.
Then I don't see what the point of the OP was, are the looking to purchase or just wanting to have a Canyon v PX opinion poll?
The point being that they both offer a similar sales model of being direct sales yet the most commonly held view is that Canyon are a high end bike manufacturer whereas PX (or Ribble etc)seem to have more of a reputation of being a re-packager of generic frames with often high end groupsets attached.


anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
TheFungle said:
The point being that they both offer a similar sales model of being direct sales yet the most commonly held view is that Canyon are a high end bike manufacturer whereas PX (or Ribble etc)seem to have more of a reputation of being a re-packager of generic frames with often high end groupsets attached.
I viewed them as being much the same, just from different countries. What is it that makes you think canyon is more high end than Planet X?

TheFungle

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

235 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
el stovey said:
TheFungle said:
The point being that they both offer a similar sales model of being direct sales yet the most commonly held view is that Canyon are a high end bike manufacturer whereas PX (or Ribble etc)seem to have more of a reputation of being a re-packager of generic frames with often high end groupsets attached.
I viewed them as being much the same, just from different countries. What is it that makes you think canyon is more high end than Planet X?
Marketing wink

Which you could argue encompasses the fact they supply a World Tour team, appear in 'superbike' tests within magazines and for a any given 'What £3k bike should I buy?' thread it is likley Canyon will appear as a recommendation whereas it's unlikley that PX/Ribble et al. will be mentioned.

JuniorD

9,013 posts

252 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
Planet X = Skoda Favorit

(Boardman = Skoda Octavia 1.9 tdi)

Canyon = Skoda Octavia VRS

Nothing much wrong with any of them but I think Canyon trumps Planet X. I'd rather have an alu Canyon than a Planet X.

okgo

42,139 posts

227 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
They supply a world tour team, end of story. If Gilbert can ride one to victory it will be ok for anyone else.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
JuniorD said:
Planet X = Skoda Favorit

(Boardman = Skoda Octavia 1.9 tdi)

Canyon = Skoda Octavia VRS

Nothing much wrong with any of them but I think Canyon trumps Planet X. I'd rather have an alu Canyon than a Planet X.
You do realise that Boardman, Planet X and Canyon offer more than one model dont you? wink

tonto1

442 posts

231 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
el stovey said:
I viewed them as being much the same, just from different countries. What is it that makes you think canyon is more high end than Planet X?
Several stage wins in this year Giro!

milu

2,513 posts

295 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
I have a Planet x.
Strikes me that they are giving a good product that will satisfy most people most of the time at a reasonable price.

I recently bought two shirts too..same again,perfectly fine quality but inexpensive. Makes a change for companies to be in the real world IMO.

mcelliott

10,503 posts

210 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
milu said:
I have a Planet x.
Strikes me that they are giving a good product that will satisfy most people most of the time at a reasonable price.

I recently bought two shirts too..same again,perfectly fine quality but inexpensive. Makes a change for companies to be in the real world IMO.
I have one too, and absolutely love it. I'm just relieved that I'm so slow on a pushbike that I won't have the embarrassment of having to ride it in a world tour event.

Jimbo.

4,221 posts

218 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
Nowt wrong with either. If racing is to be used as a measure, how many club/regional/national TTs, triathlons and road races have been won on Planet Xs? Lots, i'm guessing.

Canyon are big. Very big. They've Planet Xs sales method, but with the clout/tech up there (if maybe not quite as much) as Giant, Merida etc, etc.

Hobzy

1,271 posts

240 months

Monday 10th June 2013
quotequote all
I have a Canyon and a Planet X. Both brilliant for the money (MTB though). I can't fault the CF Whippet Frame. My road bike is a stock Scott, but if i was to upgrade, even though I love the look of the Canyon road bikes, I'd build up a PlanetX CF road frame I think...