VO2 Max test - full zone breakdown plus fat/carb burn rates
Discussion
I've posted this elsewhere, but it's probably more relevant for this group.
I did a VO2 Max test on Friday, I know it's the gold standard cardiovascular/cardiorespiratory assessment, but I've never been overly bothered. I've always relied on other metrics, plus 'feel', plus at 53yrs old I wasn't sure how useful it would be, but a friend arranged it and arranged a slight discount (£100) so I went along.
However, it was really insightful! Aside from the VO2 Max figure itself, we all got a report showing exact zone HR thresholds, where we all with from aerobic to anaerobic, fat vs carb fuelling etc. And then a consultation to talk us through it all.
Possibly the best £100 I've spent on my own fitness, definitely recommend if you have any element of geek about your cycling.
We used these guys: https://myvitalmetrics.com. Sites in London and Manchester. Can't recommend them highly enough.




I did a VO2 Max test on Friday, I know it's the gold standard cardiovascular/cardiorespiratory assessment, but I've never been overly bothered. I've always relied on other metrics, plus 'feel', plus at 53yrs old I wasn't sure how useful it would be, but a friend arranged it and arranged a slight discount (£100) so I went along.
However, it was really insightful! Aside from the VO2 Max figure itself, we all got a report showing exact zone HR thresholds, where we all with from aerobic to anaerobic, fat vs carb fuelling etc. And then a consultation to talk us through it all.
Possibly the best £100 I've spent on my own fitness, definitely recommend if you have any element of geek about your cycling.
We used these guys: https://myvitalmetrics.com. Sites in London and Manchester. Can't recommend them highly enough.
Interesting stuff, thanks for posting. How did they assess the fat vs carb burn rates in the last graph? Unusual to see that fat burn would go up, then down, then back up again over a range of power ouptuts; you'd expect it to have a linear build, up to the point of switch to pure carb energy system usage.
Did you find the numbers were about where you expected in terms of zones etc?
Did you find the numbers were about where you expected in terms of zones etc?
Voguely said:
Interesting stuff, thanks for posting. How did they assess the fat vs carb burn rates in the last graph? Unusual to see that fat burn would go up, then down, then back up again over a range of power ouptuts; you'd expect it to have a linear build, up to the point of switch to pure carb energy system usage.
Did you find the numbers were about where you expected in terms of zones etc?
It's all part of the test. Exactly how, I don't know. It is unusual to have such a flat fat burn (and flat and immediate carb burn). It's not, apparently, unusual for it to drop and pick up again. The others that died the tests all did that with the fat. Mine was a little unusual in having carb burn almost immediately, and such a flat fat burn that extended all the way to the anaerobic level.Did you find the numbers were about where you expected in terms of zones etc?
I do intermittent fasting though, and they suspected it was a benefit of that.
And yes, the HR zones were roughly where I thought, all very roughly 10% higher.
Yes it's a ramp test, but just go until you reach max VO2 (when the graph line starts to go down) and the RER figure gets to 1.1, it's not to a set 17 stages. Some get to more, some less. I think 22 is the max.
Start at 55w then goes up in 15w increments. Power isn't really part of it, you reach the inability to breathe enough before your legs give up so it levels the score between different bikes etc. My legs were fine, I wasn't reaching max power for my legs, but I just couldn't breathe, and everyone was the same, a bit like climbing above 2000m. That's what it is testing.
But yes, I am small. c60kg. I've not done an FTP test for a while. Last proper one was 305w in Summer 2024. Zwift calculations say its around 275w.
Start at 55w then goes up in 15w increments. Power isn't really part of it, you reach the inability to breathe enough before your legs give up so it levels the score between different bikes etc. My legs were fine, I wasn't reaching max power for my legs, but I just couldn't breathe, and everyone was the same, a bit like climbing above 2000m. That's what it is testing.
But yes, I am small. c60kg. I've not done an FTP test for a while. Last proper one was 305w in Summer 2024. Zwift calculations say its around 275w.
Gassing Station | Pedal Powered | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




