track car - 944 or MX5?
track car - 944 or MX5?
Author
Discussion

nitsypee

Original Poster:

154 posts

227 months

Monday 17th December 2007
quotequote all
For a first track car - which would you choose? 944 (prob S2) or MX5?

JakeR

3,944 posts

292 months

Monday 17th December 2007
quotequote all
from what I have read, 944 probably faster, MX5 probably more reliable and cheaper to run.

Probably.

Nurburgsingh

5,456 posts

261 months

Monday 17th December 2007
quotequote all
I've got an S2 and my bro has an MX5...

Both excellent cars but I would have to say the MX5 has more of a grin factor.. it might be down on power but it is up on handling, and its an open top...

Fly Boy

1,282 posts

264 months

Monday 17th December 2007
quotequote all
MX5 first choice- handles very well.
& when you NEED more power then very easy to tune (esp FI)

You won't regret it thumbup

Munter

31,330 posts

264 months

Monday 17th December 2007
quotequote all
Having got an MX5 I'd say.....get the 944. But then I have never had to maintain a 944...or even driven one. It's just a bit of a pain the MX5 being a bit down on power. But as someone else said lots of power upgrades for the mx5.

Gaaa I dont know.

NS24

1,113 posts

262 months

Monday 17th December 2007
quotequote all
944 S2 any time - check out this clip - what's the car at 5m30secs - can't do that in an MX5 thumbup

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YysVqtPKFug

james S

1,620 posts

268 months

Tuesday 18th December 2007
quotequote all
My track focused road legal 944 turbo is going up for sale once I get round to writing the advert

944t AMD tuned ~270 bhp
adjustable konis
968CS adjustable ARBs
removable steering wheel
Sparco seats with harnesses
much of the interior removed

pm me if interested and hopefully I'll have the advert up by then

Edited by james S on Tuesday 18th December 11:10

nitsypee

Original Poster:

154 posts

227 months

Tuesday 18th December 2007
quotequote all
Just a thought - how would an early MR2 compare as a track tool?

Munter

31,330 posts

264 months

Tuesday 18th December 2007
quotequote all
nitsypee said:
Just a thought - how would an early MR2 compare as a track tool?
My experiance did not go well. engine go boom rattle rattle. Harder to find a really good MK1 MR2 than a good MX5 due to the age. In another 10 years the MX5's will be the same.

Brando

55 posts

221 months

Tuesday 18th December 2007
quotequote all
This must be my 4th pro mx5 post in a week biggrin. Mx5!!!!!!!! 3 friends have 944 turbos and the three of them are very experienced drivers and good mechanics with far more exp than me, they all approved my choice of an mx5! I made the choice, besides questioning it once, and wouldn't swap my 5 for a 944 turbo (yet)!!! To have as much fun in the 944 you need to be a much better driver and drive to a far higher standard.

+ Cheap and very available parts
+ Millions of tuning options
+ Handling is sublime
+ Cheap Insurance
+ Top Down Motoring
+ No one expects anything from it
+ Awesome to live with day to day

- Lacks oooomf
- Most probably going to be the slowest car on any track day
- Hair dresser implications

None of the negatives bother me and I even use it as a daily drive to get to and fro work.


crackthatoff

3,314 posts

236 months

Tuesday 18th December 2007
quotequote all
you can get an elise for 7k these days !
depends how mutch you want to spend

mr2mk1chick

205 posts

244 months

Thursday 20th December 2007
quotequote all
nitsypee said:
Just a thought - how would an early MR2 compare as a track tool?
top fun (either N/A or supercharged)
can easily give a std mx5 a run for the money wink

when you get one without too much rust (but rusy = lighter LOL)

cheapest rwd track toy at the mo i think

Planet Claire

3,411 posts

232 months

Thursday 20th December 2007
quotequote all
MX5 vote here

But then I'm biased!

edh

3,498 posts

292 months

Friday 21st December 2007
quotequote all
Olly - we knew you wouldn't be safe in a 944 yet wink

Have to correct you though - you may know 3 people with 944 Turbos, but only 2 of them fall into the competent / experienced bracket. smile

I guess the S2 will be quicker (but still not hugely fast), will cost more to maintain & will also cost more to buy a good one. It's easy to buy a cheap S2 & have to spend a couple of grand sorting it out. 944's are quite heavy, & a bit soft on stock suspension.

Have a drive of both - as they are so different, I'm guessing one will appeal much more than the other when you drive them & the decision will be easy.

Furyblade_Lee

4,114 posts

247 months

Wednesday 26th December 2007
quotequote all
I am on my second bike-engined-car , but still i absolutely love getting in my mates bog standard Eunos around track. It is an absolute blast. Yes, it is slow(ish) in a straight line but it so safe to push over the limit a bit, it has never bitten me. And it has proved to be 100% bomb-proof in use in about 10 trackdays, just tyres and front pads. My only advice would be go for a mk1 1.8 Eunos (jap version MX5, handily cheaper anyway, £2,000 upwards) has it has an LSD as standard. You can hold some nice angles if permitted. Try to get one with the factory Bilstein suspension and strutbraces too if poss. And keep it on good street tyres at first (we use yokohama A539 and toyo T1-R as it keeps it all very progressive, especially in the wet). You will learn a hell of a lot driving one of those. It must take twice as long to hit 60 than mine, but still I wet myself sometimes, especially when the owner is sitting in the passenger seat.

As for the Porsche, superb car and I am a fan. But i have seen some Trackdays turn into very expensive days out for Porsche owners. My rule of thumb is do not track ANY car you cannot afford to crash, blow up or maintain properly (the third point, normally, ends up in the first or second point) NOTHING is cheap on a Porsche, especially if you hit something.

MR2, again nice car but the advantage of the engine in the back, traction ect is a bit lost if the engine is low(ish) power anyway, and does not (for me) outweigh the dissadvantages of roll-oversteer ect. when you want to have a play, over a blanced MX5.

And the Eunos will set you up nicely to handle the Caterham 7 you will want next!

jonamacg83

202 posts

238 months

Thursday 27th December 2007
quotequote all
Purely for cost reasons (repairs, parts, consumables etc) Id go for the MX-5 anyday, more reliable too. And its more fun spending the money you save on tune up bits etc. cool

kusee pee

1,021 posts

226 months

Friday 28th December 2007
quotequote all
nitsypee, I think what you need is an E36. Preferably in green with your name on the bonnetdriving. You know it makes sense...wink

durbster

11,796 posts

245 months

Monday 31st December 2007
quotequote all
As much as I love my MX-5 I don't think it's an ideal all-round trackday car in standard form simply because it's too slow on long straights and can be frustrating. Tight, twisty tracks however, are fine though so if you pick your locations well it wouldn't be a factor.

Obviously with so many MX-5s about, the experience would be different for everyone but I have to say mine got a bit scary down the Craner curves at 90mph because it rolled like I'd never felt before, so maybe it'd be a bit of a shocker round some of Silverstone's high speed corners.

Having said that, after a few goes I kept my foot down through the Craners (which says something about the power) and I did find myself trying to get it out of shape through Redgate just for kicks, so you certainly can't say that the car doesn't inspire confidence. That's probably true of the Porsche though at a guess smile

I've never had experience in a 944 so can't compare, but that's my MX-5 experience. smile

Jon944S2

942 posts

219 months

Monday 31st December 2007
quotequote all
A 944 turbo or supercharged S2/968 can be really fast with the right modifications I know some that are often faster than GT3RSs, elises, Evos, M3s and so on

AtomicRex

862 posts

250 months

Tuesday 1st January 2008
quotequote all
Im going to throw an Rx7 into the ring.....it will walk all over a 944, and you can get one for very little money...and they dont cost the earth to run either.