Staff using drugs
Author
Discussion

talkssense

Original Poster:

1,441 posts

231 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
Hopefully someone here can advise.

Our staff handbook states that attending work under the influence of alcohol or non prescribed drugs would be classed as gross misconduct. There is nothing regarding either out of work hours in the handbook.

One of staff is displaying all he signs of recreational canalised use, mainly total lck of short term memory, to the point that you can have a conversation with him, and ten minutes later when you mention what you discussed he just looks at you, with no idea of what you are talking about.

This is having a massive impact on his ability to do his job, and ultimately means I can't trust him to complete any task ever. We are only a small setup, and his inability to do what he is ment to do is costing me money.

He is on a written warning, having missed deadlines on all sorts of tasks, but can I legitimately raise my concerns about drug use withou opening myself up to all sorts of accusations and comeback?




Sirian

6 posts

166 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
Random drug test possible?

talkssense

Original Poster:

1,441 posts

231 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
Sirian said:
Random drug test possible?
Don't know, that's part of the question really. There's noting in our handbook so am I able to insist on a test? I guess not.

Changedmyname

12,549 posts

210 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
I had a stoner working for me in a meat plant, he came into work stoned, then on one break I caught him rolling a big one.
Fired him on the spot, I couldn't have someone working with knives stoned.

talkssense

Original Poster:

1,441 posts

231 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
I agree. However he isn't coming into work stoned, just really vacant and forgetful.

I'd sack him tomorrow for being rubbish, not capable of the position and not being able to manage his workload. Unfortunately as I understand it just being rubbish isn't sufficient reason to get rid, and I have to go through the correct procedures, namely reviews, written warnings blah blah blah

Ultuous

2,291 posts

220 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
talkssense said:
Unfortunately as I understand it just being rubbish isn't sufficient reason to get rid, and I have to go through the correct procedures, namely reviews, written warnings blah blah blah
Which is what you're going to have to do by the sounds of it - you've got no proof that his performance problems are down to drug abuse (it could even be down to prescription drugs for example, being taken for a condition you're unaware of), and it sounds like there's no company procedure in place for testing - anything else could be claimed to be harassment!

jontymo

848 posts

179 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
Need to talk to your senior and HR department, not easy to deal with these things as sometimes you get into all sorts of things when these situations arise.

talkssense

Original Poster:

1,441 posts

231 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
jontymo said:
Need to talk to your senior and HR department, not easy to deal with these things as sometimes you get into all sorts of things when these situations arise.
There are three of us. I am every department, and I have two guys who have very simple jobs which involve completing very basic task while I do everything else. This one guy does nothing accurately or on time, and is costing me money, I'd love to just tell him he is not up to it, but if I do I will be stuck with a tribunal and a fine for not following "correct procedure"

It doesn't matter what procedure we follow, or what the reasons are for his total lack of performance. As a small business his incompetence will take us down if he carries on like he is now

warp9

1,632 posts

226 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
If he's been with you for less than 1 year you can 'let him go' with no specifc reason. If not, performance management is another option, a bit of a faff and takes a couple of months, but gets it done. Seek advice before proceeding as you have to get the process right, ask them about random drug tests which also seems a good idea.

jontymo

848 posts

179 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
talkssense said:
jontymo said:
Need to talk to your senior and HR department, not easy to deal with these things as sometimes you get into all sorts of things when these situations arise.
There are three of us. I am every department, and I have two guys who have very simple jobs which involve completing very basic task while I do everything else. This one guy does nothing accurately or on time, and is costing me money, I'd love to just tell him he is not up to it, but if I do I will be stuck with a tribunal and a fine for not following "correct procedure"

It doesn't matter what procedure we follow, or what the reasons are for his total lack of performance. As a small business his incompetence will take us down if he carries on like he is now
I would have a look around for some HR assistance, there are a few businesses around which are set up to give smaller companys advice and help through all sorts of situations, maybe use linkedin, to try to find someone. I do know someone who used to work for us that set up to offer this sort of work but do not know costs or how much help they can be. pm me if you want there name.

Jon

Ki3r

8,835 posts

188 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
Out of interest, if he came in stinking of the stuff, would that be enough to sack him?

ALawson

8,054 posts

280 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
Most companies have a with cause or random clause in their handbooks.

I suggest that a brief chat to HR could get the handbook changes, you would then need to issue it to all staff giving them say 1 month to accept it (although THC can stay in the body for 3 months).

What industry are you in? In construction or any other industry where you can make safety critical decisions or effect other peoples safety then this sort of testing has been common in the industry for 10 years.

The other alternative is just to speak to the person, they may not know how bad there memory has got. A helpful chat may be all that is needed, on the other hand they probably don't think there is a problem!

Good luck.

anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 4th November 2012
quotequote all
warp9 said:
If he's been with you for less than 1 year you can 'let him go' with no specifc reason. If not, performance management is another option, a bit of a faff and takes a couple of months, but gets it done. Seek advice before proceeding as you have to get the process right, ask them about random drug tests which also seems a good idea.
If they started after 6th April 2012 this period is now 2 years.

Hilts

4,684 posts

311 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
talkssense said:
recreational canalised use
What kind of buzz do you get off that?

crazy about cars

4,454 posts

198 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
Just try to think outside the box here...

You haven't caught him actually smoking the stuff. He doesn't reek of cannabis. If this is a sudden change maybe something happened in his/her personal life? Being a boss is not just about punishing staff if something goes wrong. I suggest since you area smallish company try to have a nice informal chat to find out the underlying issue. Sometimes this works better than a warning letter.

Good luck.

Glassman

24,931 posts

244 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
crazy about cars said:
Just try to think outside the box here...

You haven't caught him actually smoking the stuff. He doesn't reek of cannabis. If this is a sudden change maybe something happened in his/her personal life? Being a boss is not just about punishing staff if something goes wrong. I suggest since you area smallish company try to have a nice informal chat to find out the underlying issue. Sometimes this works better than a warning letter.

Good luck.
This. First.

talkssense

Original Poster:

1,441 posts

231 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
Tried that, a number of times, both in the office and in the pub.

He is sorry, he knows he keeps cocking things up and forgetting stuff, and promises to try and make better notes and use the crm.

The next day it's like he can't even remember the conversation.


Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
Has he given any hint as to why his memory is poor?

Mattt

16,664 posts

247 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
Ki3r said:
Out of interest, if he came in stinking of the stuff, would that be enough to sack him?
It would be enough grounds for 'with cause' testing under most companies drugs & alcohol policies.

Mattt

16,664 posts

247 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
OP, are you sure it's drugs and not family/money/girl problems?