Why tight bicycle shorts?
Why tight bicycle shorts?
Author
Discussion

Fotic

Original Poster:

719 posts

158 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
As a MTB rider now on a roadie I tend to wear normal shorts. Nothing massive, just a pair of snug fitting shorts with a few pockets and a pad.

However I'm feeling like I'm missing out on something - tight shorts. Why are they the default for road riders? What advantage is there?? Should I buy some and if so, why are they all like Victorian strongman leotards rather than just shorts?

Jimbo.

4,222 posts

218 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Fotic said:
As a MTB rider now on a roadie I tend to wear normal shorts. Nothing massive, just a pair of snug fitting shorts with a few pockets and a pad.

However I'm feeling like I'm missing out on something - tight shorts. Why are they the default for road riders? What advantage is there?? Should I buy some and if so, why are they all like Victorian strongman leotards rather than just shorts?
No bunching, chaffing etc, and better sweat wicking. And they hold the chamois in place.
Shorts are crap: the band cuts in and/or they ride down. The "leotards" to which you refer (aka bib shorts) get ride of both problems.

JuniorD

9,013 posts

252 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Aerodynamic, tidy, comfortable and bugs can't go up your legs

BaronVonVaderham

2,322 posts

176 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
They make you more attractive to your fellow roadies... wink

MiseryStreak

2,929 posts

236 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Just try some. Wear them under baggy shorts if you're scared but DON'T WEAR BOXERS UNDERNEATH, defeats the point. They are horrible perverted looking things but you will get why people wear them on your first long ride.

Fotic

Original Poster:

719 posts

158 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
MiseryStreak said:
Just try some. Wear them under baggy shorts if you're scared but DON'T WEAR BOXERS UNDERNEATH, defeats the point. They are horrible perverted looking things but you will get why people wear them on your first long ride.
Will do. I'm terrified but ill try them.

Jonnny

29,897 posts

218 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
They're brilliant, theres a reason why everyone who rides a road bike wears them.

TheLemming

4,319 posts

294 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Jonnny said:
They're brilliant, theres a reason why everyone who rides a road bike wears them.
I fought the call of lycra for a while, obviously I felt I'd look like a massive dhead.....

A couple of months later, I'm in bib shorts and a jersey every time for using the road bike. The comfort difference is epic.
Other than a possible lycra fetish, they are comfier, breathe better (makes a huge difference) and just all round feel "better".

There's an element of "thats how its done so thats how we do it" but it really is such an improvement.

Saddle bum

4,211 posts

248 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
It must be in here somewhere.


Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

181 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
I wear them as it means people don't sit next to me on the train

gazza285

11,167 posts

237 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
There comes a point where instead of feeling ridiculous and self conscious when you wear them, if you wear anything but you feel ridiculous and self conscious.

WarrenG

345 posts

226 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
I thought I'd be too fat and a MAMIL for wearing all that - or worse - "what do you think you are? bloody TDF rider or summink?"

I did look fat last year, now I look podgy only (20lbs lighter) and no-one has given me grief for trying to present myself as a racer, even in my retro maillot jaune that was given as gift by an old codger who was giving up about 20yrs ago.

it's definitely about the comfort and speed - you don't want any flapping things whipping away at you on a descent at 40mph! Even putting on the wind-proof that isn't skin-tight feels like a massive compromise, but cold/wet has to be blocked sooner or later.

I even converted to arm/knee warmers, which I previously regarded as worse than frilly suspenders!

Gargamel

16,366 posts

290 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Saddle bum said:
It must be in here somewhere.
No gaps.

I have some non bib shorts, whenever I get on the drops a gap appears at the back.

Hateful things.

47p2

1,905 posts

190 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Can't beat a nice bit of tight lycra eek


yellowjack

18,456 posts

195 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
WarrenG said:
<snip>

I even converted to arm/knee warmers, which I previously regarded as worse than frilly suspenders!
Ha! I got some of those bad-boys earlier this year from either Aldi or Lidl. I used the arm warmers for the first time recently, and they were brilliant, keeping the chill wind off my arms yet not causing my core to overheat. I still haven't tried the knee warmers, as they seem like a step too far for now. No doubt that will change as the weather turns all 'autumny' in the next few weeks. I've still not converted to bibshorts yet, nor can I talk of wearing 'tights' in anything other than hushed tones. I'm being assimilated, albeit one step at a time wink

WarrenG

345 posts

226 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Ha! I got some of those bad-boys earlier this year from either Aldi or Lidl. I used the arm warmers for the first time recently, and they were brilliant, keeping the chill wind off my arms yet not causing my core to overheat. I still haven't tried the knee warmers, as they seem like a step too far for now. No doubt that will change as the weather turns all 'autumny' in the next few weeks. I've still not converted to bibshorts yet, nor can I talk of wearing 'tights' in anything other than hushed tones. I'm being assimilated, albeit one step at a time wink
Bib shorts are fantastic, no waistband discomfort or gaps, and cold winter mornings to work are the reason to buy bib-tights. Bib-knickers however - well - it sounds like pure faggotry. but really it's bib-shorts with knee warmers attached. I go to work at 6:30 at 12C and come home at 16:00 at 22C I need those add ons and layers to avoid taking two full kits in a bag!

Longers

4,505 posts

257 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
.... nor can I talk of wearing 'tights' in anything other than hushed tones.
or, perhaps even worse, "knickers"!! I still and will continue to refer to them as leggings and 3/4 lengths respectively wink

AyBee

11,324 posts

231 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
To show how manly we are wink


Funkateer

990 posts

204 months

Thursday 5th September 2013
quotequote all
Fotic said:
MiseryStreak said:
Just try some. Wear them under baggy shorts if you're scared but DON'T WEAR BOXERS UNDERNEATH, defeats the point. They are horrible perverted looking things but you will get why people wear them on your first long ride.
Will do. I'm terrified but ill try them.
Nothing worse than a rocky descent with the jackhammer effect of the saddle on the nads which hang more pendulously when one is wearing boxers under the baggies!

Bibs every time!