Crank: How much play is ok?
Crank: How much play is ok?
Author
Discussion

Devil2575

Original Poster:

13,400 posts

217 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
How much play is too much on a bike crank?
The end of the crank arms have about 3mm movement.

This is on a well used bike. Just wondering if it needs new bearings.

anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
best to sort before it self destructs...what BB is it ?

FD3Si

857 posts

173 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
Shouldn't really be any to be honest.
3mm is deffo too much.

AndrewEH1

4,922 posts

182 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
Yeah, way too much play. Drop by your LBS, might need a new BB (and maybe new cranks if this play has damaged the crank threads/splines).

Depending on the age of your bike the bearings inside the BB aren't really designed to be replaced.

Edited by AndrewEH1 on Sunday 30th October 19:39

Devil2575

Original Poster:

13,400 posts

217 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
I'll see if I can split the crank. It hasn't stood up to well to neing used through two winters.

It's a 2013 bike.

ecsrobin

18,644 posts

194 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
I'll see if I can split the crank. It hasn't stood up to well to neing used through two winters.

It's a 2013 bike.
What bike is it?

If it's a square bottom bracket you could be looking at new cranks and BB from past experience.

gazza285

11,113 posts

237 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
Your bottom bracket has a slight bit of play in it, these are inexpensive, and easily changed with the right tools. There's a chance that the excessive friction may cause global warming and destabilise the fragile ecosystems of the Earth, thus rendering it barren to all life. Best get down to your LBS before Armageddon strikes us all dead...

TwistingMyMelon

6,506 posts

234 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
As above bet it is the BB, especially if it is the new shimano outer shell ones

My winter bike gets through one every 10 months, but they are only £16

I often only realise when the bike starts "clanging" over rough surfaces and Ive had play in it for months before I got round to sorting.Ive never had one go completely on me, just more and more play

Devil2575

Original Poster:

13,400 posts

217 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
Devil2575 said:
I'll see if I can split the crank. It hasn't stood up to well to neing used through two winters.

It's a 2013 bike.
What bike is it?

If it's a square bottom bracket you could be looking at new cranks and BB from past experience.
Boardman Roadsport.

A work mate has had a look at it and is going to lend me the tools to strip out the BB. He also thinks that it's fooked.

torqueofthedevil

2,088 posts

206 months

Tuesday 1st November 2016
quotequote all
Had this on a carbon trek - the BB suddenly completely collapsed about 20 miles from home. Train back only to then find that the movement had ruined the frame!

Devil2575

Original Poster:

13,400 posts

217 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
Got my BB out and it's fooked.



I can get a straight replacement for £10

Or is it worth spending more to get a better one? The bike is going to be my winter commuter so it has to put up with salt and general abuse. Will a more expensive BB cope much better or is it just worth factoring in the cost of chsnging it more regularly?

ecsrobin

18,644 posts

194 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
Got my BB out and it's fooked.



I can get a straight replacement for £10

Or is it worth spending more to get a better one? The bike is going to be my winter commuter so it has to put up with salt and general abuse. Will a more expensive BB cope much better or is it just worth factoring in the cost of chsnging it more regularly?
Check your crank arms as well. They are likely to also be damaged if a square tapered is damaged.

Devil2575

Original Poster:

13,400 posts

217 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
Check your crank arms as well. They are likely to also be damaged if a square tapered is damaged.
Square taper is fine. All the play is in the bearings.

timnoyce

413 posts

210 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
From experience, there is nothing wrong with a square taper bottom bracket. I've also found them to actually last a lot longer than the more modern replacements. Realistically, you're going to be looking at £50-£60 for a new chainset and bottom bracket if you upgrade to a Shimano Deore. It will be an improvement, but probably not a very noticeable one.

I'd pay the £10 for a replacement and make sure it's well greased, then when that one wears out you'll probably be ready for a new chainset as you'll need to replace the chainrings by then too.

AndrewEH1

4,922 posts

182 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
Honestly if it was me I'd upgrade to an ISIS BB, you'd need new cranks too though.

Although if the cranks are still good and this is a winter beater then a replacement square taper will probably be perfectly good.

snotrag

15,624 posts

240 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
AndrewEH1 said:
Honestly if it was me I'd upgrade to an ISIS BB, you'd need new cranks too though.
You must be mental. Isis, octalink, and all those interim standards were utter crap - the larger axles requiring the use of smaller bearings.

I guarantee any bike shop mechanic would NOT recommend that.

Shminano UN52 in the right size, job done.


The only 'upgrade' would be to change to a modern external bearing type (e.g. Hollowtech II), but that is a bigger spend and wholly un-neccasary.

Even a £15 Shimano UN52 will be an upgrade over what the bike was supplied with as stock.

Make sure its fitted properly, the right size, and the crank bolts are torqued correctly.

TwistingMyMelon

6,506 posts

234 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
just budget to change every year tbh thats what i do

If I ever had one badly fail id change that view, but i have not so just treat as a consumable

My campy bike has a Hope expensive BB will see how that lasts in comparison

Ive had square tapers last years of hard abuse

Edited by TwistingMyMelon on Tuesday 8th November 11:34

battered

4,088 posts

176 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
snotrag said:
You must be mental. Isis, octalink, and all those interim standards were utter crap - the larger axles requiring the use of smaller bearings.
+1. I had a bike come with Isis, it was garbage. I replaced it with a square taper crankset that a mate gave me out of his bits box, it's still in use now. The Isis BB and cranks are now in MY bits box looking for a home.

Devil2575

Original Poster:

13,400 posts

217 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
timnoyce said:
From experience, there is nothing wrong with a square taper bottom bracket. I've also found them to actually last a lot longer than the more modern replacements. Realistically, you're going to be looking at £50-£60 for a new chainset and bottom bracket if you upgrade to a Shimano Deore. It will be an improvement, but probably not a very noticeable one.

I'd pay the £10 for a replacement and make sure it's well greased, then when that one wears out you'll probably be ready for a new chainset as you'll need to replace the chainrings by then too.
I was actually just thinking of a more expensive version of the same type of BB.

I'm not spending a lot upgrading this bike as it is only going to be used for winter commuting.


markoc

1,084 posts

225 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
+2 for not using ISIS. I hate it but have some cranks I love, and find myself going through BB's like there's no tomorrow.

The XT square taper that has been in my retro singlespeed for over 10 years is still spinning beautifully.

ISIS/Octalink are a prime example of a solution to a problem that didn't exist.