Auto with a clutch
Auto with a clutch
Author
Discussion

BB-Q

Original Poster:

1,697 posts

231 months

Friday 16th January 2009
quotequote all
How does that work then? Is this possible for road use too?

I noticed in that Ebay advert that they mention a BW35 with a clutch. Surely the torque multiplication from the torque converter is lost and makes the gearing horrible?

I must confess my knowledge of drag racing transmissions (and autos in general) leaves a lot to be desired, but some explanations would be great!

Like- how does a two speed work on a street/strip car? Does it need a massively broad power band or is there some serious slippage going on?

roscobbc

3,944 posts

263 months

Friday 16th January 2009
quotequote all
Try Honda I-Shift, VW/Audi/Skoda, Citroen etc - all are manual robotised gearboxes with one or two clutches. Torque multiplication is fine and perhaps desireable on a smaller engined car - with big engines and big horsepower it works against you - major traction issuesspin

BB-Q

Original Poster:

1,697 posts

231 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
roscobbc said:
Try Honda I-Shift, VW/Audi/Skoda, Citroen etc - all are manual robotised gearboxes with one or two clutches. Torque multiplication is fine and perhaps desireable on a smaller engined car - with big engines and big horsepower it works against you - major traction issuesspin
The production stuff is hardly relevant to racing though, is it? They struggle to contain the stock power levels and suffer from computer control too.

What about pressure for the valve chest? Surely the 'box needs the input shaft to be spinning to build oil pressure?

cliff gould

146 posts

231 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
hi bbq,
a friend of mine(john sultana)tried that about 15years ago.
his conbo was 351 ford with a c4/ram clutch.
remember he had lots of problems making it work ,mainly gearing.
think he ran 9.6s in the end ,but with lots of breakages on the way to that et.
cliff

PhilSweeney

111 posts

210 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
the clutch set up replaces the converter, a piece is made to go between clutch and engage with the pump. The pump is driven to give line pressure to the box, then you have a clutch to disengage drive yet line pressure to allow clutchless shifting with an auto.

snakehips

250 posts

214 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
Dose John still have that gorgeous black Manta?

redvictor

3,152 posts

258 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
Whatever trans you put a clutch against be prepared to rebuild it a lot.No auto trans can stand the abuse a clutch creates..

BB-Q

Original Poster:

1,697 posts

231 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
So they're stronger due to the lack of impact, for want of a better word, on the clutch packs? I don't imagine anything that hoists the front wheels being particularly gentle.

roscobbc

3,944 posts

263 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
BB-Q said:
roscobbc said:
Try Honda I-Shift, VW/Audi/Skoda, Citroen etc - all are manual robotised gearboxes with one or two clutches. Torque multiplication is fine and perhaps desireable on a smaller engined car - with big engines and big horsepower it works against you - major traction issuesspin
The production stuff is hardly relevant to racing though, is it? They struggle to contain the stock power levels and suffer from computer control too.

What about pressure for the valve chest? Surely the 'box needs the input shaft to be spinning to build oil pressure?
Only relavent in as much as more oem's are going this route - and what oem's do today - other may do tomorrow - it will be interesting to see if any aftermarket manufacturers will offer these transmissions in the future - anything that is computer controlled can be 'hacked' into and modified and improved. Hmm - Lenco robotised!

BB-Q

Original Poster:

1,697 posts

231 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
roscobbc said:
BB-Q said:
roscobbc said:
Try Honda I-Shift, VW/Audi/Skoda, Citroen etc - all are manual robotised gearboxes with one or two clutches. Torque multiplication is fine and perhaps desireable on a smaller engined car - with big engines and big horsepower it works against you - major traction issuesspin
The production stuff is hardly relevant to racing though, is it? They struggle to contain the stock power levels and suffer from computer control too.

What about pressure for the valve chest? Surely the 'box needs the input shaft to be spinning to build oil pressure?
Only relavent in as much as more oem's are going this route - and what oem's do today - other may do tomorrow - it will be interesting to see if any aftermarket manufacturers will offer these transmissions in the future - anything that is computer controlled can be 'hacked' into and modified and improved. Hmm - Lenco robotised!
The problem I see there is that these 'boxes aren't over enginerred like the old stuff- in fact they're the opposite and fail with alarming regularity (I know- I'm an RAC patrol). Modern stuff is designed to last around 4 years before failing and is engineered to cope with stock power outputs and nothing more. That doesn't really give the aftermarket much encouragement to go down that route, does it?

Veering off on a slight side track here, is there such a thing as an affordable, streetable sequential box? I'm trying to get some engineer friends to adapt a T5, but we're kind of frying our brains with the design!

Furyous

25,220 posts

242 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Define "affordable" please......

BB-Q

Original Poster:

1,697 posts

231 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Furyous said:
Define "affordable" please......
Erm, I suppose if I have to define "affordable" then I probably can't afford it!!!

veryoldfart

1,739 posts

226 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
redvictor said:
Whatever trans you put a clutch against be prepared to rebuild it a lot.No auto trans can stand the abuse a clutch creates..
neither can a Dual Mass Flywheel (ask mondeo/transit and sprinter owners) and your only talking 150bhp/300nm of torque there....

redvictor

3,152 posts

258 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
BB-Q said:
roscobbc said:
BB-Q said:
roscobbc said:
Try Honda I-Shift, VW/Audi/Skoda, Citroen etc - all are manual robotised gearboxes with one or two clutches. Torque multiplication is fine and perhaps desireable on a smaller engined car - with big engines and big horsepower it works against you - major traction issuesspin
The production stuff is hardly relevant to racing though, is it? They struggle to contain the stock power levels and suffer from computer control too.

What about pressure for the valve chest? Surely the 'box needs the input shaft to be spinning to build oil pressure?
Only relavent in as much as more oem's are going this route - and what oem's do today - other may do tomorrow - it will be interesting to see if any aftermarket manufacturers will offer these transmissions in the future - anything that is computer controlled can be 'hacked' into and modified and improved. Hmm - Lenco robotised!
The problem I see there is that these 'boxes aren't over enginerred like the old stuff- in fact they're the opposite and fail with alarming regularity (I know- I'm an RAC patrol). Modern stuff is designed to last around 4 years before failing and is engineered to cope with stock power outputs and nothing more. That doesn't really give the aftermarket much encouragement to go down that route, does it?

Veering off on a slight side track here, is there such a thing as an affordable, streetable sequential box? I'm trying to get some engineer friends to adapt a T5, but we're kind of frying our brains with the design!
What exactly are you trying to acheive Mark? you know your end goal....

BB-Q

Original Poster:

1,697 posts

231 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
The original question was one of interest because I didn't know how it worked and because I never discount an idea out of hand.
I need a reliable 'box with decent ratios for an affordable price to go behind a 400ft/lb(ish) 4 pot turbo motor for street and strip. I've currently got a T5, as that's really the only affordable option I know of and they come with excellent ratios as stock. Ihave a real dislike of auto because I don't feel in control of one, but then I've never driven a car with a "built" one. I know a Swede running a car same as mine (but in the 8's!!!) using a clutched Jerico, but again I know very little about those.
I've got to shoot back off to work now but am always interested in educating myself about the various options and what organs are required as payment.

Maybe a discussion of the pros and cons of various transmissions would be useful here?

steve y

460 posts

232 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Steve Johnson and I used to use these in the 80's you had to use a pre 1970 BW35 as it had two pumps, we used to remove the front pump, wweld up the front drum and weld a manual input shaft on, make up our own valve body and then we had a 3 speed trans with no reverse and no nuetral, had to use a rod to hold down the clutch pedal. please note when I mention the "we" above the genius was Steve I made the tea and got the chips!

Furyous

25,220 posts

242 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
BB-Q said:
Veering off on a slight side track here, is there such a thing as an affordable, streetable sequential box?
Affordable sequential box?

redvictor

3,152 posts

258 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Furyous said:
BB-Q said:
Veering off on a slight side track here, is there such a thing as an affordable, streetable sequential box?
Affordable sequential box?
lol,depends who's pocket is paying.For that money a full on Reid cased Glide and NCRC 10.5 pro mod converter can be had and you'll get change..biggrin

BB-Q

Original Poster:

1,697 posts

231 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Furyous said:
BB-Q said:
Veering off on a slight side track here, is there such a thing as an affordable, streetable sequential box?
Affordable sequential box?
I'll take that as a "no", then. biggrin