Back lights or front lights more important?
Discussion
I ask as my helmet mount has broken, so I can only have one light on top rather than two. Ive got front and rear on bike, so Ive got the choice of two at the front, or two at the back.
Busy semi rural route (Woking to Hampton), lots of A roads which can be dark due to overhanging trees
Busy semi rural route (Woking to Hampton), lots of A roads which can be dark due to overhanging trees
That was my train of thought as well, go for rear.
However, I then considered that most cycle incidents involve cars pulling out of side roads into cyclists, equally mini roundabouts. How many do get squished from the rear?
Sorry I'm not arguing, just putting my thought process into words!
However, I then considered that most cycle incidents involve cars pulling out of side roads into cyclists, equally mini roundabouts. How many do get squished from the rear?
Sorry I'm not arguing, just putting my thought process into words!
tenohfive said:
Rear one fails you don't know about it. Front one fails you do and can do something about it.
This seems imminently sensible, the one on the bike requires charging and its a 50min ride (x2) so it could run out if i'm not on the baLL.Hopefully Chain Reaction will replace it soon (had it a week, first time putting light in it after a recharge and the mount fails).
okgo said:
Most people only have one at each end on the bike. No drama.
I don't feel safe with only one each end -as others have said it's easy enough to lose one, or a bulb break, or a charge/battery to flake out on you. Plus some people see a flashing light better than a steady one, some people judge the distance to a flashing light better than a steady one. Gassing Station | Pedal Powered | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





t about cycling anyway.